Publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie1 | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 93, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0025-9454
  • E-ISSN: 1876-2816

Abstract

Abstract

The success of Airbnb and Uber has given rise to a public debate about the pros and cons of online sharing and gig platforms. This article reports on five case studies of platforms operating in car sharing (SnappCar), home sharing (Airbnb), home restaurants (Airdnd), ride hailing (UberPop) and cleaning (Helpling). The article then puts the sharing and gig economy into a historical perspective to highlight that the platforms build on pre-existing social practices. and presents a policy framework based on four basic policy options: enforce existing regulations, enact new regulations, deregulate, or tolerate.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN
2018-08-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00259454/93/3/02_MEM2018.3.FREN.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Benkler, Y.(2004). ’Sharing nicely’: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale Law Journal, 114, 273-358.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Codagnone, C., Biagi, F. & Abadie, F.(2016). The passions and the interests. Unpacking the ‘sharing economy’. JRC science for policy report. Brussel: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dijck, J. van, Poell, T. & de Waal, M.(2016). De platformsamenleving. Strijd om publieke waarden in een online wereld. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Edelman, B.G. & Luca, M.(2014). Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 14-054.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Europese Commissie (2016, 2juni). Een Europese agenda voor de deeleconomie. Brussel: Europese Commissie.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Frenken, K. (2017, 13november). Hoe kan de onduidelijke status van platformwerkers verhelderd worden?Me Judice, www.mejudice.nl.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Frenken, K. (2018, 22januari). Beleid in delen. Het beschermen van publieke belangen in de deel- en kluseconomie. Me Judice, www.mejudice.nl
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Frenken, K., Meelen, T., Arets, M. & Van de Glind, P. (2015, 27maart). Wat is nu eigenlijk deeleconomie?Me Judice, www.mejudice.nl.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Frenken, K., van Waes, A., Smink, M. & van Est, R. (2017). Eerlijk delen. Waarborgen van publieke belangen in de deeleconomie en de kluseconomie. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McKee, D. (2017). Neoliberalism and the legality of peer platform markets. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 105-113.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ministerie van Economische Zaken (2015). Ruimte voor vernieuwing door toekomstbestendige wet- en regelgeving (AEP / 15079841). Den Haag: Ministerie van Economische Zaken.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Petropoulos, G. (2017). An economic review of the collaborative economy. Policy Contribution no. 5, Brussels: Bruegel.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Schor, J. (2014). Debating the sharing economy: Great transition initiative. www.greattransition.org/publication/debating-the-sharing-economy
    [Google Scholar]
  14. TNO (2016). Nieuwe schatting van de omvang van de Nederlandse ‘Gig Economie’, https://www.tno.nl/media/7841/2016-22_factsheet_netherlands_platform_economie.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Van Noort, W. (2016, 28oktober). Als je baas een app is, NRC.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Slooten, J. (2017, 2juni). Ter visie: Platformarbeid: Nog een reden tot rethinking van het arbeidsrecht. Tijdschrift voor Arbeid en Onderneming, 2, 51-52.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/MEM2018.3.002.FREN
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airbnb; platform; regulation; sharing; Uber
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error