2004
Volume 23, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1384-5845
  • E-ISSN: 2352-1171

Abstract

Abstract

This article aims at showing that the special interpretations of asymmetrical coordinate structures result from an interplay between the syntactico-semantic output of the grammar and pragmatics, but that they do not necessitate the introduction of special syntactico-semantic means; standard assumptions about syntax, semantics and pragmatics suffice for providing an adequate description of the core data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.3.004.BROE
2019-01-01
2022-11-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/13845845/23/3/04_NEDTAA2018.3.BROE.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.3.004.BROE&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bos, Gijsbertha F.(1964). Het probleem van de samengestelde zin, University of Utrecht: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff(1997). Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 195–217.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Groot, Albert W.(1949). Structurele Syntaxis (2nd impression, 1965). Den Haag: Servire.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dik, Simon C.(1968). Coordination: its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elffers-van Ketel, Els(1991). The historiography of grammatical concepts: 19th and 20th-century changes in the subject-predicate conception and the problem of their historical reconstruction. University of Amsterdam: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fortuin, Egbert & Ronny Boogaart(2009). Imperative as conditional; from constructional to compositional semantics. Cognitive Linguistics20, 641–673.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Grice, Herbert Paul(1975). Logic and conversation. In: Peter Cole & Jerry L.Morgan (eds.) Speech acts: Syntax and Semantics 3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, GuidoGeerts, Jaapde Rooij & Maarten C. van den Toorn(1997). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst, 2nd, revised edition. Groningen: Nijhoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.) (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kraak, Albert & Wim Klooster(1972). Syntaxis, 2nd edition. Culemborg: Stam/Robijns.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Malepaard, Joop(2007). Inverse disjuncties. Voortgang. Jaarboek voor de Neerlandistiek XXV, 311–360.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Malepaard, Joop(2008). Anticipatie en versnelde successie als referentie van inverse disjuncties met nog niet en nog niet eens. Voortgang. Jaarboek voor de NeerlandistiekXXVI, 253–297.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Neijt, Anneke(1979). Gapping. A contribution to sentence grammar. University of Utrecht: PhD Thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Proeme, Henk(1984). Over de Nederlandse imperativus. Forum der Letteren25, 241–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schmerling, Susan F.(1975). Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In: PeterCole & Jerry L.Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 211–231.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Terwey, Tijs(1892). Over de zoogenaamde bijzinnen met of, die met een ontkennenden hoofdzin in verband staan. Taal en Letteren2, 76–91.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Canegem-Ardijns, Ingrid & William Van Belle(2010). Wanneer of geen en is. Asymmetrische exclusieve disjuncties in het Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde15, 54–78.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Van den Toorn, Maarten C.(1972). Balansschikking en disjunctie. De Nieuwe Taalgids65, 104–123.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Van der Heijden, Emmeke(1999). Tussen nevenschikking en onderschikking. Een onderzoek naar verschillende vormen van verbinding in het Nederlands. University of Nijmegen: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Hauwermeiren, Paul(1973). Enkele opmerkingen bijM.C.van den Toorn: Balansschikking en disjunctie. De Nieuwe Taalgids66, 148–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wagner, Michael(2010). Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28, 183–237.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Welschen, Ad(1999). Duale syntaxis en polaire contractie. Negatief gebonden of-constructies in het Nederlands. Free University Amsterdam: PhD thesis.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zhang, Niina Ning(2010). Coordination in Syntax. Cambridge (UK)/New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.3.004.BROE
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/NEDTAA2018.3.004.BROE
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error