Weerspiegelt taal cultuur? | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 137, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0040-7550
  • E-ISSN: 2212-0521
Preview this article:

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/TNTL2021.1.003.VELD
2021-01-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/00407550/137/1/TNTL2021.1.003.VELD.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/TNTL2021.1.003.VELD&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bendadi 2020 – S.Bendadi, ‘Grof taalgebruik in de politiek: “Taal is nooit vrijblijvend”’. In: MO13(oktober2020); https://www.mo.be/analyse/je-bek-houden-je-kot-blijven-krapuul-uitschot-tuig-taal-nooit-vrijblijvend-nooit.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bentz & Winter 2013 – C.Bentz & B.Winter, ‘Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case’. In: Language Dynamics and Change3(2013), p. 1–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bomans 2019 – G.Bomans, De brandmeester. Amsterdam: Van Oorschot, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boroditsky 2011 – LBoroditsky, ‘How language shapes thought’. In: Scientific American304(2011)2, p. 62–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deutscher 2010 – G.Deutscher, Through the language glass. Why the world looks different in other languages. London: Heinemann, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Elffers-van Ketel 1996 – E.Elffers-van Ketel, ‘The history of thought about language and thought’. In: C.Cremers & M.den Dikken (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1996, p. 73–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Everett 2013 – C.Everett, Linguistic relativity. Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Flaubert 1913 – G.Flaubert, Dictionnaire des idées reçues. Catalogue des opinions chics. Paris: Éditions Conard, 1913.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Franco 2017 – K.Franco, Concept features and lexical diversity. A dialectological casestudy on the relationship between meaning and variation. Doctoraal proefschrift, KU Leuven & Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Grondelaers e.a. 2020 – S.Grondelaers, R.De Troij, D.Speelman & A.van den Bosch, ‘Vissen naar variatie. Digitaal op zoek naar onbekende Noord/Zuid-verschillen in de grammatica van het Nederlands’. In: Nederlandse Taalkunde25(2020), p. 73–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Henrich 2020 – J.Henrich, The WEIRDest people in the world: how the west became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. New York: Farrar Strauss & Giroux, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Jespersen 1922 – O.Jespersen. Language. Its nature, development and origin. Book 1: History of linguistic science. London: Allen & Unwin, 1922.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kusters 2003 – W.Kusters, Linguistic complexity: the influence of social change on verbal inflection. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lateur 2018 – P.Lateur, ‘De Tael is gansch het Volk’; https://patricklateur.be/2018/10/08/de-tael-is-gansch-het-volk/.
  15. Lupyan & Dale 2010 – G.Lupyan & R.Dale, ‘Language structure is partly determined by social structure’. In PLoS ONE5(2010)1, e8559.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Nichols 2013 – J.Nichols, ‘The vertical archipelago: adding the third dimension to linguistic geography’. In: P.Auer, M.Hilpert, A.Stukenbrock & B.Szmrecsanyi (eds.), Space in language and linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2013, p. 38–60.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Parkvall 2006 – M.Parkvall, Limits of language. London: Battlebridge, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Peltola 1960 – N.Peltola, ‘On appositional constructions in Old English prose’. In: Neuphilologische Mitteilungen61(1960), p. 159–203.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pinker 2011 – S.Pinker, The better angels of our nature: why violence has declined. New York: Viking Books, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Plevoets 2008 – K.Plevoets, Tussen spreek- en standaardtaal: een corpusgebaseerd onderzoek naar de situationele, regionale en sociale verspreiding van enkele morfo-syntactische verschijnselen uit het gesproken Belgisch-Nederlands. Doctoraal proefschrift, KU Leuven, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rondia 2007 – K.Rondia, ‘Flamands et Wallons. Pensent-ils différemment?’ In: Équilibre (février2007), p. 36–37.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Sharifian 2015 – F.Sharifian, The Routledge handbook of language and culture. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sinnemäki & Di Garbo 2018 – K.Sinnemäki & F.Di Garbo, ‘Language structures may adapt to the sociolinguistic environment, but it matters what and how you count: a typological study of verbal and nominal complexity’. In: Frontiers in Psychology1141(2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Trudgill 2011 – P.Trudgill, Sociolinguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van der Horst 2013 – J.van der Horst, Taal op drift. Lange-termijnontwikkelingen in taal en samenleving. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Van de Velde 2009 – F.Van de Velde, Denominale constituent. Structuur en geschiedenis. Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Van de Velde e.a. 2020 – F.Van de Velde, J.Piersoul & I.De Smet, ‘De wervelkolom van taalverandering’. In: Nederlandse Taalkunde25(2020)2-3, p. 371–385.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Van het Reve 2008-2011 – K.van het Reve, Verzameld werk. Amsterdam: Van Oorschot, 2008-2011.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/TNTL2021.1.003.VELD
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error