Etnografisch onderzoek in de ‘eigen setting’: Twee opportunistische onderzoeken naar stigmatisering in Nederland | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. KWALON
  4. Volume 27, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 27 Number 3
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324

Abstract

Abstract

In this article, the authors discuss their own experiences with doing opportunistic ethnography: doing participant observations in a familiar setting in which you are already an ordinary participant. On the one hand, they elaborate on the advantages, such as skipping the time-consuming and uncertain challenge of getting access and gaining trust. On the other, they discuss some risks involved with this ‘at-home’ ethnography, such as not seeing the taken for granted and going native, while presenting some field work solutions to these problems. They conclude that opportunistic ethnography only works in specific social contexts, demands a specific attitude from the researcher and should more often be applied. In this way that unique access to settings is taken advantage of and the ordinary of everyday life is not being ignored.

© Abdessamad Bouabid & Ramón Romijn
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2022.3.013.BOUA
2022-12-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger. An informal introduction to ethnography. Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Agar, M. H. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvesson, M. (2003). Methodology for close up studies: struggling with closeness and closure. Higher Education, 46(2), 167–193.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvesson, M. (2009). At-home ethnography: struggling with closeness and closure. In Ybema, S., Yanow, D., Wels, H. & Kamsteeg, F. (Eds.), Organizational ethnography. Studying the complexities of everyday life (pp. 156-174). Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bouabid, A. (2018). De Marokkanenpaniek. Een geïntegreerde benadering van het stigma ‘Marokkaan’ in Nederland. Boom Criminologie.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Evers, J. (2015). Kwalitatieve analyse: kunst én kunde. Boom Lemma uitgevers.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Maesschalck, J. (2016). Methodologische kwaliteit in het kwalitatief onderzoek. In Decorte, T. & Zaitch, D. (Eds.), Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie (pp. 131-160). Acco.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Mortelmans, D. (2018). Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden. Acco.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Noaks, L. & Wincup, E. (2004). Criminological research. Understanding qualitative methods. London.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Riemer, J.W. (1977). Varieties of opportunistic research. Urban Life and Culture, 5(4), 467-478.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Romijn, R. (2021). People are strange when you are a stranger. Ongestructureerd socialiseren van buitenstaanders op en rondom het tankstation. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Waveland Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Zaitch, D., Mortelmans, D. & Decorte, T. (2016). Etnografie en participerende observatie. In Decorte, T. & Zaitch, D. (Eds.), Kwalitatieve methoden en technieken in de criminologie (pp. 255-319). Acco.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWA2022.3.013.BOUA
Loading
Keyword(s): at-home ethnography; opportunistic ethnography; Qualitative research; stigmatization

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error