Volume 114, Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract

This article discusses the relevance of historian of technology Lewis Mumford (1895-1990) for a philosophy of habit. Although Mumford is not traditionally interpreted as a philosopher of habit, the aim of the article is to show that Mumford’s approach to biotechnics contains (i) an anthropology in which habit, rather than technology, is of decisive importance in human history; (ii) an original interpretation of habit which differs from both the classical Aristotelian approach, as well as from a modernist approach like that of Hegel; (iii) a non-materialist interpretation of work, which problematizes the recent emergence of flexible work as a problem of habit, allowing for an original evaluation of the problem of precarization. What is at stake here is a re-evaluation of the relation between habit and psychopathology, in light of which Mumford shows that modern work tends to destabilize millennia-old habits, prompting the question of how these habits might be sustained.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.3.005.PUTT
2022-10-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Boltanski, L. en E.Chiapello (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Parijs: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, S. (2006[1872]) Erewhon. New York: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, S. (2010[1878]) Life and Habit. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Deleuze, G. (1968) Différence et Répétition. Parijs: Épimethée.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deleuze, G. en F.Guattari (1972) L’Anti-Oedipe. Parijs: Minuit.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Heidegger, M. (2000[1957]) Die Frage nach der Technik. In Gesamtausgabe Bd. 7, 5-36. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hegel, G.W.F. (1979) Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lockwood, T.C. (2013) Habituation, Habit, and Character in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, in A History of Habit: From Aristotle to Bourdieu, red. TomSparrow en AdamHutchinson. New York: Lexington Books, pp. 19-29.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Malabou, C. (1996) The Future of Hegel, vert. LisabethDuring. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Marx, K. (2016[1894]) Das Kapital. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie Dritter Band. Buch III: Der Gesammtprocess Der Kapitalistischen Produktion. Hamburg: Nikol.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mumford, L. (2014) Tool Users vs. Homo Sapiens and the Megamachine, in Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition, red. Robert C.Scharff en ValDusek. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 381-388.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mumford, L. (1934) Technics and Civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ravaisson, F. (2008) Of Habit, vert. ClaireCarlisle en MarkSinclair. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Seneca. (2015) Letters on Ethics: To Lucilius. vert. MargaretGraver en A.A.Long. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Sennett, R. (1999) On the personal consequences of work in the new economy, in: The Jobs Letter, no.102 / 30June.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Standing, G. (2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stiegler, B. (1994) La technique et le temps 1: La faute d’Epiméthée. Parijs: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tolstoj, L. (1947) Anna Karenina, vert. LourensReedijk. Wageningen: Veen.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Žižek, S.“Discipline between Two Freedoms – Madness and Habit in German Idealism.” In Mythology, Madness and Laughter: Subjectivity in German Idealism, red SlavojŽižek en MarkusGabriel, 95-118. New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ANTW2022.3.005.PUTT
Loading
Keyword(s): flexibility; habit; Lewis Mumford; philosophy of work; precarization

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed