Volume 71 Number 2
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TET2019.2.RUTT
2020-03-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00398691/71/2/01_TET2019_2_RUTT.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TET2019.2.RUTT&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Braunmüller, Kurt &GisellaFerraresi (red.).2003.Aspects of Multilingualism in European Language History.Amsterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Havinga, Anna &NilsLanger (red.).2015Invisible Languages in the Nineteenth Century.Bern:Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hüning, Matthias, UlrikeVogl &OliverMoliner (red.).2012.Standard Languages and Multilingualism in European History.Amsterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Irvine, Judith T. &SusanGal(2000).Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. InKroskrityPaul V. (red.), Regimes of language. Ideologies, polities, and identities(pp. 35-83). Santa Fe:School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Pahta, Päivi, JanneSkaffari &LauraWright (red).2018.Multilingual Practices in Language History. English and Beyond.Berlin:De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Peersman, Catharina, GijsbertRutten &RikVosters (red.).2015.Past, Present and Future of a Language Border. Germanic-Romance Encounters in the Low Countries.Berlin:De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Poplack, Shana.2018.Borrowing: Loanwords in the speech community and in the grammar.New York:Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Rutten, Gijsbert, JosephSalmons, WimVandenbussche &RikVosters (red.).2017.Historical Multilingualism: Language Contact, Use and Planning.Berlin:De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rutten, Gijsbert, RikVosters &Marijkevan der Wal.2015.Frenchification in discourse and practice. Loan morphology in private letters of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. InPeersmanCatharina, RuttenGijsbert &VostersRik (red.), Past, present and future of a language border. Germanic-Romance encounters in the Low Countries(pp. 143-169). Berlin & Boston:De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Schrijver, Peter.2014.Language Contact and the Origins of the Germanic Languages.New York:Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Van der Sijs, Nicoline.2009.Loanwords in Dutch. InHaspelmathMartin &TadmorUri (red.), Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook(pp. 338-359). Berlin & New York:Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Stenroos, Merja, MarttiMäkinen &IngeSærheim (red).2012.Language Contact and Development Around the North Sea.Amsterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Vanhecke, Eline &JetjeDe Groof(2007).New data on language policy and language choice in 19th-century Flemish city administrations. InElspaßStephan, LangerNils, ScharlothJoachim &VandenbusscheWim (red.), Germanic language histories from below (1700-2000)(pp. 449-465). Berlin & New York:De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Willemyns, Roland, ElineVanhecke &WimVandenbussche.2005.Politische Loyalität und Sprachwahl. Eine Fallstudie aus Flandern im frühen neunzehnten Jahrhundert. InBernerElisabeth, BöhmManuela & VoesteAnja (red.), Ein gross vnnd narhafft haffen. Festschrift für Joachim Gessinger(pp. 197-207). Potsdam:Universitätsverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TET2019.2.RUTT
Loading

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed