Wat is van wie? | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 73, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0165-2346
  • E-ISSN: 2773-1847

Abstract

Abstract

What is whose? Ecological questions regarding the human use of space, air, precious metals and other natural resources make it necessary to reconsider the claim on property from a theological perspective. Whereas the modern mind takes a firm stand on property from an anthropocentric view, a biblically oriented approach relativizes any absolute claim on property and relates our use of resources to God as Giver and Sustainer of life.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.2.004.KOOI
2022-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Blaufarb, R. (2016). The Great Demarcation. The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bressler, R.D. (2021). The Mortality Cost of Carbon. Nature Communications, 12, 1-12.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Buckle, S. (1991). Natural Law and the Theory of Property. Grotius to Hume. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Claassen, R. (2020). Private eigendom, publieke macht. Op weg naar een nieuw feodalisme?Boom.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elkington, J. (2008). People-planet-profit. https://johnelkington.com/2008/06/people-planet-profit.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gray, K. & Gray, S.F. (2009). Elements of Land Law. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hagen, J. & Welker, M. (2014). Money as God? The Monetization of the Market and its Impact on Religion, Politics, Law, and Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. IPCC, Climate Change 2021. (2021) htpps://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/#SPM
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Locke, John (1689) Two Treatises on Government, htpps//www.thefederalistpapers.org.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Macpherson, C.B. (1962). The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Olthaar, M. & Schenderling, P. (2021) Hoe handel ik eerlijk. Skandalon.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Diepenhorst, P.A. (1933). De eigendom. Uitgeverij Kok.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Piketty, Th. (2020). Kapitaal en Ideologie. De Geus.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rendtorff, R. (2001). Theologie des Alten Testaments. Ein kanonischer Entwurf. Bd. 2: Thematische Entfaltung. Neukirchener Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Schweiker, W. & Welker, M. & Witte, J.jr. & Pickard, S. (eds). (2021). The Impact of Academic Research on Character Formation, Ethical Education and the Communi-cation of Values in Late Modern Pluralistic Societies. Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sverdrup, H. (2021) ‘Linking natural Resources, Population, Energy, Commodities, Services’. https://www.resourcewende.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Sverdrup ERF-2020-final-for-sharing.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Van der Kooi, C. (2012). Towards an ecologically responsible Theology. Journal of Reformed Theology
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Van Montfoort, T. (2020). Groene theologie. Skandalon.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Welker, M. (2012) God the Revealed. Christology. Eerdmans.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wilde, M.de. (2013). ”God hath given the world to men in common”. Grenzen aan privé-eigendom in geval van nood en verspilling in het middeleeuwse en vroegmoderne natuurrecht. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 42, 8-28.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Witte, Jr. & Welker, M. (2021). The Impact of Law on Character Formation, Ethical Education and the Communication of Values in Late Modern Pluralistic Societies. Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KT2022.2.004.KOOI
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error