@article{aup:/content/journals/10.5117/2011.016.002.055, author = "Kuiper, Chris and Houweling, Loes", title = "Commentaar", journal= "KWALON", year = "2011", volume = "16", number = "2", pages = "", doi = "https://doi.org/10.5117/2011.016.002.055", url = "https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/2011.016.002.055", publisher = "Amsterdam University Press", issn = "1875-7324", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "qualitative causal research,generative causality,accessibility of the research object,utility of research,qualitative marketing research", abstract = "Reply Reply This contribution is a reply on the article ‘De waarde van kwalitatieve strategieën voor het praktijkgericht onderzoek’, written by Piet J.M. Verschuren. Using the concepts of framing, indolence, dialogue and polyphonic causality Kuiper and Houweling aim at enriching the discourse of causality perceptions in qualitative research presented by Verschuren. ", }