oa De discursieve constructie van emotionele problemen in het follow-up consult van hoofd-hals-kankerpatiënten

References

1. Arora, N.K.(2003). Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 791-806.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Beach, W.A.(2013). Patients' efforts to justify wellness in a comprehensive cancer clinic. Health Communication, 28(6), 577-592.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Beach, W. A. & Dozier, D. M.(2015). Fears, uncertainties, and hopes: Patient-initiated actions and doctors’ responses during oncology interviews. Journal of Health Communication, 20(11), 1243-1254.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Beach, W. A., Easter, D. W., Good, J. S. & Pigeron, E.(2005). Disclosing and responding to cancer “fears” during oncology interviews. Social Science & Medicine, 60(4), 893-910.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biddle, L., Paramasivan, S., Harris, S., Campbell, R., Brennan, J. & Hollingworth, W.(2016). Patients’ and clinicians’ experiences of holistic needs assessment using a cancer distress thermometer and problem list: A qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 23, 59–65.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Boyd, E. & Heritage. J.(2006). Taking the history: questioning during comprehensive history taking. In J.Heritage & D.W.Maynard (Red.) Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 150-184). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987/2009). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. In N.Coupland & A.Jaworski (Red.), Sociolinguistics: Critical Concepts. (Vol. 3, pp. 311-323). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Buchhold, B., Wiesmann, U., Bahlmann, J., Lutze, S., Eggert, C., Arnold, A., et al. (2016). Psychosocial burden and desire for support in outpatients with skin cancer. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft, 14(4), 405-414.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cameron, R. A., Mazer, B. L., DeLuca, J. M., Mohile, S. G. & Epstein, R. M.(2015). In search of compassion: a new taxonomy of compassionate physician behaviours. Health Expectations, 18(5), 1672-1685.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clift, R.(2016). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clover, K. A., Mitchell, A. J., Britton, B., & Carter, G.(2015). Why do oncology outpatients who report emotional distress decline help?Psycho‐Oncology, 24(7), 812-818.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Easter, D.W. & Beach, W.(2004). Competent patient care is dependent upon attending to empathic opportunities presented during interview sessions. Current Surgery, 61(3), 313-318.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Epstein, R.M. & Street Jr., R.L.(2007). Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Finset, A., Heyn, L. & Ruland, C.(2013). Patterns in clinicians’ responses to patient emotion in cancer care. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 80-85.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ford, S., Fallowfield, L. & Lewis, S.(1996). Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Social Science & Medicine, 42 (11), 1511-1519.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Ghazali, N., Cadwallader, E., Lowe, D., Humphris, G., Ozakinci, G. & Rogers, S.N.(2013). Fear of recurrence among head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal trends. Psycho-Oncology22, 807–813
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gill, V. T.(1998). Doing attributions in medical interaction: Patients' explanations for illness and doctors' responses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 342-360.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gill, V. T. & Maynard, D. W.(2006). Explaining illness: patients' proposals and physicians' responses. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, 20, 115-150.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goffman, E.(1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1/2), 1-29.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heritage, J. & Robinson, J.D.(2006). Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care. In J.Heritage & D.W.Maynard (Red.) Communication in Medical care: Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients (pp. 48-85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Heritage, J.(2010). Questioning in Medicine. In A.F.Freed & S.Ehrlich (Red.) “Why do you Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse (pp. 42-68). Oxford: OUP.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Heritage, J.(2013)Epistemics in Conversation. In J.Sidnell & T.Strivers (Red.) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 370-394). Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hymes, D.(1964). Directions in (ethno-)linguistic theory. American Anthropologist, 66(3-2), 6-56.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland(2010). Detecteren Behoefte Psychosociale Zorg. Landelijke Richtlijn, Versie: 1.0. Geraadpleegd 31 augustus 2015, www.oncoline.nl/detecteren-behoefte-psychosociale-zorg.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jefferson, G.(1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J.Schenken (Red.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jefferson, G.(1980). On ‘trouble-premonitory’ response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry50, 153-185.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jefferson, G.(1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418-441.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kirsner, R.S. & Deen, J.(1990). Het mes snijdt aan twee kanten: On the semantics and pragmatics of the Dutch sentence-final particle hoor. In M.Bruijn Lacy (Red.) The Low Countries: Multidisciplinary Studies (pp. 1-12). Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Labov, W.(2010). Oral narratives of personal experience. In Hogan, P.C. (Red.) Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences (pp. 546–548). Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Maguire, P.(2002). Improving the recognition of concerns and affective disorders in cancer patients. Annals of Oncology, 13(suppl-4), 177-181.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mazeland, H.(2016). The positionally sensitive workings of the Dutch particle NOU. In Auer, P. & Maschler, Y. (Red.) “Nu” and “Nå”: A Family of Discourse Markers Across the Language of Europe and Beyond (pp. 377-408). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mitchell, K. S., Delfont, S., Bracey, M. L. & Endacott, R.(2018). Top ten concerns burdening people with cancer: perceptions of patients with cancer and the nurses caring for them. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 33, 102-106.
    [Google Scholar]
33. NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network)(1999). NCCN practice guidelines for the management of psychosocial distress. Oncology (Huntingt), 13(5A), 113–147.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pander Maat, H., Driessen, C. & Mierlo, H. V.(1986). Nou: functie, contexten, vorm en betekenis. Corpus-analyse en experiment. GAGL: Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, (27), 144-172.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Parsons, T.(1975). The sick role and the role of the physician reconsidered. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, Health and Society, 53(3), 275-78.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pomerantz, A.(1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes. In Atkinson, J.J. & Heritage, J. (Red.) Structures of Social Action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Pomerantz, A.(1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies9, 219-229.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Pomerantz, A., Gill, V. T. & Denvir, P.(2007). When patients present serious health conditions as unlikely: Managing potentially conflicting issues and constraints. In A.Hepburn & S.Wiggins (Red.) Discursive research in practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction (pp. 127-146). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Raymond, G.(2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 939-967.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Redeker, G.(2006). Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In K.Fischer (Red.) Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 427-447). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sacks, H.(1975). Everyone has to lie. In M.Sanches & B.G.Blount (Red.) Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use (pp. 57-80). New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Schegloff, E.A.(1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D.Tannen (Red.) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1981 (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Schegloff, E. A.(2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schegloff, E.A. & Sacks, H.(1982). Opening up closings. (Expanded version). In J.Baugh & J.Sherzer (Red.) Language in Use (pp. 69-99). New York: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Sevigny, M.J.(1981). Triangulated inquiry: A methodology for the analysis of classroom interaction. In: J.L.Green & C.Wallat (Red.). Ethnography and Language in Educational Setting (pp. 65-85). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tuinman, M.A, Gazendam-Donofrio, S.M. & Hoekstra-Weebers, J.E.(2008). Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: Use of the Distress Thermometer. Cancer, 113, 870-878.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Umbach, C.(2004). On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics, 21(2), 155–175.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Van Bergen, G., & Bosker, H. R.(2018). Linguistic expectation management in online discourse processing: An investigation of Dutch inderdaad 'indeed' and eigenlijk 'actually'. Journal of Memory and Language, 103, 191-209.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Van der Laaken, M., & Bannink, A.(2020). Openings in follow-up cancer consultations: The ‘How are you?’ question revisited. Discourse Studies, 22(2), 205-220.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Van der Laaken, M., Bannink, A., & Van den Brekel, M.(2020). Topicalizing psychosocial distress in cancer follow-up consultations: An exploration of the interactional effects of discussion tools. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1812866.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Van der Laaken & Bannink (under review). Discussing psychosocial distress in follow-up cancer consultations, with and without the Distress Thermometer and Problem List.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Van der Laaken & Bannink (in voorbereiding). The key of the follow-up cancer consultation.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Van der Linden, M, Hoekstra-Weebers, J., De Graeff, A. & Mathot, F.(Red.) (2016). Psychosociale Zorg in de Oncologie. Een Praktijkboek voor Dokters. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Weiste, E. & Peräkylä, A.(2015). Therapeutic Discourse. In K.Tracy, C. Ilie & T.Sandel (Red.) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction (pp. 1-10). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Zhou, Y., Humphris, G., Ghazali, N., Friderichs, S., Grosset, D. & Rogers, S. N.(2015). How head and neck consultants manage patients’ emotional distress during cancer follow-up consultations: A multilevel study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 272(9), 2473-2481.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Zimmermann, C., Del Piccolo, L. & Finset, A.(2007). Cues and concerns by patients in medical consultations: a literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 438-463.
    [Google Scholar]