Abstract
Abstract
How Galileo Galilei discovered the law of fall, and the difference that this makes
Galileo’s law of fall is one of the crucial building blocks of classical mechanics. The question how this law was discovered has often been a topic of debate. This article offers a reconstruction of the developments within Galileo’s research that led to the discovery of the law. This reconstruction is offered to make a philosophical point regarding the epistemic status of experimental results: Galileo’s experiments can offer sufficient justification for the acceptance of the law of fall only because of their place in a broad research programme.
© 2021 Amsterdam University Press
Article metrics loading...
/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.1.004.VAND
2021-02-01
2024-03-28
Full text loading...
/deliver/fulltext/00025275/113/1/05_ANTW2021.1_VAND.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.1.004.VAND&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
References
-
Büttner, J.(2019). Swinging and Rolling. Unveiling Galileo’s unorthodox path from a challenging problem to a new science. Dordrecht: Springer.
[Google Scholar]
-
Damerow, P., Freudenthal, G., McLaughlin, P. & Renn, J.(2004). Exploring the Limits of Preclassical Mechanics. New York, NY: Springer New York.
[Google Scholar]
-
Drake, S.(1973). Galileo’s Experimental Confirmation of Horizontal Inertia: Unpublished Manuscripts. Isis, 64, 290-305.
[Google Scholar]
-
Fredette, R.(2001). Galileo’s De motu antiquiora: Notes for a Reappraisal. In J.Montesinos & C.Solis Santos (red.), Largo Campo di Filosofare (pp. 165-181). La Orotava: Fundacion Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia.
[Google Scholar]
-
Galilei, G.(1890). Le Opere di Galileo Galilei (A. Favaro, red.). Firenze: Barbera.
[Google Scholar]
-
Hahn, A. J.(2002). The Pendulum Swings Again: A Mathematical Reassessment of Galileo’s Experiments with Inclined Planes. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 56(4), 339-361.
[Google Scholar]
-
Harper, W.(2002). Newton’s Argument for Universal Gravitation. In I. B.Cohen & G. E.Smith (red.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton (pp. 174-201). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Koyré, A.(1953). An Experiment in Measurement. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 97(2), 222-237.
[Google Scholar]
-
Mahoney, M. S.(2000). Huygens and the Pendulum: From Device to Mathematical Relation. In E.Grosholz & H.Breger (red.), The Growth of Mathematical Knowledge (pp. 17-39). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
[Google Scholar]
-
Palmerino, C. R.(2010). Experiments, Mathematics, Physical Causes: How Mersenne Came to Doubt the Validity of Galileo’s Law of Free Fall. Perspectives on science, 18(1), 50-76.
[Google Scholar]
-
Renn, J., Damerow, P., Rieger, S. & Giulini, D.(2000). Hunting the White Elephant: When and How did Galileo Discover the Law of Fall?Science in Context, 13(3-4), 299-419.
[Google Scholar]
-
Settle, T. B.(1961). An Experiment in the History of Science. Science, 133(3445), 19-23.
[Google Scholar]
-
Smith, G. E.(2002). The Methodology of the Principia. In I. B.Cohen & G. E.Smith (red.), The Cambridge Companion to Newton (pp. 138-173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[Google Scholar]
-
Van Dyck, M.(2018). Idealization and Galileo’s Proto-Inertial Principle. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 919-929.
[Google Scholar]
-
Yoder, J. G.(1988). Unrolling Time: Christiaan Huygens and the Mathematization of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2021.1.004.VAND