Ieder voordeel heeft z’n nadeel en omgekeerd: Verplicht thuiswerken en het welzijn van werkenden tijdens de eerste COVID-19 lockdown | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Gedrag & Organisatie
  4. Volume 34, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 34, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0921-5077
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7235
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Samenvatting

De COVID-19 pandemie veranderde onze manier van werken en organiseren drastisch. Zo verrichtten veel werkenden hun taken gedwongen vanuit huis, terwijl ook huisgenoten thuis moesten blijven. Vanuit de onderzochten we hoe de evaluatie/waardering van thuiswerk samenhangt met het welzijn (emotionele uitputting en vitaliteit) van thuiswerkers tijdens de eerste COVID-19 lockdown, en welke processen daarbij een rol spelen. Er is gekeken naar de voor- en nadelen van het thuiswerken, het coping potentieel en emoties als voorspellers van welzijn. Veronderstellingen zijn getoetst in een cross-sectioneel onderzoek bij 173 thuiswerkers. Zoals voorspeld door de liet coping potentieel sterke relaties met positieve en negatieve emoties zien. De ervaren voordelen van thuiswerk hingen samen met minder emotionele uitputting en de ervaren nadelen van thuiswerk met meer emotionele uitputting. Analyse liet verder twee paden zien: de voordelen van thuiswerk hingen via meer positieve emoties samen met meer vitaliteit, de nadelen van thuiswerk hingen via meer negatieve emoties samen met meer emotionele uitputting. Toepassing van biedt meer inzicht in de gunstige en ongunstige mechanismen achter de vastgestelde welzijnsgevolgen voor het COVID-19 thuiswerken. De resultaten hebben implicaties voor toekomstig onderzoek en de praktijk.

© Joris Van Ruysseveldt, Karen van Dam & Peter Verboon
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS
2021-11-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/09215077/34/4/GO2021.4.004.RUYS.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweitzer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychological Review, 30(2), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bick, A., Blandin, A., & Mertens, K. (2020). Work from home after the COVID-19 outbreak. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas; https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2017
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). A review of emotional labor and its nomological network: Practical and research implications. Ergonomia IJE&HF, 28(4), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2016.2-17
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Burić, I., & Macuka, I. (2018). Self-efficacy, emotions and work engagement among teachers: A two wave cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(7), 1917-1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9903-9
     [Google Scholar]
  7. CBS. (2020). ICT’ers werken het vaakst vanuit huis tijdens coronacrisis. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/nieuws/2020/33/ict-ers-werken-vaakst-vanuit-huis-tijdens-coronacrisis
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chesney, M. A., Neilands, T. B., Chambers, D. B.Taylor, J. M., & Folkman, S. (2006). A validity and reliability study of the coping self-efficacy scale. British Journal of Health Psychology, 11(3), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910705X53155
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Delahaij, R., & Van Dam, K. (2017). Coping with acute stress in the military: The influence of coping style, coping efficacy and appraisal emotions. Personality & Individual Differences, 119, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.021
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Delanoeije, J., & Verbruggen, M. (2019). The use of work-home practices and work-home conflict: Examining the role of volition and perceived pressure in a multi-method study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02362
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499-512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Desart, S., Schaufeli, W. B., & De Witte, H. (2017, februari20). Op zoek naar een nieuwe definitie van burn-out [Blog post]. https://kuleuvenblogt.be/2017/02/20/op-zoek-naar-een-nieuwe-definitie-van-burn-out
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Coping as a mediator of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 466-475. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.466
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fredrickson, B. L. (2016). The eudaimonics of positive emotions. In J.Vittersø (Ed.), Handbook of eudaimonic well-being (pp. 183-190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_12
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Fugate, M., Harrison, S., & Kinicki, A. J. (2011). Thoughts and feelings about organizational change: A field test of Appraisal Theory. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 18(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811416510
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fugate, M., Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (2012). Managing employee withdrawal during organizational change: The role of threat appraisal. Journal of Management, 38(3), 890-914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352881
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524-1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ganster, D. C., & Rosen, C. C. (2013). Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1085-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313475815
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerich, J. (2017). The relevance of challenge and hindrance appraisals of working conditions for employees’ health. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(3), 270-292. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000038
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In J. J.Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed., pp. 3-20). Guilford.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community: The psychology and philosophy of stress. Plenum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0115-6
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hooftman, W., Oude Hengel, K., Wiezer, N., Bouwens, L., Zoomer, T., & Vroome, E. (2020). De impact van de COVID-19 crisis op werknemers: Stand van zaken na de eerste golf. TNO, Leiden.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jimmieson, N. L., Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (2004). A longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: the role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.11
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Karasek, R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S.P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, … Van Vugt, M. (2020, August10). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lazarus, R. S. (2001). Relational meaning and discrete emotions. In K. R.Scherer, A.Schorr, & T.Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 37-67). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. McGraw-Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: a new synthesis. Free Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Levine, L. J. (1996). The anatomy of disappointment: A naturalistic test of appraisal models of sadness, anger, and hope. Cognition & Emotion, 10(4), 337-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999396380178
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Oreg, S., & Sverdlik, N. (2011). Ambivalence toward imposed change: the conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 337-349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021100
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Schaufeli, W. B., & van Wijhe, C. I. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope, and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(9), 1129-1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711429382
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., Varkulevičiūtė, K., & Stachová, K. (2020). Working from home – Who is happy? A Survey of Lithuania’s employees during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Sustainability, 12(13), 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135332
     [Google Scholar]
  38. R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Rudolph, C. W., Allan, B., Clark, M., Hertel, G., Hirschi, A., Kunze, F., Shockley, K., Shoss, M., Sonnentag, S., & Zacher, H. (2020, May22). Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in Industrial and Organizational psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k8us2Sardeshmukh, S. R., Sharma, D., & Golden, T. D. (2012). Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2003). Utrecht work engagement scale (UWES) preliminary manual [Version 1, November 2003]. Utrecht University: Occupational Health Psychology Unit.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020). Burn-out Assessment Tool (BAT)-Development, validity, and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2013). Het Job Demands-Resources model: Overzicht en kritische beschouwing. Gedrag & Organisatie, 26(2), 182-204. https://doi.org/10.5117/2013.026.002.182
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Schaufeli, W., & Van Rhenen, W. (2006). Over de rol van positieve en negatieve emoties bij het welbevinden van managers: Een studie met de Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JAWS). Gedrag & Organisatie, 19(4), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.5117/2006.019.004.002
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Schaufeli, W., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2000). UBOS, Utrechtse Burnout Schaal, Handleiding. Swets Test Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Scherer, K. R. (1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion, 7(3-4), 325-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939308409192
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion; Theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Siemer, M., Mauss, I., & Gross, J.J. (2007). Same situation – different emotions: How appraisals shape our emotions. Emotion, 7(3), 592-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.592
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Smith, C. A., & Kirby, L. D. (2009). Relational antecedents of appraised problem-focused coping potential and its associated emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(3), 481-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802009464
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith, C. A., Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 916-929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Dam, K., Oreg, S., & Sverdlik, N. (2019). Affective and cognitive responses to organizational change: The role of appraisal processes. Abstract from Emotions 2019, Tilburg, Netherlands.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Van Dam, K. (2016, June). The role of emotion regulation for employee adaptation to organizational change: The case of reappraisal and attentional deployment. EAWOP small group meeting ‘The psychology of organizational change: Understanding and dealing with change recipients’ reactions’. Athens, Greece.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Vander Elst, T., Verhoogen, R., Sercu, M., Van den Broeck, A., Baillien, E., & Godderis, L. (2017). Not extent of telecommuting, but job characteristics as proximal predictors of work-related well-being. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 59(10), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001132
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Van Leeuwen, K. A., Van Dam, K., & Van Ruysseveldt, J. (2019). Werkdruk: vriend of vijand? De rol van doeloriëntatie in de appraisal van werkdruk. Gedrag & Organisatie, 32(4), 225-249. https://doi.org/10.5117/2019.032.004.002
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.001
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Zacher, H., & Rudolph, C. W. (2021). Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(1), 50-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000702.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Zajonc, R. B. (1984). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS
Loading
Ieder voordeel heeft z’n nadeel en omgekeerd: Verplicht thuiswerken en het welzijn van werkenden tijdens de eerste COVID-19 lockdown
G&O 34 (2021); https://doi.org/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS
/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS
/content/journals/10.5117/GO2021.4.004.RUYS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Keyword(s): appraisal; coping potential; emotions; exhaustion; vitality

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error