oa Sociale betekenis en taalvariatie in luisterverhalen voor Vlaamse kinderen

References

1. Agha, A.(2003). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication23, 231-273.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, J. (2012a). Introduction: Language and society in cinematic discourse. Multilingua 31, 139-154.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Androutsopoulos, J. (2012b). Repertoires, characters, and scenes: Sociolinguistic difference in Turkish-German comedy. Multilingua 31, 301-326.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Auer, P.(2005). Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In: N.Delbecque, J.van der Auwera & D.Geeraerts (red.), Perspectives on variation. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 7-42.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Auer, P.(2011). Dialect vs. standard: A typology of scenarios in Europe. In: B.Kortmann & J.Van der Auwera (red.), The languages and linguistics of Europe. A comprehensive guide. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 485-500.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bednarek, M.(2010). The language of fictional television. London/New York: Continuum.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bleichenbacher, L.(2008). Multilingualism in the movies. Hollywood characters and their language choices (Swiss Studies in English). Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verla.
   [Google Scholar]
8. van Bork, G., D.Delabastita, P.Verkuijsse & G.Vis (2012a). Antagonist. Algemeen letterkundig lexicon. <www.dbnl.org/tekst/dela012alge01_01/dela012alge01_01_02662.php?q= protagonist#hl1>
   [Google Scholar]
9. van Bork, G., D.Delabastita, P.Verkuijsse & G.Vis (2012b). Protagonist. Algemeen letterkundig lexicon. <www.dbnl.org/tekst/dela012alge01_01/dela012alge01_01_00728.php?q= antagonist#hl1>
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bubel, C.(2008). Film audiences as overhearers.Journal of Pragmatics40, 55-71.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Caluwe, J.(2004). Conflicting language conceptions within the Dutch speaking part of Belgium. Trans: Internet-Zeitschrift für Kulturwissenschaften15, 53-58.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chevrot, J.-P., A.Nardy & S.Barbu. (2011). Developmental dynamics of SES-related differences in children’s production of obligatory and variable phonological alternations. Language Sciences33(1), 180-191.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Coupland, N.(2007). Style: Language variation and identity (Key topics in sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Culpeper, J.(2001). Language and characterization: People in plays and other texts. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Delarue, S.(2014). Contrasterende (standaard)taalideologieën bij Vlaamse leerkrachten: een Gentse casestudy. Handelingen van de koninklijke maatschappij voor taal- en letterkunde en geschiedenis67, 219-248.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Devos, M., & R.Vandekerckhove(2005). West-Vlaams. Tielt: Lannoo.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Eckert, P.(2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4), 453-476.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Foulkes, P., & G.Docherty(2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language81(1), 177-206.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Geeraerts, D., V.Penne & V.Vanswegenoven(2000). Thuis-taal en Familie-taal: taalgebruik in Vlaamse soaps. In: S.Gillis, J.Nuyts & J.Taeldeman (red.), Met taal om de tuin geleid. Opstellen voor Georges De Schutter. Antwerpen: UIA, 161-170.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ghimenton, A., J.-P.Chevrot & J.Billiez(2013). Language choice adjustments in child production during dyadic and multiparty interactions: a quantitative approach to multilingual interac­tions. Linguistics 51(2), 413-438.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ghyselen, A.-S.(2016). Verticale structuur en dynamiek van het gesproken Nederlands in Vlaanderen: een empirische studie in Ieper, Gent en Antwerpen. Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Gent.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ghyselen, A.-S., & G.De Vogelaer(2018). Seeking systematicity in variation: Theoretical and 
methodological considerations on the "variety" concept. Frontiers in Psychology9, 385.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Grondelaers, S., & P.Van Gent(2019). How “deep” is dynamism? Revisiting the evaluation of Moroccan-flavored Netherlandic. Linguistics Vanguard5(1).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Grondelaers, S., & R.Van Hout(2010). Is Standard Dutch with a regional accent standard or not? Evidence from native speakers’ attitudes. Language Variation and Change22, 221-239.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Grondelaers, S., R.Van Hout & D.Speelman(2011). A perceptual typology of standard language situations in the Low Countries. In: T.Kristiansen & N.Coupland (red.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe. Oslo: Novus press, 199-222.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Grondelaers, S., R.Van Hout & M.Steegs. (2010). Evaluating regional accent variation in Standard Dutch. Journal of Language and Social Psychology29(1), 101-116.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Grondelaers, S., & D.Speelman(2013). Can speaker evaluation return private attitudes towards stigmatised varieties? Evidence from emergent standardisation in Belgian Dutch. In: S.Grondelaers & T.Kristiansen (red.), Language (de)standardisation in late modern Europe: Experimental studies. Oslo: Novus Press, 171-192.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Van Hoof, S.(2013). Feiten en fictie: een sociolinguïstische analyse van het taalgebruik in fictieseries op de Vlaamse openbare omroep (1977-2012). Universiteit Antwerpen. Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Antwerpen.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Van Hoof, S.(2015). Feiten en fictie: Een sociolinguïstische analyse van het taalgebruik in fictiereeksen op de Vlaamse openbare omroep (1977-2012). Gent: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. De Houwer, A.(2003). Language variation and local elements in family discourse. Language Variation and Change15, 329-349.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Impe, L., & D.Speelman(2008). Vlamingen en hun (tussen)taal. Een attitudineel mixed guise-onderzoek. Handelingen van de Koninklijke Maatschappij Voor Taal- En Letterkunde En Geschiedenis16, 129-153.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Jefferson, G.(2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introductions. In G. H.Lerner (red.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 13-31.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kerswill, P., & A.Williams(2000). Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society29(1), 65-115.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kristiansen, T.(2009). The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia41(1), 167-192.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lambert, W. E., R. C.Hodgson, R.Gardner & S.Fillenbaum(1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken language. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology60(1), 44-51.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lenz, A.(2010). Emergence of varieties through restructuring and reevaluation. In: P.Auer & J. E.Schmidt (red.), Language and space. An international handbook of linguistic variation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter, 295-315.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lippi-Green, R.(1997). Teaching children to discriminate. What we learn from the Big Bad Wolf. In: English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. Londen/New York: Routledge, 79-103.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lybaert, C.(2017). A direct discourse-based approach to the study of language attitudes: The case of tussentaal in Flanders. Language Sciences59, 93-116.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Maegaard, M.(2005). Language attitudes, norm and gender: A presentation of the method and results from a language attitude study. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia37, 55-80.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Mesthrie, R.(2005). Assessing representations of South African Indian English in writing: An application of variation theory. Language Variation and Change17, 303-326.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Van De MieroopD., E.Zenner & S.Marzo(2016). Standard and Colloquial Belgian Dutch pronouns of address: A variationist-interactional study of child-directed speech in dinner 
table interactions. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae50(1), 31-64.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Miller, K.(2013). Acquisition of variable rules: /s/-lenition in the speech of Chilean Spanish-speaking children and their caregivers. Language Variation and Change25(3), 311-340.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Plevoets, K.(2009). Verkavelingsvlaams als de voertaal van de verburgerlijking van Vlaanderen. Studies van de Belgische Kring Voor Linguïstiek, 4.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Propp, V.(1997). De morfologie van het toversprookje: vormleer van een genre. Utrecht: Spectrum.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Richardson, K.(2010). Television dramatic dialogue: a sociolinguistic study. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Roberts, J. & W.Labov(1995). Learning to talk Philadelphian. Language Variation and Change7, 101-122.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Ryan, E. B., & M. A.Carranza (1975). Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31(5), 855-863.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Ryan, E. B., H.Giles & M.Hewstone(1988). The measurement of language attitudes. In: U.Ammon, N.Dittmar & K.Mattheier (red.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik (Vol. 2).Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1068-1081.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Schmidt, J. E.(2005). Versuch zum Varietätenbegriff. In: A.Lenz & K.Mattheier (red.), Varietäten – Theorie und Empirie. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, 61-74.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Silverstein, M.(2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication23(3-4), 193-229.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Smith, J., & M.Durham(2019). Sociolinguistic variation in children’s language: Acquiring community norms (Studies in language variation and change). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Smith, J., M.Durham & L.Fortune(2007). Mam, my trousers is fain doon!: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change19(1), 63-99.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Smith, J., M.Durham & H.Richards(2013). The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic norms: Caregivers, children, and variation. Linguistics51(2), 285-324.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Stokoe, E.(2008). Dispreferred actions and other interactional breaches as devices for occasion­ing audience laughter in television “sitcoms”. Social Semiotics18(3), 289-307.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Stuart-Smith, J.(2011). The view from the couch: Changing perspectives on the role of television in changing language ideologies and use. In: T.Kristiansen & N.Coupland (red.), Standard languages and language standard in a changing Europe. Oslo: Novus, 223-239
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tagliamonte, S.(2014). Situating media influence in sociolinguistic context. Journal of Sociolinguistics18(2), 223-232.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Treiman, D. J.(1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Vandekerckhove, R.(2009). Dialect loss and dialect vitality in Flanders. International Journal of the Sociology of Language196, 73-97.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Vandekerckhove, R., & P.Cuvelier(2007). The perception of exclusion and proximity through the use of Standard Dutch, “tussentaal” and dialect in Flanders. In: P.Cuvelier, T.Du Plessis, M.Meeuwis & L.Teck (red.), Multilingualism and exclusion, policy, practice and prospects. Pretoria: Van Schaik, 241-256.
    [Google Scholar]
60. De Vogelaer, G., & M.Katerbow(2017). Acquiring sociolinguistic variation (Studies in language variation Volume 20). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
61. De Wachter, L., & J.Heeren(2010). Taalvariatie in enkele ‘Nederlandse’ en ‘Vlaams gesproken’ animatiefilms. In: E.Hendrickx, K.Hendrickx, W.Martin, H.Smessaert, W.Van Belle & J.Van der Horst (red.), Liever meer of juist minder? Over normen en variatie in taal. Gent: Academia press, 147-161.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Walker, A., C.García, Y.Cortés & K.Campbell-Kibler(2014). Comparing social meanings across listener and speaker groups: The indexical field of Spanish /s/. Language variation and change26(2), 169-189.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Zahn, C. J., & R.Hopper(1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument. Journal of Language and Social Psychology4(2), 113-123.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Žárská, L.(2019). Translation of language varieties in the Flemish dubbing of Harry Potter III. Theory and Practice in English Studies8(1), 23-34.
    [Google Scholar]