RT Journal Article SR Electronic(1) A1 Peels, Rik A1 van Woudenberg, RenéYR 2008 T1 Een falend atheïstisch argument. Een reactie op Herman Philipse JF NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion, VO 62 IS 3 SP 196 OP 202 DO https://doi.org/10.5117/NTT2008.62.196.PEEL PB Amsterdam University Press, SN 2590-3268, AB In his article ‘Religious Belief in the Age of Science: An Epistemological Tragedy’ Herman Philipse gives a reply to our critique of his argument in favor of what he calls disjunctive atheism. In this paper we argue that his response seriously fails: disjunctive atheism, as it stands, is still utterly unconvincing. We respond to Philipse’s objection that it is a procedural anomaly to subject the theses and arguments that we find in his book to academic philosophical criteria and we provide some more argumentative evidence for the claim that there is no good reason to accept either (P2) or (P3), two crucial premises in Philipse’s argument., UL https://www.aup-online.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2008.62.196.PEEL