@article{aup:/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2019.4.006.LAUW, author = "Lauwaert, Lode", title = "Artificiële intelligentie en normatieve ethiek", journal= "Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte", year = "2019", volume = "111", number = "4", pages = "585-603", doi = "https://doi.org/10.5117/ANTW2019.4.006.LAUW", url = "https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2019.4.006.LAUW", publisher = "Amsterdam University Press", issn = "2352-1244", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "Robert Sparrow", keywords = "oorlog", keywords = "ethiek", keywords = "AI", keywords = "Just War Theory", keywords = "technologie", keywords = "LAWS", abstract = "Abstract Artificial intelligence and normative ethics: Who is responsible for the crime of LAWS? In his text “Killer Robots”, Robert Sparrow holds that killer robots should be forbidden. This conclusion is based on two premises. The first is that attributive responsibility is a necessary condition for admitting an action; the second premise is that the use of killer robots is accompanied by a responsibility gap. Although there are good reasons to conclude that killer robots should be banned, the article shows that Sparrow's argument for the ban is not correct.", }