oa De verleidingen en gevaren van GrETEL^*

References

1. Augustinus, Liesbeth, Schuurman, Ineke, Vandeghinste, Vincent & Van Eynde, Frank(2014). GrETEL. Searching for breadcrumbs in texts (CLARIN Educational Module). Centre for Computational Linguistics KU Leuven. <dev.clarin.nl/sites/default/files/EducationalModule-v4b.pdf>
   [Google Scholar]
2. Augustinus, Liesbeth(2015). Complement raising and cluster formation in Dutch. A treebank-supported investigation. Doctoraal proefschrift KU Leuven.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bloem, Jelke(2016). Evaluating automatically annotated treebanks for linguistic research. In: P.Bański, M.Kupietz, H.Lüngen, A.Witt, A.Barbaresi, H.Biber, E.Breiteneder & S.Clematide (red.), Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC 4). Paris: ELRA, 8-14. <www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2016/workshops/LREC2016Workshop-CMLC Proceedings.pdf>
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bouma, Gosse, J.M.van Koppen, FrankLandsbergen, JanOdijk, Tonvan der Wouden & Matjevan de Camp(2015). Enriching a descriptive grammar with treebank queries. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories 14 (TLT14), 13-25.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Edelman, Shimon & Morten H.Christiansen(2003)How seriously should we take Minimalist syntax?Trends in Cognitive Science7, 60-61.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Featherston, Sam.(2009). Relax, lean back, and be a linguist. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft28(1), 127-132.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Gibson, Edward & EvelinaFedorenko.(2010). Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Science14, 233-234.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Gibson, Edward, StevenT. Piantadosi & EvelinaFedorenko(2013). Quantitative methods in syntax/semantics research: A response to Sprouse and Almeida (2013). Language and Cognitive Processes28(3), 229-240.
   [Google Scholar]
9. CharlesJ. Fillmore(1992). ‘Corpus linguistics’ or ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In: JanSvartvik (red.), Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 35-60.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Hoekstra, Heleen, MichaelMoortgat, BramRenmans, MachteldSchouppe, InekeSchuurman & Tonvan der Wouden(2003). CGN syntactische annotatie. CGN report Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kampen, Jacqueline van(2009). The non-biological evolution of grammar: Wh-question formation in Germanic. Biolinguistics3(2-3), 154-185.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Langendoen, D. Terence(1973). The problem of linguistic theory in relation to language behavior: A tribute and reply to Paul Goodman. Daedalus102(3), 195-201.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Linzen, Tal & YoheiOseki(2018). The reliability of acceptability judgments across languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics3(1), 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Noord, Gertjan van, InekeSchuurman & GosseBouma(2011). Lassy syntactische annotatie (revision 19455). Lassy report, RU Groningen. <https://www.let.rug.nl/vannoord/Lassy/sa-man_lassy.pdf>
    [Google Scholar]
15. Odijk, Jan(2015). Linguistic research with PaQU. Computational Linguistics in The Netherlands Journal5, 3-14.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Odijk, Jan (2016a). Linguistic research using CLARIN. Lingua178, 1-4.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Odijk, Jan (red.) (2016b). Linguistic research in the CLARIN infrastructure. Lingua178.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Odijk, Jan (2016c). A use case for linguistic research on Dutch with CLARIN. In: K.De Smedt (red.), Selected Papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2015 (Vol. 123). Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 45-61.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Odijk, Jan(2018). Boosting linguistic research with CLARIN. Lezing op ESSLLI 2018, Sofia (Bulgarije), 14 augustus 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Odijk, Jan, AlexisDimitriadis, Martijnvan der Klis, Marjovan Koppen, MeieOtten & Remcovan de Veen (2018a). The AnnCor CHILDES Treebank. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. Paris: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2275-2283.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Odijk, Jan & A.van Hessen (red.) (2017). CLARIN in the Low Countries. London: Ubiquity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Odijk, Jan, M.van der Klis & S.Spoel (2018b). Extensions to the GrETEL Treebank Query Application. In: E.Bejcek (red.), Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT16). Praag: Charles University, 46-55.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Odijk, Jan, Gertjanvan Noord, P.Kleiweg & ErikTjong Kim Sang(2017). The Parse and Query (PaQu) application. In: J.Odijk, & A.van Hessen (red.), CLARIN in the Low Countries. London, UK: Ubiquity Press, 281-297.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Oostdijk, Nelleke, MartinReynaert, VeroniqueHoste & InekeSchuurman(2013). The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch. In: P.Spyns & J.Odijk (red.), Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Phillips, C.(2010). Should we impeach armchair linguists?Japanese/Korean Linguistics17, 49-64.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Phillips, C. & H.Lasnik(2003). Linguistics and empirical evidence: Reply to Edelman and Christiansen. Trends in Cognitive Sciences7(2), 61-62.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pullum, Geoffrey(2017). Theory, data, and the epistemology of syntax. In: M.Konopka & A.Wöllstein (red.), Grammatische Variation: Empirische Zugänge und theoretische Modellierung. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 283-298.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schütze, Carson T.(1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schütze, Carson T.(2016). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Spyns, Peter & JanOdijk (red.) (2013). Essential speech and language technology for Dutch. Results by the STEVIN-programme. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Van Eynde, Frank(2009). A treebank-driven investigation of predicative complements in Dutch. An efficient, practical, actually usable approach. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 2009 - Selected Papers from the 19th CLIN Meeting, CLIN 2009, 131-145.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Van Eynde, Frank, LiesbethAugustinus & VincentVandeghinste(2016). Number agreement in copular constructions: A treebank-based investigation. Lingua178, 104-126.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Wasow, Thomas and JenniferE. Arnold, (2005). Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua115, 1481-1496.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Wouden, Ton van deret al. (2016a). Het Taalportaal. Een nieuwe wetenschappelijke grammatica voor het Nederlands en het Fries (en het Afrikaans). Nederlandse Taalkunde21(1), 157-168.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Wouden, Ton van der, GosseBouma, Matjevan de Camp, Marjovan Koppen, FrankLandsbergen & JanOdijk (2016b). Enriching a grammatical database with intelligent links to linguistic resources. In: K.De Smedt (red.), Selected Papers from the CLARIN Annual Conference 2015. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 108-117.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wouden, Ton van der, GosseBouma, Matjevan de Camp, Marjovan Koppen, FrankLandsbergen & JanOdijk(2017). Enriching a scientific grammar with links to linguistic resources: The Taalportaal. In: J.Odijk & A.van Hessen (red.), CLARIN in the Low Countries. London: Ubiquity Press, pp. 299-310.
    [Google Scholar]