Christenen in Bithynia-Pontus | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 54, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0165-8204
  • E-ISSN: 2667-1573

Abstract

Abstract

The famous letters by Pliny the Younger and emperor Trajan about the Christian community of Bithynia-Pontus have traditionally been highly significant in the study of early Christianity. However, the letters have often been read in isolation. The rest of the correspondence between emperor and governor contained in the tenth book of Pliny’s , meanwhile, has rarely been taken into account in a systematic way. This contribution will demonstrate that our understanding of the Christian letters is significantly enhanced by taking into account the underlying principles that shaped Roman provincial administration, and by placing Pliny’s interactions with the Christian community within the wider context of his duties as a Roman governor.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2021.3.003.JANS
2021-12-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/01658204/54/3/LAM2021.3.003.JANS.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2021.3.003.JANS&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ando, C. 2006. ‘The Administration of the Provinces’, in D.Potter (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to the Roman Empire, Oxford, 177–192.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ando, C. Aanstaand. ‘Petition and Response, Order and Obey. Contemporary models of Roman government’, in H.D.Baker, M.Jursa, B.Palme, S.Procházka en S.Tost (eds), Governing Ancient Empires. Proceedings of the 3rd to 5th International Conferences of the research Network Imperium and Officium, Wenen, 1-30.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes, T.D. 1968. ‘Legislation against the Christians’, Journal of Roman Studies58, 32-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes, T.D. 2010. Early Christian Hagiography and Roman History, Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bodel, J. 2015. ‘The Publication of Pliny’s Letters’, in I.Marchesi (ed.), Pliny the Book-Maker. Betting on posterity in the Epistles, Oxford, 13-108.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowman, A.K. 1996. ‘Provincial Administration and Taxation’, in A.K.Bowman, E.Champlin en A.Lintott (eds), The Cambridge Ancient History, volume 10. The Augustan Empire, 43 BC-AD 69, Cambridge, 344-370.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bowman, A.K., P.Garnsey en D.Rathbone (eds). 2000. The Cambridge Ancient History, volume 11. The High Empire, AD 70-192, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cook, J.G. 2010. Roman Attitudes Toward the Christians, Tübingen.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Coleman, K.M. 2012. ‘Bureaucratic Language in the Correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, Transactions of the American Philological Association142, 189-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Corke-Webster, J. 2017a. ‘The Early Reception of Pliny the Younger in Tertullian of Carthage and Eusebius of Caesarea’, Classical Quarterly67, 247-262.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Corke-Webster, J. 2017b. ‘Trouble in Pontus. The Pliny-Trajan correspondence on the Christians reconsidered’, Transactions of the American Philological Association147, 371-411.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dolganov, A. 2018. ‘Reichsrecht and Volksrecht in Theory and Practice. Roman law and litigation strategy in the province of Egypt (P. Oxy. II 237, P. Oxy. IV 706, SB XII 10929)’, in M.Jursa en H.Täuber (eds), Administration, Law and Administrative Law. Comparative studies in Imperial bureaucracy and officialdom, Wenen, 1-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Du Plessis, P.J., C.Ando en K.Tuori (eds). 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eck, W. 2000‘Provincial Administration and Finance’, in A.K.Bowman, P.Garnsey en D.Rathbone (eds), 266-292.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Finley, M.I. (ed.). 1974. Studies in Ancient Society, Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Frend, W.H.C. 2006. ‘Persecutions. Genesis and legacy’, in M.M.Mitchell en F.M.Young (eds), The Cambridge History of Christianity, volume 1. Origins to Constantine, Cambridge, 503-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuhrmann, C. 2012. Policing the Roman Empire, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Galsterer, H. 1996. ‘The Administration of Justice’, in A.K.Bowman, E.Champlin en A.Lintott (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, volume 10. The Augustan Empire, 43 BC-AD 69, Cambridge, 397-413.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Galsterer, H. 2000. ‘Local and Provincial Institutions and Government’, in A.K.Bowman, P.Garnsey en D.Rathbone (eds), 344-360.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gibson, R.K.2020. Man of High Empire. The life of Pliny the Younger, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson, R.K. en R.Morello. 2012. Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger. An introduction, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hall, J. 2009. Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hauken, T. 1988. Petition and Response. An epigraphic study of petitions to Roman emperors, Athene.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Harries, J. 2007. Law and Crime in the Roman World, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Humfress, C. 2013. ‘Law's Empire. Roman universalism and legal practice’, in P.J.du Plessis (ed.), New Frontiers. Law and society in the Roman world, Edinburgh, 73-101.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ibbetson, D. 2015. ‘Sources of Law from the Republic to the Dominate’, in D.Johnston (ed.), 25-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Johnston, D (ed.). 2015. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Keresztes, P. 1979. ‘The Imperial Roman Government and the Christian Church. I From Nero to the Severi’, in H.Temporini en G.G.W.Haasse (eds), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.23, Vorkonstantinisches Christentum. Verhältnis zu römischen Staat und heidnischer Religion, Berlijn, 247-315.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kokkinia, C. 2004. ‘Ruling, Inducing, Arguing. How to govern (and survive) a Greek province’, in L.de Ligt, E.A.Hemelrijk en H.W.Singor (eds), 39-58.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lane Fox, R. 1986. Pagans and Christians, Londen.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Liebs, D. 2012. Summoned to the Roman Courts, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ligt, L. de., E.A.Hemelrijk en H.W.Singor (eds). 2004. Roman Rule and Civic Life. Local and regional perspectives, Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lintott, A. 2015. ‘Crime and Punishment’, in D.Johnston (ed.), 301-331.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Mazzoli, G. 2003. ‘E Il Principe Risponde. Tra Penegirico e Libro X dell’Epistolario Pliniano’, in L.Castagna en E.Lefèvre (eds), Plinius der Jüngere und seine Zeit, München, 257-266.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Metzger, E. 2015. ‘Litigation’, in D.Johnston (ed.), 272-298.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Millar, F. 1977. The Emperor in the Roman World, Ithaca.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Millar, F. 2004. ‘Trajan. Government by Correspondence’, in F.Millar, M.Cotton en G.M.Rogers, Rome, the Greek World and the East, volume 2. Government, society and culture in the Roman Empire, Chapel Hill, 23-46.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mynors, R.A.B. 1968. C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri decem, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Noreña, C.F. 2007. ‘The Social Economy of Pliny’s Correspondence with Trajan’, American Journal of Philology128, 239-277.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Öhler, M. 2021. ‘Pliny and the Expansion of Christianity in Cities and Rural Areas of Pontus et Bithynia’, in M.Tiwald en J.K.Zangenberg (eds), Early Christian Encounters with Town and Countryside, Göttingen, 269-297.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Reichert, A. 2002. ‘Durchdachte Konfusion. Plinius, Trajan und das Christentum’, Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche93, 227-250.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richardson, J. 2016. ‘Provincial Administration’, in P.J.du Plessis, C.Ando en K.Tuori (eds), 111-123.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Robinson, O. 1995. The Criminal Law of Ancient Rome, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Roselaar, S.T. 2016. ‘Local Administration’, in P.J.du Plessis, C.Ando en K.Tuori (eds), 124-136.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rüfner, T. 2016. ‘Imperial Cognitio Process’, in P.J.du Plessis, C.Ando en K.Tuori (eds), 257-269.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sherwin-White, A.N. 1966. The Letters of Pliny. A historical and social commentary, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Sherwin-White, A.N. 1974. ‘Why Were the Early Christians Persecuted? An amendment’, in M.I.Finley (ed.), 250-255.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Slootjes, D. 2004. ‘The Governor as Benefactor in Late Antiquity’, in L.de Ligt, E.A.Hemelrijk en H.W.Singor (eds), 59-75.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stadter, P.A. 2006. ‘Pliny and the Ideology of Empire. The correspondence with Trajan’, Prometheus: Rivista quadrimestale di studi classici32, 61-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Ste Croix, G.E.M. de.1974a. ‘Why were the Early Christians Persecuted?’, in M.I.Finley (ed.), 210-249.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Ste Croix, G.E.M. de.1974b.‘Why were the Early Christians Persecuted? A rejoinder’, in M.I.Finley (ed.), 256-262.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus. Volume 2, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Taylor, T.S. 2016. ‘Social Status, Legal Status and Legal Privilege’, in P.J.du Plessis, C.Ando en K.Tuori (eds), 349-361.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Walsh, J. en G.Gottlieb. 1992. ‘Zur Christenfrage im zweiten Jahrhundert’, in G.Gottlieb en P.Barceló (eds), Christen und Heiden in Staat und Gesellschaft des zweiten bis vierten Jahrhunderts. Gedanken und Thesen zu einem schwierigen Verhältnis, München, 3-86.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Williams, T.B. 2012. Persecution in 1 Peter. Differentiating and contextualizing early Christian suffering, Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Woolf, G. 2006. ‘Pliny’s Pr0vince’, in T.Bekker-Nielsen (ed.), Rome and the Black Sea Region. Domination, Romanisation, resistance, Aarhus, 93-108.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2021.3.003.JANS
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/LAM2021.3.003.JANS
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error