oa Dissenting Daughters

References

1. Ahmed, S. (2014). Mixed orientations. Subjectivity, 7(1), 92–109.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Avishai, O. (2008). “Doing religion” in a secular world: women in conservative religions and the question of agency. Gender and Society, 22(4), 409–433.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bracke, S. (2008). Conjugating the modern/religious, conceptualizing female religious agency: contours of a “post-secular” conjuncture. Theory, Culture & Society25(6), 51–67.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brittenden, P.J.S. (2023). Liberating liminality in the contemporary church of Algeria’, in Z.Hadromi-Allouche & M.H.Mckay (Eds.), Betwixt and Between Liminality and Marginality (pp. 37–54), London: Lexington Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Davidman, L. (2015). Becoming Un-Orthodox: Stories of Ex-Hasidic Jews. Oxford: OUP.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davis, T., & Paramanathan, G. (2023). Liminal (trans)formative spaces: a temporary escape from intersectionality. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, DOI: 10.1111/joca.12532
   [Google Scholar]
7. Demeijer, F. (2020). Over Apostolisch Zijn Gesproken… Zes Generaties Lidmaten over de Rol van het Apostolisch Genootschap in hun Leven. Utrecht: Eburon.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Doorenspleet, R. (2020). Apostelkind: In de Greep van een Gesloten Gemeenschap. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Balans.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Gaddini, K. (2023). The Struggle to Stay: Why Single Evangelical Women Are Leaving the Church. New York: Colombia University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gallonier, J. (2018). ‘Moving in or moving toward? reconceptualizing conversion to Islam as a liminal process’, in K.van Nieuwkerk (Ed.), Moving In and Out of Islam (pp. 44–66). Austin: Texas University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gardner, C.J. (2017). “Created this way”: liminality, rhetorical agency, and the transformative power of constraint among gay Christian college students. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(1), 31–47.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Izharuddin, A. (2019). ‘After the hijab: liminal states of post-veiling embodiment’, in V.Thimm (Ed.), (Re-)Claiming Bodies Through Fashion and Style: Gendered Configurations in Muslim Contexts (pp. 173 – 189). Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kirk, K., Bal, E., & Janssen, S.R. (2017). Migrants in liminal time and space: an exploration of the experiences of highly skilled Indian bachelors in Amsterdam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(16), 2771–2787.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mahmood, S. (2005). The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Prior, J., & Cusack, C.M. (2008). Ritual, liminality and transformation: secular spirituality in Sydney’s gay bathhouses. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 271–281.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rantala, T. (2023). Following the views of young former Conservative Laestadian women on reproductive freedom, procreational ethos, and pronatalist politics. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 31(3), 222–235.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Robertson, N.2018. The power and subjection of liminality and borderlands of non-binary folx. Gender Forum, 69, 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Sharman, R.L. (2001). The Caribbean carretera: race, space and social liminality in Costa Rica. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 20(1), 46–62.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Turner, K. (2019). Convertitis and the struggle with liminality for female converts to Islam in Australia. Archives de Sciences Sociales des Religions, 186, 71–91.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Turner, V. (1967). Betwixt-and-between: the liminal period in rites de passage. In The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual (pp. 60–92). London: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Turner, V. (1969). The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Van den Brandt, N., & Rantala, T. (2024). Gendered and embodied un/learning among women disengaging from faith in the UK and Finland. Approaching Religion, 14(2), 224–239.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Van Lieburg, F. (2023). Voorbij de nationale kerkenstamboom: naar een inclusieve genealogie van het christendom in Nederland. Religie & Samenleving, 18(3), 177–198.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Vliek, M. (2023). Let’s talk about gender: women’s narratives of moving out of Islam in contemporary Europe. Religion and Gender, 13(2), 227–253.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Watling, T. (2006). Religious orthodoxy as popular belief: calling, diversity and dynamism in Reformed Protestant religion in the Netherlands. Modern Believing, 47(2), 24–43.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Willet, J., & Deegan, M.J. (2001). Liminality and disability: rites of passage and community in hypermodern society. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(3), 137–152.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Willey, R.D. (2016). Liminal practice: Pierre Bourdieu, madness, and religion. Social Compass, 63(1), 125–141.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Zion-Waldoks, T. (2015). Politics of devoted resistance: agency, feminism, and religion among orthodox agunah activists in Israel. Gender & Society, 29(1), 73–97.
    [Google Scholar]