De toekomst van werk: impact van technologie op organisaties (deel 2) | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 34, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0921-5077
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7235
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.1.002.RIET
2021-02-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/09215077/34/1/GO2021.1.002.RIET.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.1.002.RIET&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Georgiadou, A.(2020). Leading through social distancing: The future of work, corporations and leadership from home. Gender, Work, & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12533
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Couch, D. L., O’Sullivan, B., & Malatzky, C.(2020). What COVID-19 could mean for the future of ‘work from home’: The provocations of three women in the academy. Gender, Work & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12548
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deckmyn, D.(2019). Artificiële intelligentie dringt kunstwereld binnen: Is de computer de kunstenaar?De Standaard, 13 december 2019. https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20191212_04764635
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B.(2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Derous, E., & Rietzschel, E.(2020). De toekomst van werk: impact van technologie op organisaties (deel 1)Gedrag & Organisatie, 33, 273-278.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Guilford, J. P.(1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jacobs, R., Peters, P., De Ruiter, M., & Blomme, R.(2021). Het psychologische contract als dynamisch proces in complexe technologische contexten: inzichten uit de sociomaterialiteitstheorie. Gedrag & Organisatie, 34, 53-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Meylemans, L., Vanderstukken, A., Vereycken, Y., & Ramioul, M.(2021). Werknemersperspectief binnen Industrie 4.0: effect van technologiefuncties op gepercipieerde arbeidskwaliteit en bevlogenheid. Gedrag & Organisatie, 34, 79-106.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nauta, A., Sjollema, S., & Houtman, S.(2016). De omkering. Gedrag & Organisatie, 29, 187-190.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Orlikowski, W. J.(2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435-1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rijsdijk, J., Born, M. Ph., Koch, B., & Hiemstra, A. M. F.(2021). De validering van een virtual reality situationele beoordelingstest voor leidinggeven. Gedrag & Organisatie, 34, 107-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schultze, J., Schultze, M., West, S. G., & Krumm, S.(2017). The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required for face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: Similar or distinct constructs?Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 283-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9465-6
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Van Acker, B., Conradie, P. D., Parmentier, D. D., Joundi, J., Saldien, J., & Vlerick, P.(2021). Een exploratief onderzoek naar de accepteerbaarheid van industriële cobots bij (toekomstige) operatoren. Gedrag & Organisatie, 34, 13-51.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.1.002.RIET
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error