Legitimiteit van de politie: Over het belang van procedurele rechtvaardigheid in Nederland

References

1. Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Macmillan Education UK.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bolger, P. C., & Walters, G. D. (2019). The relationship between police procedural justice, police legitimacy, and people’s willingness to cooperate with law enforcement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60, 93-99.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119-170.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2018). Police legitimacy among immigrants in Europe: Institutional frames and group position. European Journal of Criminology, 15(5), 567-588.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braga, A. A., Winship, C., Tyler, T. R., Fagan, J., & Meares, T. L. (2014). The salience of social contextual factors in appraisals of police interactions with citizens: a randomized factorial experiment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(4), 599-627.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Broekhuizen, J., Van Kapel, M., Steketee, M., & Roetman, L. (2018). Vertrouwen in een rechtvaardige bejegening door de politie. Utrecht: Verwey-Jonker Instituut.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Broekhuizen, J., Van Stokkum, B., Schaap, D., Maier, D., Boutellier, H., & Boers, J. (2015). Serieus nemen: Over het vertrouwen van burgers in de Amsterdamse politie. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, M. L., & Reisig, M. D. (2019). Procedural injustice, police legitimacy, and officer gender: A vignette-based test of the invariance thesis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 37(6), 696-710.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coicaud, J. M. (2002). Legitimacy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Easton, D. (1965). A Framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Esaiasson, P., Persson, M., Gilljam, M., & Lindholm, T. (2019). Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 291-314.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gau, J. M. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(6), 489-498.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hinds, L., & Murphy, K. (2007). Public satisfaction with police: Using procedural justice to improve police legitimacy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 27-42.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust, and institutional legitimacy. Policing, 4(3), 203-210.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hough, M., Jackson, J. & Bradford, B. (2013). The drivers of police legitimacy: Some European research. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 8(2), 144-165.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S. R., Widdop, S., Fitzgerald, R., Yordanova, M., & Galev, T. (2011). Developing european indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 267-285.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012a). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051-1071.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, E., & Hohl, K. (2012b). Just authority? Public trust and police legitimacy. Oxon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jackson, J., & Gau, J. M. (2016). Carving up concepts? Differentiating between trust and legitimacy in public attitudes towards legal authority. In E.Shockley, T. M. S.Neal, L.PytlikZillig, & B.Bornstein (red.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration (pp. 49-69). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Johnson, D., Maguire, E. R., & Kuhns, J. B. (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law & Society Review, 48(4), 947-978.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kochel, T. R. (2017). Legitimacy judgements in neighborhood context: Antecedents in “good” vs “bad” neighborhoods. Policing: An International Journal, 40(3), 529-543.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kochel, T. R., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895-925.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research in organizational behavior, 24, 181–223.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Davis, J., Sargeant, E., & Manning, M. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(3), 245-274.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Murphy, K. (2017). Challenging the ‘invariance’ thesis: Procedural justice policing and the moderating influence of trust on citizens’ obligation to obey the police. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13, 429-437.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Murphy, K., Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2016). Motivating compliance behavior among offenders: Procedural justice or deterrence?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 102-118.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2011). Fostering cooperation with the police: How do ethnic minorities in Australia respond to procedural justice-based policing?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 235-257.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Murphy, K., Hinds, L., & Fleming, J. (2008). Encouraging public cooperation and support for police. Policing and Society, 18(2), 136-155.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Murphy, K., Mazerolle, L., & Bennett, S. (2014). Promoting trust in police: Findings from a randomised experimental field trial of procedural justice policing. Policing and Society, 24(4), 405-424.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Nix, J., Wolfe, S. E., Rojek, J., & Kaminski, R. J. (2015). Trust in the police: The influence of procedural justice and perceived collective efficacy. Crime & Delinquency, 61(4), 610-640.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Noppe, J., Verhage, A., Van der Vijver, K., & Kolthoff, E. (2019). Politie en legitimiteit. ‘s-Hertogenbosch: Gompel&Svacina.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Oliveira, T. R., Jackson, J., Murphy, K., & Bradford, B. (2021). Are trustworthiness and legitimacy ‘hard to win, easy to lose’? Longitudinal test of the asymmetry thesis of police-citizen contact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 37, 1003-1045
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pina-Sánchez, J., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2021). Are we equally persuaded by procedural justice? Re-examining the invariance thesis using longitudinal data and random effects. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Politieacademie. (2019). Strategische onderzoeksagenda voor de politie 2019-2022: Voor een effectievere politie en een veiligere samenleving. Apeldoorn: Politieacademie.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pryce, D. K., Johnson, D., & Maguire, E. R. (2017). Procedural justice, obligation to obey, and cooperation with police in a sample of Ghanaian immigrants. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(5), 733-755.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reiner, R. (2010). The Politics of the Police. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(8), 1005-1028.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Reisig, M. D., Flippin, M., Meško, G., & Trinkner, R. (2021). The effects of justice judgments on police legitimacy across urban neighborhoods: A test of the invariance thesis. Crime & Delinquency, 67(9), 1295-1318.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Reisig, M. D., & Lloyd, C. (2009). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and helping the police fight crime. Police Quarterly, 12(1), 42-62.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Reisig, M. D., Tankebe, J., & Meško, G. (2012). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and public cooperation with the police among young slovene adults. Journal of Criminal Justice & Security, 14(2), 147-164.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Ringeling, A., & Van Sluis, A. (2011). Verkenning naar het thema ‘gezag’. Apeldoorn: Politieacademie.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sampson, R. J., & Bartusch, D. J. (1998). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32(4), 777-804.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sargeant, E., Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2014). Ethnicity, trust and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model. European Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 500-524.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Schaap, D. (2018). The police, the public, and the pursuit of trust. Den Haag: Eleven international publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Sun, I. Y., Wu, Y., Hu, R., & Farmer, A. K. (2017). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does western wisdom hold in China?Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(4), 454-478.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter?Criminology, 47(4), 1265-1293.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103-135.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Terpstra, J. (2010). De maatschappelijke opdracht van de politie. Over identiteit en kernelementen van het politiewerk. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M.Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A review of research (pp. 431-505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84-99.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tyler, T. R. (2005). Policing in black and white: Ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 322-342.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 375-400.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Tyler, T. R., & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities?Ohio State Journal of Criminology, 6, 231-275.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 20(1), 78-95.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253-282.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Van Damme, A., & Pauwels, L. (2013). Naleving van de wet en medewerking van burgers met politie: (Alleen) een kwestie van procedurele rechtvaardigheid?Panopticon, 34(3), 182-203.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Van den Bos, K. (2000). Omgaan met onzekerheid: Het belang van rechtvaardigheid in organisaties. Gedrag en Organisatie, 13(5), 249-259.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 931-941.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness?The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(6), 1449-1458.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Van der Veer, L., van Sluis, A., van de Walle, S., & Ringeling, A. (2013). Vertrouwen in de politie: trends en verklaringen. Apeldoorn: Politie & Wetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Van der Vijver, K. (2006). Legitimiteit, gezag en politie; Een verkenning van hedendaagse dynamiek. In K.Van der Vijver & F.Vlerk (red.), Legitimiteit van de politie onder druk? Beschouwingen over grondslagen en ontwikkelingen van legitimiteit en legitimiteitstoekenning (pp. 115-132). Apeldoorn: Politie & Wetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Van Hall, M. (2021). Bereidheid om samen te werken met actoren in de strafrechtketen: de invloed van procedurele rechtvaardigheid in Nederland. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 63(1), 3-29.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Van Hall, M., Dirkzwager, A. J. E., Van der Laan, P. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2021). Procedurele rechtvaardigheid in de strafrechtketen: Hoe ervaren gedetineerden de bejegening door strafrechtactoren?Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 63(3), 317-346.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Van Kapel, M., Broekhuizen, J., & Steketee, M. (2019). Vertrouwen van jongeren in een rechtvaardige behandeling door de politie: Ervaren procedurele rechtvaardigheid, legitimiteit en zelfgerapporteerde criminaliteit onderzocht op basis van de ISRD-3. In J.Noppe, A.Verhage, K.Van der Vijver, & E.Kolthoff (red.), Politie en legitimiteit (pp. 73-98). ’s-Hertogenbosch: Gompel&Svacina.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Van Reenen, P. (2012). De effectiviteit van de politie en haar legitimiteit: studies tegen het licht gehouden. De stand van kennis en onderzoek, deel II. Apeldoorn: Politie & Wetenschap.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Walters, G. D., & Bolger, P. C. (2019). Procedural justice perceptions, legitimacy beliefs, and compliance with the law: a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15(3), 341-372.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Weyers, H., & Hertogh, M. (2007). Legitimiteit betwist: Een verkennend literatuuronderzoek naar de ervaren legitimiteit van het justitieoptreden. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
    [Google Scholar]
76. White, M. D., Mulvey, P., & Dario, L. M. (2016). Arrestees’ perceptions of the police: Exploring procedural justice, legitimacy, and willingness to cooperate with police across offender types. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 343-364.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Wolfe, S. E., Nix, J., Kaminski, R., & Rojek, J. (2016). Is the effect of procedural justice on police legitimacy invariant? Testing the generality of procedural justice and competing antecedents of legitimacy. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 253-282.
    [Google Scholar]
78. ZahnowR., Mazerolle, L., & Pang, A. (2021). Do individual differences matter in the way people view police legitimacy? A partial replication and extension of invariance thesis. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(2), 665-685.
    [Google Scholar]