oa Het einde van het Poldernederlands?^*

References

1. Bezooijen, Renée van(1999). Onderzoekscollege naar de waarneming van het Poldernederlands. VDW-berichten5, 30-32.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn(2005). Listener Perceptions of Sociolinguistic Variables: The Case of (ING). Proefschrift Stanford University.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Coupland, Nikolas & ToreKristiansen(2011). SLICE: Critical perspective on language (de)standardisation. In: ToreKristiansen & NikolasCoupland (red.), Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Oslo: Novus Press, 11-35.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bezooijen, Renée van & Robvan den Berg(2001). Who power Polder Dutch? A perceptual-sociolinguistic study of a new variety of Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands18, 1-12.
   [Google Scholar]
5. D’Onofrio, Annette(2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics19(2), 241-256.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Drager, Katie(2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language and Linguistics Compass4(7), 473-480.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Edelman, Loulou(1999). Het Poldernederlands: een vrouwentaal? Een sociolinguïstisch onderzoek. <cf.hum.uva.nl/poldernederlands/over_poldernederlands/een_vrouwentaal.html>
   [Google Scholar]
8. Edelman, Loulou(2003). ‘Kaaik aut Paaul!’ Het Poldernederlands in opmars. In: J.Stroop (red.), Waar gaat het Nederlands naar toe? Panorama van een taal. Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker, 65-73.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie, StevenDelarue & ChloéLybaert(2016). Studying standard language dynamics in Europe. Taal en Tongval68, 75-91.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Grondelaers, Stefan & Roelandvan Hout(2011). The standard language situation in the Low Countries: Top-down and bottom-up variations on a diaglossic theme. Journal of Germanic Linguistics23, 199-243.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grondelaers, Stefan, Roelandvan Hout & Paulvan Gent(2016). Destandardization is not destandardization. Revising standardness criteria in order to revisit standard language typologies in the Low Countries. Taal en Tongval68, 119-149.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Harst, Sander van der & Hansvan de Velde(2014). Wordt leggen schijnbaar of werkelijk liggen? In: F.Van de Velde, H.Smessaert, F.Van Eynde, and S.Verbrugge (red.), Patroon en argument: een dubbelfeestbundel bij het emeritaat van William Van Belle en Joop van der Horst. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven, 313-326.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Heuven, Vincent van, LoulouEdelman & Renéevan Bezooijen(2002). The pronunciation of /Ei/ by male and female speakers of avant-garde Dutch. Referaat TIN-dag Utrecht, 26 januari 2002. <cf.hum.uva.nl/poldernederlands/english/lin_polder.htm>
    [Google Scholar]
14. Heuven, Vincent van, Renéevan Bezooijen & LoulouEdelman(2005). Pronunciation of /ei/ in Avant-Garde Dutch: A Cross-Sex Acoustic Study. In: M.Filppula, J.Klemola, M.Palander, and E.Penttilä (red.), Dialects Across Borders; Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology (Methods XI), Joensuu, August 2002. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 185-210.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Jacobi, Irene(2009). On Variation and Change in Diphthongs and Long Vowels of Spoken Dutch. Enschede: PrintPartners Ipskamp. Proefschrift Universiteit van Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jacobi, Irene, LouisPols & JanStroop(2006). Measuring and comparing vowel qualities in a Dutch spontaneous speech corpus. Interspeech7, 701-704.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jacobi, Irene, LouisPols & JanStroop(2007). Dutch diphthong and long vowel realizations as socio-economic markers. Procedures International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 10 August 2007, Saarbrücken, 1481-1484.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jarosz, Andrew & JenniferWiley(2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving7(1), 2-9.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kristiansen, Tore(2016). Contemporary standard language change. Weakening or strenthening?Taal en Tongval, 68, 93-117.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lambert, Wallace, RichardHodgson, RobertGardner & SamuelFillenbaum(1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology60(1), 44.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lee, Michael & Eric-JanWagenmakers(2014). Bayesian Data Analysis for Cognitive Science: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Levon, Erez(2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass9(7), 295-308.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lippi-Green, Rosina(2012). English with an Accent. Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Londen & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Niedzielski, Nancy(1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(1), 62-85.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Perneger, Thomas(1998). What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. BMJ : British Medical Journal316(7139), 1236-1238.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pharao, Nicolai, MarieMaegaard, JanusMøller & ToreKristiansen(2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society43(1), 1-31.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Rutten, Gijsbert(2019). Language Planning as Nation Building. Ideology, policy and implementation in the Netherlands, 1750-1850. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Smakman, Dick(2006). Standard Dutch in the Netherlands: A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. Utrecht: LOT.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Stroop, Jan(1998). Poldernederlands. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stroop, Jan(1999). Young women’s farewell to Standard Dutch. Paper Conference on Methods in Dialectology, 1-6 August 1999, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. <cf.hum.uva.nl/poldernederlands/over_poldernederlands/stjohnspaper.html>
    [Google Scholar]
31. Stroop, Jan(2006). Van dialect naar ABN naar Poldernederlands. Over ontstaan, opkomst en verloop van onze omgangstaal. In: N.van der Sijs, J.Stroop, and F.Weerman (red.), Wat iedereen van het Nederlands moet weten en waarom, Amsterdam: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker, 55-65.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Stroop, Jan(2010). Hun hebben de taal verkwanseld. Over Poldernederlands & fouter Nederlands. Amsterdam: Athenaeum-Polak & van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Tamminga, Meredith(2017). Matched guise effects can be robust to speech style. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America142(1), EL18-EL23.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Velde, Hans van de, MikhailKissine, EvieTops, Sandervan der Harst & Roelandvan Hout(2010). Will Dutch become Flemish? Autonomous developments in Belgian Dutch. Multilingua29, 385-416.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Villarreal, Daniel(2018). The Construction of Social Meaning: A Matched-Guise Investigation of the California Vowel Shift. Journal of English Linguistics46(1), 52-78.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan(2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14(5), 779-804.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Walker, Abby, ChristinaGarcía, YomiCortés & KathrynCampbell-Kibler(2014). Comparing social meanings across listener and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish /s/. Language Variation and Change26(2), 169-189.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zahn, Christopher & RobertHopper(1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology4, 113-123.
    [Google Scholar]