Kwaliteit van arbeid en duurzame inzetbaarheid van platformwerkers

References

1. Appjobs (2020). Coronavirus effect on gig economy. Geraadpleegd op 20mei2022, van https://www.appjobs.com/blog/coronavirus-eect-on-gig-economy
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A.I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD-R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 389-411.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: towards decent work in the online world. International Labour Organization.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cazes, S., Hijzen, A., & Saint-Martin, A. (2016). Measuring and assessing job quality: The OECD Job Quality Framework. OECD.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (2017). To gig or not to gig? Stories from the modern economy.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Das, D., De Jong, R., Kool, L., & Gerritsen, J. (2020). Werken op waarde geschat – Grenzen aan digitale monitoring op de werkvloer door middel van data, algoritmen en AI. Rathenau Instituut.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Groen, W. P., Kilhoffer, Z., Lenaerts, K., & Mandl, I. (2018). Employment and working conditions of selected types of platform work. Publications Office of the European Union.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Degryse, C. (2016). Digitalisation of the economy and its impact on labour markets. Working paper. European Trade Union Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fernández-Macías, E. (2018). Automation, digitalisation and platforms: Implications for work and employment. Publications Office of the European Union.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Griesbach, K., Reich, A., Elliott-Negri, L., & Milkman, R. (2019). Algorithmic control in platform food delivery work. Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hoang, L., Blank, G., & Quan-Haase, A. (2020). The winners and the losers of the platform economy: Who participates?. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 681-700.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Joyce, S., Stuart, M., Forde, C., & Valizade, D. (2019). Work and social protection in the platform economy in Europe. In D.Lewin & P. J.Gollan (Reds.), Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, vol. 25 (pp. 153-184). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Li, Z., Hong, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). The empowering and competition effects of the platform-based sharing economy on the supply and demand sides of the labor market. Journal of Management Information Systems, 38(1), 140-165.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Liu, S., & Wang, M. (2012). Perceived overqualification: A review and recommendations for research and practice. Research in Occupational Stress and Well-being, 10, 1-42.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Karasek, R., Brisson, C., Kawakami, N., Houtman, I., Bongers, P., & Amick, B. (1998). The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 3(4), 322-355.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
17. McDonald, P., Williams, P., Stewart, A., Damian, O., & Robyn, M. (2019). Digital platform work in Australia: Preliminary findings from a national survey. Victorian Department of Premier and Cabinet.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Newlands, G. (2022). ‘This isn’t forever for me’: Perceived employability and migrant gig work in Norway and Sweden. EPA: Economy and Space, 1-18.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Newlands, G., Lutz, C., & Fieseler, C. (2018). European Perspectives on Power in the Sharing Economy. Norwegian Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Nordic Innovation (2019). The knowledge-intensive platform economy in the Nordic countries. Nordic Innovation.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2018). Good jobs for all in a changing world of work: The OECD Jobs Strategy.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Pesole, A., Urzi Brancati, C., Fernandez-Macias, E., Biagi, F., & Gonzalez Vazquez, I. (2018). Platform workers in Europe: Evidence from the colleem survey. Joint Research Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1), 124-170.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Piasna, A., Zwysen, W., & Drahokoupil, J. (2022). The Platform Economy in Europe: Results from the Second ETUI Internet and Platform Work Survey (IPWS). Working paper. European Trade Union Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10(27), 3758-3784.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rözer, J., Van der Torre, A., & Roeters, A. (2021). Platformisering en de kwaliteit van werk: Een kennissynthese. SCP.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. (2003). Utrechtse Bevlogenheid Schaal (UBES): Voorlopige handleiding. Universiteit Utrecht.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Schaufeli, W. B., & Van Dierendonck, D. (2000). Utrechtse Burnout Schaal (UBOS): Handleiding. Swets & Zeitlinger.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Schmidt, F. A. (2017). Digital labour markets in the platform economy: Mapping the political challenges of crowd work and gig work. Friedrich Ebert Stifung.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Serfling, O. (2018). Crowdworking monitor nr. 1. Hochschule RheinWaal.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Serfling, O. (2019). Crowdworking monitor nr. 2. Hochschule RheinWaal.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sociaal-Economische Raad (2009). Een kwestie van gezond verstand: Breed preventiebeleid binnen arbeidsorganisaties. Den Haag: SER.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ter Weel, B., Van der Werff, S., Bennaars, H., Scholte, R., Fijnje, J., Westerveld, M., & Mertens, T. (2018). De opkomst en groei van de kluseconomie in Nederland. SEO Economisch Onderzoek.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Toth, I., Heinänen, S., & Puumalainen, K. (2021). Passionate and engaged? Passion for inventing and work engagement in different knowledge work contexts. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research27(9), 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Van der Torre, W., Dirven, H. J., & Van de Ven, H. (2018). Zzp’ers en werknemers: Ongelijkheid in kwaliteit van werk. Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, 34(2), 156-169.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Van der Torre, W., Lautenbach, H., Van de Ven, H. A., Janssen, B. J. M., De Vroome, E. M. M., Janssen, B., Ramaekers, M. M. M. J., & Hooftman, W. E. (2021). Zelfstandigen Enquête Arbeid 2021: Methodologie en globale resultaten. CBS/TNO.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Van Vuuren, T., Caniëls, M. C. J., & Semeijn, J. H. (2011). Duurzame inzetbaarheid en een leven lang leren. Gedrag & Organisatie, 24(4), 357-374.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Verbiest, S., & Smulders, P. G. W. (2018). Een eerste verkenning van platform-zzp’ers: beschrijvende statistiek. ESB Economisch Statistische Berichten, 103(103), 38-41.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Verbiest, S., Van de Ven, H. A., & Van den Bergh, R. E. C. (2020). Platformarbeid in kaart brengen: een verkennend onderzoek uitgevoerd binnen het Kennisinvesteringsprogramma Future of Work 2019-2020. TNO.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Verbiest, S., Van den Tooren, M., Van der Torre, W., & Van de Ven, H. A. (2019). De kwaliteit van arbeid van platformwerkers: een eerste verkenning. Een onderzoek uitgevoerd binnen het Kennisinvesteringsprogramma Future of Work 2018. TNO.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Woodcock, J., & Graham, M. (2020). The gig economy: a critical introduction. Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]