oa Conversational Agent Research Toolkit

References

1. Araujo, T.(2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions.Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barot, T.(2017). The future of news is humans talking to machines. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from Nieman Lab website: www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/the-future-of-news-is-humans-talking-to-machines/
3. Bickmore, T., & Gruber, A.(2010). Relational Agents in Clinical Psychiatry.Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673221003707538
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bickmore, T., & Picard, R. W.(2005). Establishing and Maintaining Long-term Human-computer Relationships.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 12(2), 293–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/1067860.1067867
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bocklisch, T., Faulker, J., Pawlowski, N., & Nichol, A.(2017). Rasa: Open source language understanding and dialogue management.ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1712.05181.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brandtzaeg, P., & Følstad, A. (2017, November 23). Why people use chatbots.Presented at the 4th International Conference on Internet Science, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Corti, K., & Gillespie, A.(2016). Co-constructing intersubjectivity with artificial conversational agents: People are more likely to initiate repairs of misunderstandings with agents represented as human.Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.039
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., & Ahrenberg, L.(1993). Wizard of Oz studies: Why and how.Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, 193–200. Retrieved from dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=169968
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dale, R.(2016). The return of the chatbots.Natural Language Engineering, 22(5), 811–817. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324916000243
   [Google Scholar]
10. Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T.(2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism.Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
    [Google Scholar]
11. Etemad-Sajadi, R.(2016). The impact of online real-time interactivity on patronage intention: The use of avatars.Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.045
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gilbert, C., & Hutto, E.(2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text.Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14). Available at (20/04/16) Http://Comp. Social. Gatech. Edu/Papers/Icwsm14. Vader. Hutto. Pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gunkel, D.(2012). Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the 21st Century.Communication+1, 1(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.7275/R5QJ7F7R
    [Google Scholar]
14. Guzman, A. L., & Lewis, S. C.(2019). Artificial intelligence and communication: A Human–Machine Communication research agenda.New Media & Society, 1461444819858691. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819858691
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ho, A., Hancock, J., & Miner, A. S.(2018). Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot.Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy026
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lichterman, J.(2016). Alexa, give me the news: How outlets are tailoring their coverage for Amazon’s new platform. Retrieved March 9, 2018, from Nieman Lab website: www.niemanlab.org/2016/08/alexa-give-me-the-news-how-outlets-are-tailoring-their-coverage-for-amazons-new-platform/
17. Olmstead, K. (2017, December 12). Nearly half of Americans use digital voice assistants, mostly on their smartphones. Retrieved December 27, 2017, from Pew Research Center website: www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/12/12/nearly-half-of-americans-use-digital-voice-assistants-mostly-on-their-smartphones/
18. Peter, J.(2018). New communication technologies and young people: The case of social robots.Youth and Media, 203–217. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sundar, S. S.(2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility.Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H., & Kim, H.-S.(2016). Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer Interaction Effects of Message Interactivity on User Engagement.Communication Research, 43(5), 595–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650214534962
    [Google Scholar]
21. Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., & van Dolen, W.(2014). Virtual Customer Service Agents: Using Social Presence and Personalization to Shape Online Service Encounters.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12066
    [Google Scholar]
22. Woolley, S. C., & Howard, P. N.(2016). Political Communication, Computational Propaganda, and Autonomous Agents — Introduction.International Journal of Communication, 10(0), 9.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Zarouali, B., Van den Broeck, E., Walrave, M., & Poels, K.(2018). Predicting Consumer Responses to a Chatbot on Facebook.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(8), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0518
    [Google Scholar]
24. Zhao, S.(2006). Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication.New Media & Society, 8(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806061951
    [Google Scholar]