Volume 42 Number 3

Abstract

Samenvatting

In deze bijdrage geeft de auteur nieuwe richting aan het gehechtheidsonderzoek door het stellen van ‘ongemakkelijke’ vragen over fundamentele, maar vaak bekritiseerde claims van de gehechtheidstheorie. Het doel is deuren te openen voor discussie, innovatief empirisch en theoretisch werk te inspireren en aandacht te vragen voor culturele processen in de vorming van gehechtheidsrelaties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/PED2022.3.003.MESM
2022-12-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/15677109/42/3/PED2022.3.003.MESM.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/PED2022.3.003.MESM&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baldwin, J. (1984). Notes of a native son. Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1955)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969)
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds). (2016). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852-877). New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hergovich, A., Schott, R., & Burger, C. (2010). Biased evaluation of abstracts depending on topic and conclusion: Further evidence of a confirmation bias within scientific psychology. Current Psychology, 29(3), 188-209.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 27(2), 95-111.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller, H. (2018). Universality claim of attachment theory: Children’s socioemotional development across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 115, 11414-11419.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Keller, H., Bard, K., Morelli, G., Chaudhary, N., Vicedo, M., Rosabal-Coto, M., … Gottlieb, A. (2018). The myth of universal sensitive responsiveness: Comment on Mesman et al. (2017). Child Development, 89(5), 1921-1928.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kermoian, R., & Leiderman, P. H. (1986). Infant attachment to mother and child caretaker in an East African community. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9(4), 455-469.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lessing, D. (1976). The golden notebook. St Albans, UK: Panther Books. (Original work published 1962)
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Meehan, C. L., & Hawks, S. (2013). Cooperative breeding and attachment among the Aka foragers. In N.Quinn & J. M.Mageo (Eds.), Attachment reconsidered: Cultural perspectives on a Western theory (pp. 85-114). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mesman, J. (2018). Sense and sensitivity: A response to the commentary by Keller et al. (2018). Child Development, 89(5), 1929-1931.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mesman, J., Minter, T., Angnged, A., Cissé, I. A. H., Salali, G. D., & Migliano, A. B. (2017). Universality without uniformity: A culturally inclusive approach to sensitive responsiveness in infant caregiving. Child Development, 89(3), 837-850.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mesman, J., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2016). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J.Cassidy & P. R.Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 852-877). New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Otto, H., & Keller, H. (Eds.). (2014). Different faces of attachment: Cultural variations on a universal human need. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge. (Original work published 1959)
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Simpson, J. A., & Belsky, J. (2016). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In J.Cassidy & P. R.Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 91-116). New York: Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. True, M. M., Pisani, L., & Oumar, F. (2001). Infant–mother attachment among the Dogon of Mali. Child Development, 72, 1451-1466.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/PED2022.3.003.MESM
Loading
Keyword(s): Attachment theory; critical appraisal; cultural diversity; reflective science; universality claims

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed