@article{aup:/content/journals/10.5117/2015.020.003.005, author = "Smaling, Adri and Evers, Jeanine and Nijhof, Gerhard and de Boer, Fijgje and Krebbekx, Willemijn and Wester, Fred", title = "Vragen omtrent het interview", journal= "KWALON", year = "2015", volume = "20", number = "3", pages = "", doi = "https://doi.org/10.5117/2015.020.003.005", url = "https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/2015.020.003.005", publisher = "Amsterdam University Press", issn = "1875-7324", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "validity of the interview,biased viewpoint,reactivity,subjectivity and meaning,meaning and conduct", abstract = "Discussion on the interview as research method Discussion on the interview as research method In discussing the interview as a research method Evers prefers Focus Group discussions of medicine users to assess behavioural patterns, Krebbekx mentions reactions of the interviewees on the personal background of the interviewer, and De Boer discusses the social and subjective nature of the information obtained. In contrast, Smaling sees the interview as a necessary source to complete observational data and Nijhof promotes the interview for specific unknown realities like the experiences of the chronic ill.", }