Dirk Geeraerts en de diachrone semantiek

References

1. Dik, S.C. (1977). Inductive generalizations in semantic change. In: P.Hopper (red.), Studies in descriptive and historical linguistics: A festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-300.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Dowty, D.R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language67, 547-619.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Geeraerts, D. (1985). Preponderantieverschillen bij bijna-synoniemen. De Nieuwe Taalgids78, 18-27.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Geeraerts, D. (1997). Diachronic prototype semantics. A contribution to historical lexicology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Geeraerts, D. (2009). Where does prototypicality come from? In: D.Geeraerts (red.), Words and Other Wonders. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 27-47.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Geeraerts, D. (2014). Four guidelines for diachronic metaphor research. In: Javier E. Díaz-Vera (red.), Metaphor and metonymy across time and cultures. Perspectives on the sociohistorical linguistics of figurative language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 15-28.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Geeraerts, D. & A.Moerdijk (1983). Toetsing van een modeltheoretisch geïnspireerde morfologie. Spektator13, 88-104.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Geeraerts, D. & S.Grondelaers (1995). Looking back at anger. Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In: J.Taylor & R.E.MacLaury (red.), Language and the construal of the world. Berlin/NewYork: de Gruyter Mouton, 153-180.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Giannakidou, A. (2011). Negative and positive polarity items. In: K.von Heusinger, C.Maienborn & P.Portner (red.), Semantics. Vol. 2. Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of linguistics and communication science. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1660-1712.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gibbs Jr, R. W. (1986). Skating on thin ice: Literal meaning and understanding idioms in conversation. Discourse processes9(1), 17-30.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Gibbs Jr, R. W., N.P.Nayak & C.Cutting (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of memory and language28(5), 576-593.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in cognitive sciences7(2), 92-96.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hoeksema, J. & T.van der Wouden (2020). On the Dutch temporal adverbial goed en wel. In: E.Tribushinina & M.Dingemanse (red.), Linguistics in the Netherlands37, 90-102.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hoeksema, J. (2009). The swarm alternation revisited. In: E.Hinrichs & J.Nerbonne (red.), Theory and evidence in semantics. CSLI, Stanford, 53-80.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kamp, H. & B.Partee (1995). Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition57, 129-191.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Lakoff, G. (1982). Categories and cognitive models. Trier: L.A.U.T.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lakoff, G. (2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lakoff, G. & M.Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Moerdijk, A. & D.Geeraerts (1983). Lexicale semantiek en morfologische betekenisbeschrijving. De Nieuwe Taalgids76(6), 517-531.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Moortgat, M. & H.van der Hulst (1981). Geïnterpreteerde morfologie. Glot4, 179-214.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Odijk, J., G.van Noord, P.Kleiweg & E.Tjong Kim Sang (2017). The parse and query (PaQu) application. In: J.Odijk & A.van Hessen (red.), CLARIN in the Low Countries. London: Ubiquity Press, 281-297.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Peirsman, Y. & D.Geeraerts (2006). Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics17(3), 269-316.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Rapp, A. M., D.T.Leube, M.Erb, W.Grodd & T.T.Kircher (2004). Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research20(3), 395-402.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: A.Ortony (red.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284-324.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In: E.Rosch & B.Lloyd (red.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. WNT = Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal (1882-1998), ‘s-Gravenhage/Leiden.
29. Wouden, T. van der (2020). All good and well. Introducing an objection in Dutch. In: E.Tribushinina & M.Dingemanse (red.), Linguistics in the Netherlands37, 135-148.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Zwarts, F. (1995). Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis25(3-4), 286-312.
    [Google Scholar]