2004
Volume 76, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, I offer some personal reflections on the developments has gone through in recent years. Moreover, I argue that the continuing existence of journals like is important for three reasons. (1) This type of general journals counterbalances the overspecialization that characterizes today’s universities. (2) Their rootedness in particular geographical areas and political entities makes that this type of journal makes a distinctive contribution to theology and religious studies. (3) It is important that this journal keeps theology and religious studies together in one journal, for in spite of centrifugal forces at work, they belong together.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2022.1.001.SARO
2022-01-01
2022-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arfman, William, SakinaLoukili, BirgitMeyer, JelleWiering, LiekeWijnia & EricVenbrux.“The Current Crisis in Dutch Study of Religion and the Role of the NGG,”NTT JTSR74, no. 4 (2020): 315-318.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Becking, Bob.“Sprekend (over) God: Een Inleiding op de vraag wat theologie is.” In Wat is Theologie? Oriëntatie op een discipline, edited by Willem J.van Asselt et al., 11-22. Zoetermeer: Meinema, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bom, Klaas. “Casus Kinshasa: Over de relatie tussen de antropologie van het christendom en systematische theologie,” NTT70, no. 1 (2016): 128-139.
  4. Bom, Klaas., Petruschka Schaafsma, Benno van den Toren & Heleen Zorgdrager. “De eigenheid van theologie: Een reactie op Klaar om te wenden,”NTT70, no. 1 (2016): 87-98.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Corigliano, Stephanie.“Religious Studies, Theology & the Scholar-Practitioner,” Embodied Philosophy. Accessed 13March, 2021. https://www.embodiedphilosophy.com/religious-studies-theology-the-scholar-practitioner/.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Davidsen, Markus Altena. “Theo van Baaren’s Systematic Science of Religion Revisited: The Current Crisis in Dutch Study of Religion and a Way Out,”NTT JTSR74, no. 3 (2020): 213-241.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. De Kraker-Zijlstra, Anieljah, HannekeMuthert, HettyZock & MartinWalton. “Aandacht voor zingeving: Context en praktijk van geestelijke verzorging in het aardbevingsgebied van Groningen,”NTT JTSR75, no. 1 (2021): 31-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Den Hollander, August, HettyZock & Henkde Roest. “Lezersenquête Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift,”NTT60, no. 4 (2006): 273-274.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Griffiths, Paul J.“The Very Idea of Religion,”First Things103 (May2000): 30-35.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hellemans, Staf. De grote transformatie van religie en van de Katholieke Kerk. Tilburg: Tilburg University, 2019.
  11. Helmer, Christine. “Theology and the Study of Religion: A Relationship.” In Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies, edited by Robert A.Orsi, 230-254. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Huijgen, Arnold. Maria: Icoon van genade. Utrecht: Kokboekencentrum, 2021.
  13. Jedan, Christoph. “Proportionate Universalism and Public Health: An Analysis of WRR Policy Brief From Disparity to Potential,”NTT JTSR75, no. 1 (2021): 73-93.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Klaver, Miranda. Hillsong Church: Expansive Pentecostalism, Media, and the Global City. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
  15. Kripal, Jeffrey J.Comparing Religions: Coming to Terms. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.
  16. Meyer, Birgit.Sensational Movies: Video, Vision and Christianity in Ghana. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2015.
  17. Molendijk, Arie L.“Vruchten van wetenschappelijke studie: 60 jaar Nederlands Theologisch Tijdschrift,”NTT60, no. 1 (2006): 1-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Orsi, Robert A., ed. The Cambridge Companion to Religious Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
  19. Pleizier, Theo, ArnoldHuijgen & Dolfte Velde. “On the Construction of Religious Texts: The Case of Writing a Catechism,”NTT JTSR74, no. 4 (2020): 355-373.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rafols, Ismael, et al. “How Journal Rankings Can Suppress Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management,”Research Policy41, no. 7 (2012): 1262-1282, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.017.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rakow, Katja. “Of Bogeymen and The Promises of The Past or How to Construct a Uniform Identity: A Response to Markus Davidsen,”NTT JTSR74, no. 3 (2020): 253-262.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rasker, A.J.“Wat de Remonstranten bij hun komst in Leiden vonden,”Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis55, no.1 (1974): 84-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Russell, Bertrand. The Analysis of Mind. London: Routledge, 2005.
  24. Sarot, Marcel. “Theologie en godsdienstwetenschappen gescheiden? Pleidooi om beide samen te houden,”Tijdschrift voor Theologie45, no. 4 (2005): 338-347.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Schaafsma, Petruschka.“Verwantschap – tussen theologie en antropologie,”NTT70, no. 1 (2016): 99-112.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van den Beukel, Arie. “Het heil van de natuurwetenschap.” In Het heil van de natuurwetenschap, edited by WilDerkse, 13-27. Baarn: Gooi & Sticht, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Van den Brink, Gijsbert.Philosophy of Science for Theologians: An Introduction. Frankfurt aM: Peter Lang, 2009.
  28. Van den Toren, Benno.“Secularisatie in Afrika: Een casestudie over het belang van de systematische theologie voor de religiewetenschappen,”NTT70, no. 1 (2016): 140-150.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Von der Dunk, H.W.“Geschiedenis en wetenschap.” In Overtuigend bewijs: Over het wetenschappelijke van de niet-exacte wetenschappen, edited by P.B.Cliteur, H.D.Papma & R.T.P.Wiche, 38-64. Amsterdam: Boom, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Von Stuckrad, Kocku. “Institutional Histories, Identity Work, and Critical Theory: A Response to Markus Davidsen,”NTT JTSR74, no. 3 (2020): 243-252.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams, Duncan Ryûken. “At Ease in between: The Middle Position of a Scholar-Practitioner,”Journal of Global Buddhism9 (2008): 155-163.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Zorgdrager, Heleen. “Het punkgebed van Pussy Riot: een dans van sociale wetenschappen en theologie,”NTT70, no. 1 (2016): 113-127.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2022.1.001.SARO
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error