oa Van Vluchteling tot Buurtgenoot

References

1. Aguirre, A.C. & Davies, S.G.(2015). Imperfect strangers: Picturing place, family, and migrant identity on Facebook. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 3–17.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allard, D.(2016). Translocal meaning making: Examining the information practices of migrants from the Philippines to Winnipeg. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 1–4.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Andersson, M.(2012)Media and migration through the lens of mediatization and transnationalism. (Bijdrage congres) universiteit van Malmő, verkregen van: https://dspace.mah.se/handle/2043/14879
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bello, V.(2014). Virtual belongings, dual identities and cultural discomforts: The role of Mediaspaces and Technospaces in the integration of migrants. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5(2-3), 213–229.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bilger, V. & van Liempt, I., (2009). Methodological and ethical dilemmas in research among smuggled migrants. In I.van Liempt & V.Bilger (red.), The Ethics of Migration Research Methodology: Dealing with Vulnerable Immigrants, (pp.118–137). Brighton: Sussex University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brun, C.(2001). Reterritorilizing the relationship between people and place in refugee studies. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 83(1), 15–25.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Byrne, D. & Goodall, H.(2013). Placemaking and Transnationalism: Recent Migrants and a National Park in Sydney, Australia. Parks, 19(1), 63–72.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cancellieri, A.(2015). Towards a progressive home-making: the ambivalence of migrants’ experience in a multicultural condominium. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 32(1), 1–13.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Castles, S. & Davidson, A.(2000). Citizenship and Migration: Globalization and the Politics of Belonging. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dekker, R. & Engbersen, G.(2014). How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration. Global Networks, 14(4), 401–418.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dinhopl, A. & Gretzel, U.(2016). Selfie-taking as touristic looking. Annals of Tourism Research, 57 (C), 126–139.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DSP-groep Amsterdam, Universiteit Tilburg(2016). Niets is wat het lijkt: Eritrese organisaties en integratie. Amsterdam: DSP-groep B.V.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Ehrkamp, P.(2005). Placing identities: Transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration studies, 31(2), 345–364.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fozdar, F. & Hartley, L.(2014). Housing and the creation of home for refugees in Western Australia. Housing, Theory and Society, 31(2), 148–173.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ghorashi, H.(2003). Iraanse vrouwen, transnationaal of nationaal? Een (de)territoriale benadering van ‘thuis’ in Nederland en de Verenigde Staten. Migrantenstudies, 3, 140–156.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ghorashi, H.(2014). Een verschuivende zoektocht naar het thuisgevoel. In: S.Dijkstra & L.van Doorn (red.) Een vreemde thuis in den vreemde (pp. 95–111). Utrecht: Stili Novi.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gibson, J.J.(1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gielis, R.(2009). A global sense of migrant places: towards a place perspective in the study of migrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 9(2), 271–287.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Haldrup, M. & Larsen, J.(2003). The family gaze. Tourist Studies, 3(1), 23–46.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hynes, P.(2011). The Dispersal and Social Exclusion of Asylum Seekers: Between Liminality and Belonging. Bristol: Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kim, H.S.(2016). What drives you to check in on Facebook? Motivations, privacy concerns, and mobile phone involvement for location-based information sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 397–406.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kissoon, P.(2006). Home/lessness as an indicator of integration: interviewing refugees about the meaning of home and accommodation. In B.Temple & R.Moran (red). Doing research with refugees: Issues and guidelines, (pp.75–96), Bristol: The Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kuschminder, K., de Bresser, J., & Siegel, M.(2015). Irregular migration routes to Europe and factors influencing migrants’ destination choices. Maastricht: Maastricht Graduate School of Governance.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Larsen, J.(2014). The Tourist Gaze 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0. In A.A.Lew, C.M.Hall & A.M.Williams (red.) The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Tourism (pp. 304–313). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Levitt, P. & Glick Schiller, N.(2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Li, W.W., Hodgetts, D., & Ho, E.(2010). Gardens, transitions and identity reconstruction among older Chinese immigrants to New Zealand. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(5), 786–796.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Leurs, K., Georgiou, M., McQuire, S., Vuoltenaaho, J., & Sumiala, J.(2015). The politics and praxis of media city research. A duo-interview with Myria Georgiou and Scott McGuire. Special issue on Media City. OBS* Observatorio, 9, 199–214.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Madianou, M. & Miller, D.(2013). Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Malkki, L.H.(1995). Refugees and exile: From" refugee studies" to the national order of things. Annual review of anthropology, 24(1), 495–523.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Martin, F. & Rizvi, F.(2014). Making Melbourne: Digital connectivity and international students’ experience of locality. Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1016–1031.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Massey, D.(1991). A global sense of place, Marxism Today (38),24–29.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Myers, M.(2011). Walking again lively: Towards an ambulant and conversive methodology of performance and research. Mobilities, 6(2), 183–201.
    [Google Scholar]
33. O’Neill, M. & Hubbard, P.(2010). Walking, sensing, belonging: Ethno-mimesis as performative praxis. Visual Studies, 25(1), 46–58.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Ponzanesi, S. & Leurs, K.(2014). On digital crossings in Europe. Crossings: Journal of Migration and Culture, 5 (1) 3–22.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rishbeth, C. & Finney, N.(2006). Novelty and nostalgia in urban greenspace: Refugee perspectives. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 97(3), 281–295.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Robertson, Z., Gifford, S., McMichael, C., & Correa-Velez, I.(2016). Through their eyes: seeing experiences of settlement in photographs taken by refugee background youth in Melbourne, Australia. Visual Studies, 31(1), 34–49.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ros, A., González, E., Marín, A., & Sow, P. (2007). Migration and information flows: A new lens for the study of contemporary international migration (UOC IN3 Working Paper)Series Vol. WP07. Verkregen van: http://www.uoc.edu/in3/dt/eng/ros_gonzalez_marin_sow.pdf
38. Rose, G.(2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (derde druk). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sampson, R. & Gifford, S.M.(2010). Place-making, settlement and well-being: The therapeutic landscapes of recently arrived youth with refugee backgrounds. Health & place, 16(1), 116–131.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schiller, N.G., Basch, L., & Blanc-Szanton, C.(1992). Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration. Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 645(1), 1–24.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Schrover, M. & Moloney, D.M. (Eds.) (2014). Gender, migration and categorisation: making distinctions between migrants in Western Countries, 1945-2010. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schwartz, R. & Halegoua, G.R.(2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1643–1660.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Siapera, E. & Veikou, M.(2013). Social Media Affordances and Migrant Political Practices, Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 12 (4), 100–119.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Urry, J. & Larsen, J.(2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Van Liempt, I.C. & Zijlstra, J.(2017). Smart(phone) travelling: understanding the use and impact of mobile technology on irregular migration journeys. International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, 3 (2-3) 174–191.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Van Riemsdijk, M.(2014). International migration and local emplacement: everyday place-making practices of skilled migrants in Oslo, Norway. Environment and Planning a, 46(4), 963–979.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Vertovec, S.(2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International migration review, 970–1001.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Volkmer, I. (Ed.) (2012). The handbook of global media research. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Walsh, K.(2006). British expatriate belongings: mobile homes and transnational homing. Home cultures, 3(2), 123–144.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Witteborn, S.(2015). Becoming (Im)Perceptible: Forced Migrants and Virtual Practice. Journal of Refugee Studies, feu036.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Witteborn, S.(2014). Forced migrants, emotive practice and digital heterotopia. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 5(1), 73–85.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Witteborn, S.(2012). Forced Migrants, New Media Practices, and the Creation of Locality, in The Handbook of Global Media Research (ed I.Volkmer), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]