oa ‘Neurorecht’ in Nederland

References

1. Adleman, N. E., Menon, V., Blasey, C. M., White, C. D., Warsofsky, I. S., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L.(2002)A developmental fMRI study of the stroop color-word task, Neuroimage16(1), pp. 61-75. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1046
   [Google Scholar]
2. Batts, S.(2009)Brain lesions and their implications in criminal responsibility, Behavioral Sciences and the Law27(2), pp. 261-272. doi: 10.1002/bsl.857
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berker, S.(2009)The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience, Philosophy & Public Affairs37(4), pp. 293-329.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bieri, P.(2001)Das Handwerk der Freiheit. Über die Entdeckung des eigenen Willens. München:Carl Hanser.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Buckholtz, J. W., & Faigman, D. L.(2014)Promises, promises for neuroscience and law. Current Biology24(18), R861-R867. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.057
   [Google Scholar]
6. Canli, T., & Amin, Z.(2002)Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: scientific evidence and ethical considerations, Brain and Cognition50(3), pp. 414-431.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Casey, B. J., Tottenham, N., Liston, C., & Durston, S.(2005)Imaging the developing brain: what have we learned about cognitive development?Trends in Cognitive Sciences9(3), pp. 104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.01.011
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caulfield, T., & Condit, C.(2012)Science and the sources of hype. Public Health Genomics15(3-4), pp. 209-217. doi: 10.1159/000336533
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cohen, A. O., & Casey, B. J.(2014)Rewiring juvenile justice: the intersection of developmental neuroscience and legal policy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences18(2), pp. 63-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.002
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cranford, R. E.(1989)The neurologist as ethics consultant and as a member of the institutional ethics committee: The neuroethicist, Neurologic Clinics, 7(4), pp. 697-713.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crick, F., & Koch, C.(1998)Consciousness and neuroscience. Cerebral Cortex8(2), pp. 97-107.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Crone, E.(2008)Het puberende brein. Over de ontwikkeling van de hersenen in de unieke periode van de adolescentie. Amsterdam:Bert Bakker.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dehue, T.(2014)Betere Mensen. Over gezondheid als keuze en koopwaar. Amsterdam:Augustus.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dennett, D. C.(2003)Freedom evolves. London:Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Draaisma, D.(2005)Het verdriet van de kosmopoliet, NRC Handelsblad.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dresser, R.(2008) Neuroscience’s Uncertain Threat to Criminal Law, Hastings Center Report, November/December2008, pp. 9-10.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dreyfuss, M., Caudle, K., Drysdale, A. T., Johnston, N. E., Cohen, A. O., Somerville, L. H., . . . Casey, B. J.(2014)Teens Impulsively React rather than Retreat from Threat, Developmental Neuroscience36(3-4), pp. 220-227. doi: 10.1159/000357755
    [Google Scholar]
18. du Bois-Reymond, E. (1872/1974) Über die Grenzen des Naturerkennens, in E.du Bois-Reymond (red.) Vorträge über Philosophie und Gesellschaft. Hamburg:Meiner.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Farah, M. J.(2012)Neuroethics: the ethical, legal, and societal impact of neuroscience. Annual Review of Psychology63, pp. 571-591. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100438
    [Google Scholar]
20. Farahany, N. A.(2015)Neuroscience and behavioral genetics in US criminal law: an empirical analysis, Journal of Law and the Bioscience2(3), pp. 485-509. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv059
    [Google Scholar]
21. Feigenson, N.(2006)Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI, International Journal of Law in Context2(3), pp. 233-255.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Francken, J. C., & Slors, M.(2018)Neuroscience and everyday life: Facing the translation problem. Brain and Cognition120, pp. 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.004
    [Google Scholar]
23. Freeman, M.(2006)Introduction: law and neuroscience. International Journal of Law in Context2(3), pp. 217-219.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gazzaniga, M. S.(2005)The Ethical Brain. New York, Washington, D.C.:DANA Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gazzanigga, M. S.(1998)The Mind’s Past. Berkely:University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gazzanigga, M. S., & Gallagher, S.(1998)The Neuronal Platonist, Journal of Consciousness Studies5(5-6), pp. 706-717.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goodenough, O. R., & Tucker, M.(2010)Law and Cognitive Neuroscience, in: J.Hagan, K. L.Scheppele, & T. R.Tyker (red.) Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Volume 6. Palo Alto:Annual Reviews, pp. 61-92.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Greely, H. T., & Illes, J.(2007)Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation, American Journal of Law and Medicine33(2-3), pp. 377-431.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Greene, J., & Cohen, J.(2004)For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359(1451), pp. 1775-1785. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1546
    [Google Scholar]
30. Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D.(2001)An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment, Science293(5537), pp. 2105-2108.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hermans, W. F.(1966)Nooit meer slapen. Amsterdam:De Bezige Bij.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hyrtl, J. (1864/1897) Die Materialistische Weltanschauung unserer Zeit. Wien:Braumüller.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Illes, J., & Raffin, T. A.(2002)Neuroethics: an emerging new discipline in the study of brain and cognition, Brain and Cognition50(3), pp. 341-344.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Janich, P.(2009)Kein neues Menschenbild. Zur Sprache der Hirnforschung. Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kahane, G., & Shackel, N.(2008)Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?Nature452, E5.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kambam, P., & Thompson, C.(2009)The development of decision-making capacities in children and adolescents: psychological and neurological perspectives and their implications for juvenile defendants. Behavioral Sciences and the Law27(2), pp. 173-190. doi: 10.1002/bsl.859
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lamme, V.(2004)Weg met de psychologie!Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie59, pp. 91-110.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lamme, V.(2011)De vrije wil bestaat niet. Over wie er de echt de baas is in het brein. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Leefmann, J., Levallois, C., & Hildt, E.(2016)Neuroethics 1995-2012: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Guiding Themes of an Emerging Research Field, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience10(336). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00336
    [Google Scholar]
40. Meynen, G.(2010)Toerekeningsvatbaarheid. Over vrije wil, wetenschap en recht. Amsterdam: Wolf Legal Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Meynen, G.(2014)Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law. Review Essay, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice17(4), pp. 819-829. doi: 10.1007/s10677‑014‑9501‑4
    [Google Scholar]
42. Meynen, G.(2016)Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry, Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience41(1), pp. 3-5. doi: 10.1503/jpn.150317
    [Google Scholar]
43. Morse, S. J.(2007)The non-problem of free will in forensic psychiatry and psychology, Behavioral Sciences and the Law25(2), pp. 203-220. doi: 10.1002/bsl.744
    [Google Scholar]
44. O’Connor, C., Rees, G., & Joffe, H.(2012)Neuroscience in the public sphere, Neuron74(2), pp. 220-226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.004
    [Google Scholar]
45. Pandolfi, F. M.(1993)European decade of brain research, Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences14, pp. 395-397.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Pauen, M.(2004)Illusion Freiheit? Mögliche und unmögliche Konsequenzen der Hirnforschung. Frankfurt a. M.:S. Fischer.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Paus, T., Collins, D. L., Evans, A. C., Leonard, G., Pike, B., & Zijdenbos, A.(2001)Maturation of white matter in the human brain: A review of magnetic resonance studies, Brain Research Bulletin54(3), pp. 255-266. doi: 10.1016/s0361‑9230(00)00434‑2
    [Google Scholar]
48. Roskies, A.(2002)Neuroethics for the new millennium, Neuron35(1), pp. 21-23.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Roth, G.(1997)Das Gehirn und seine Wirklichkeit, 5. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Schleim, S. (2008a) Gedankenlesen – Pionierarbeit der Hirnforschung. Hannover: Heise Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Schleim, S. (2008b) Moral Physiology, Its Limitations and Philosophical Implications, Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik13, pp. 51-80.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Schleim, S.(2011)Die Neurogesellschaft: Wie die Hirnforschung Recht und Moral herausfordert. Hannover: Heise.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Schleim, S.(2012)Brains in context in the neurolaw debate: The examples of free will and "dangerous" brains, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry35(2), pp. 104-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schleim, S.(2015)The Half-Life of the Moral Dilemma Task: A Case Study in Experimental (Neuro-) Philosophy, in J.Clausen & N.Levy (red.) Handbook of Neuroethics. Dordrecht:Springer, pp. 185-199.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schleim, S. (2018a) Enhancement – een probleem van betekenis voor de neuro-ethiek?Podium voor Bio-ethiek24, pp. 12-15.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Schleim, S. (2018b) Subjective Experience, Heterophenomenology, or Neuroimaging? A Perspective on the Meaning and Application of Mental Disorder Terms, in Particular Major Depressive Disorder, Frontiers in Psychology9(702). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00702
    [Google Scholar]
57. Schleim, S.(2019)Die Crux mit den Diagnosen, Psychologie Heute1, pp. 58-62.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Schleim, S., & Roiser, J. P.(2009)fMRI in translation: the challenges facing real-world applications, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience3(63), pp. 1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schleim, S., Spranger, T. M., Erk, S., & Walter, H.(2011)From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience6(1), pp. 48-57. doi: Doi 10.1093/Scan/Nsq010
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schleim, S., Spranger, T. S., & Walter, H. (Eds.). (2009)Von der Neuroethik zum Neurorecht? Vom Beginn einer neuen Debatte. Göttingen:Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Singer, W.(2004). Verschaltungen legen uns fest. Wir sollten aufhören, von Freiheit zu sprechen, in: C.Geyer (red.), Hirnforschung und Willensfreiheit. Zur Deutung der neuesten Experimente. Frankfurt am Main.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Slors, M.(2012)Dat had je gedacht! Brein, bewustzijn en vrije wil in filosofisch perspectief. Amsterdam:Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Sperry, R. W.(1981)Changing Priorities, Annual Review of Neuroscience4, pp. 1-15.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Stern, B. H.(2001)Introduction to special issue on neurolaw, Neurorehabilitation 16(2), pp. 67-68.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Swaab, D. F.(2010)Wij zijn ons brein. Van baarmoeder tot alzheimer. Amsterdam:Atlas-Contact.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Taylor, J. S.(1995)Neurolaw – Towards a New Medical Jurisprudence, Brain Injury9(7), pp. 745-751. doi: 10.3109/02699059509008230
    [Google Scholar]
67. Taylor, J. S.(2001)An overview of neurolaw for the clinician: What every potential witness should know, Neurorehabilitation16(2), pp. 69-77.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Thompson, R. A., & Nelson, C. A.(2001)Developmental science and the media – Early brain development, American Psychologist56(1), pp. 5-15. doi: 10.1037//0003‑066x.56.1.5
    [Google Scholar]
69. van Aalderen, S., van Atteveldt, N. M., & Grol, M.(2015)Kijken in het brein. Mythen en mogelijkheden. Amsterdam:Querido.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Verplaetse, J.(2010)Zonder vrije wil. Een filosofische essay over verantwoordelijkheid. Amsterdam:Nieuwezijds.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Vincent, N. A.(2011)Legal responsibility adjudication and the normative authority of the mind sciences, Philosophical Explorations14(3), pp. 315-331. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2011.594937
    [Google Scholar]
72. Vincent, N. A.(2015)A Compatibilist Theory of Legal Responsibility, Criminal Law and Philosophy, 9(3), pp. 477-498. doi: 10.1007/s11572‑013‑9249‑2
    [Google Scholar]
73. Vogt, C.(1874)Physiologische Briefe. Gießen:Rickersche Buchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
74. von Liszt, F.(1906)Die Behandlung der vermindert Zurechnungsfähigen. 10. Internationale Versammlung der IKV zu Hamburg 1905, Mitteilungen 13, pp. 471-489.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Wegner, D.(2002)The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Weijers, I.(2018)Children and the law in the Netherlands. A comparative introduction. The Hague:Eleven.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Welberg, L.(2008)Neuroimaging: Free Will?Nature Reviews Neuroscience9(6), p. 410.
    [Google Scholar]