oa Valuating the invisible

References

1. Amsing, E., P.Wagenaar, J.Rodenberg and H.Renes. 2023. “Crafting castella: why interactive governance led to success in reconstructing a castellum in Utrecht, but not in Leiden”. In Calling on the community. Understanding participation in the heritage sector: an interactive governance perspective, edited by J.Rodenberg, P.Wagenaar and G.-J.Burgers, 93-115. London and New York: Berghahn.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ander, E., L.Thomson, G.Noble, A.Lanceley, U.Menon and H.Chatterjee. 2013. “Heritage, health and well-being: assessing the impact of a heritage focused intervention on health and well-being.”International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(3): 229-242.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Australia ICOMOS. 2013. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Avrami, E., S.Macdonald, R.Mason, and D.Myers, eds. 2019. Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Becker, T.2008. “Nature and function of reconstructions on the upper German-Raetian Limes using the example of wooden watch-towers”. In Frontiers of the Roman Empire. The European Dimension of a World heritage Site, edited by D.J.Breeze and S.Jilek, 153-162. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Berliner, D.2018. “Can Anything Become Heritage?”. In Sense and Essence: Heritage and the Cultural Production of the Real, edited by B.Meyer and M.van de Port, 299-305. London and New York: Berghahn.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blessi, G.T., E.Grossi, P. L.Sacco, G.Pieretti and G.Ferilli. 2014. “Cultural Participation, Relational Goods and Individual Subjective Well-Being: Some Empirical Evidence.”Review of Economics & Finance, 4: 33-46.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Boom, K.2018. “Imprint of action : the sociocultural impact of public activities in archaeology.” PhD Diss. Leiden University.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Boom, K., M.H.van den Dries, A.Gramsch and A.van Rhijn. 2019. “A tale of the unexpected: a heritage encounter with a new target audience and the sociocultural effects experienced by this community of participants.”In Transforming Heritage Practice in the 21st century, Contributions from Community Archaeology. One World Archaeologies-series, edited by J. H.Jameson and S.Musteata, 29-43. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Breeze, D.J.2008. “Presenting Roman military sites to the public. In Frontiers of the Roman Empire. The European Dimension of a World heritage Site, edited by D.J.Breeze and S.Jilek, 141-148. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Candau, J. and M.L. MazzucchiFerreira. 2015. “Memory and cultural heritage: narratives and patrimonial affordances.”Educar em Revista58: 21-36.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chatterjee, H., S.Vreeland and G.Noble. 2009. “Museopathy: Exploring the Healing Potential of Handling Museum Objects.”Museum and Society7(3): 164-177.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chorus, J.2020. ‘De forten langs de Rijn in Romeins Nederland’ [The Fortresses along the Rhine in the Roman Netherlands], Lampas53(2): 157-73.
    [Google Scholar]
14. CHCfE Consortium. 2015. Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe. Krakow: International Cultural Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dinter, M. van. 2017. “Living along the Limes: Landscape and Settlement in the Lower Rhine Delta during Roman and Early Medieval Times”. Ph.D. diss. Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dolff-Bonekämper, G.2008. “Sites of Memory and Sites of Discord. Historic Monuments as a Medium for Discussing Conflict in Europe”. In The Heritage Reader, edited by G.Fairclough, R.Harrison, J.H.Jameson and J.Schofield, 134-138. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dries, M. H. van den. 2021. “The public benefits of archaeology according to the public.”Internet Archaeology57.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dries, M.H. van den, K.H.J.Boom and S.J.van der Linde. 2015. “Exploring archaeology’s social values for present day society”, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia45: 221-234.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Duval, M., B.Smith, S.Hœrlé, L.Bovet, N.Khumalo, and L.Bhengu. 2019. “Towards a holistic approach to heritage values: a multidisciplinary and cosmopolitan approach.”International Journal of Heritage Studies25(12): 1279-1301.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fredheim, L.H. and M.Khalaf. 2016. “The significance of values: heritage value typologies re-examined.”International Journal of Heritage Studies22(6): 466-48.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fujiwara, D., T.Cornwall and P.Dolan. 2014. Heritage and Wellbeing. Swindon: English Heritage.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gibson, J. J.2015. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. New York and Londen: Psychology press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ginkel, E., van, and W.Vos. 2018. Grens van het Romeinse Rijk: de limes in Zuid-Holland [Border of the Roman Empire: The Limes in Zuid-Holland]. Utrecht: Matrijs.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Ginzarly, M., and J.Teller. 2020. “Online communities and their contribution to local heritage knowledge.”Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development11(4): 361-380.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Graafstal, E. and T.Hazenberg, T.2020. “De nieuwe kleren van de keizer’? De lange weg naar een aantrekkelijk werelderfgoed” [The emperor’s new clothes’? The long way to an attractive world heritage], Lampas53(2): 282-293.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Graafstal, E.2021, “Castellum Hoge Woerd (Utrecht-NL): a revived Roman fort located in a local community”. In Visitor experiences and audiences for the Roman frontiers, edited by N.Mills, 55-66. Oxford: BAR Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Halbertsma, M. and M.Kuipers. 2014. Het erfgoeduniversum. Een inleiding in de theorie en praktijk van cultureel erfgoed. [The Heritage Universe. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Cultural Heritage]. Bussum: Coutinho.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Harrison, R.2013. Heritage: Critical Approaches. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Hazenberg, T. and C.Visser. 2021. “Concrete for the Limes: developing the Interpretation Framework for the Dutch section of the Lower German Limes”. In Visitor experiences and audiences for the Roman frontiers, edited by N.Mills, 23-40. Oxford: BAR Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Heinich, N.2000. “From rejection of contemporary art to culture war.” In Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, edited by M.Lamont and L.Thévenot, 170–209. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Heinich, N.2009. La fabrique du patrimoine: De la cathédrale à la petite cuillère [The heritage factory: From the cathedral to the teaspoon]. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. URL: https://books.openedition.org/editionsmsh/2642
    [Google Scholar]
32. Heinich, N.2011. “The making of cultural heritage.”The Nordic Journal of Aesthetics22(40-41): 119-128.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Heinich, N.2017. Des valeurs. Une approche sociologique. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Heinich, N.2020a. “A Pragmatic Redefinition of Value (s): Toward a General Model of Valuation.”Theory, Culture & Society37(5): 75-94.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Heinich, N.2020b. “Ten Proposals on Values [On Values: A sociological approach].’Cultural Sociology14(3): 213-232.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Heinich, N.2021. “Emotions and Valuations: Notre-Dame de Paris on Fire as a Case Study for Axiological Sociology.”Valuation Studies8(1): 67-83. URL: https://valuationstudies.liu.se/
    [Google Scholar]
37. Höchtl, F., M.Ebrahimzadeh and P.Pauli. 2008. “Quot capita, tot sensus: participative landscape and heritage conservation along the upper German-Raetian Limes”. In Frontiers of the Roman Empire. The European Dimension of a World heritage Site, edited by D.J.Breeze and S.Jilek, 167-174. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Australia ICOMOS. 2013. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Johnston, C.2017. “Recognising connection: social significance and heritage practice.”Córima, Revista de Investigación en Gestión Cultural2(2): 1-24.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jones, S., and S.Leech. 2015. Valuing the Historic Environment: A Critical Review of Existing Approaches to Social Value. London: AHRC.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Klamer, A.2009. “Hoe de economische waarde van cultureel-historisch erfgoed te realiseren en tegelijkertijd zijn culturele waarde te bewaken” [How to realize the economic value of heritage and at the same time safeguard its cultural value]. In Het cultuurhistorisch argument: essaybundel [The cultural historical argument: essays], edited by M.Linssen, 21-26. Utrecht: Projectbureau Belvedere.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lamont, M.2012. “Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation.”Annual Review of Sociology38(1): 201-221.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lems, E., and H.van Gelder. 1995. “Op zoek naar Matilo: sporen van de Romeinen in Leiden” [Looking for Matilo: Traces of the Romans in Leiden]. Leiden: Gemeente Leiden, Dienst Bouwen en Wonen.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Linssen, M.2009. “Kracht van argumentatie” [Power of argumentation]. In Het cultuurhistorisch argument: essaybundel [The cultural historical argument: essays], edited by M.Linssen, 9-16. Utrecht: Projectbureau Belvedere.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Maeer G., A.Robinson, M. Hobson. 2016. Values and benefits of heritage: A research review. Heritage lottery fund. Available online at: https://www.hlf.org.uk/values-and-benefits-heritage
    [Google Scholar]
46. Mason, R.2002. “Assessing Values in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices.” In Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage, edited by M.de la Torre, 5-30. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mills, N.2021. “Interpretation frameworks: principles and practice”. In Visitor experiences and audiences for the Roman frontiers, edited by N.Mills, 5-22. Oxford: BAR Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Moser, S., D.Glazier, J. E.Phillips, L.Nasser el Nemr, M. S.Mousa, R. N.Aiesh, S.Richardson, A.Conner and M.Seymour. 2002. “Transforming Archaeology through Practice: Strategies for Collaborative Archaeology and the Community Archaeology Project at Quseir, Egypt.”World Archaeology34(2): 220-48.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Orthel, D.2022. “Linking public health and heritage work.”International Journal of Heritage Studies, 28(1): 44-58.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Pierik, H.J.2017. ‘Past Human-Landscape Interactions in the Netherlands: Reconstructions from Sand Belt to Coastal Delta Plain for the First Millennium AD.” Ph.D. diss. Utrecht University.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Riegl, A. [1902] 1982. The modern cult of monuments: Its character and its origins. Reprint, trans. D.Ghirardo and K.Forster. Oppositions25: 21-51.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Scott, C.2006. “Museums: Impact and value.”Cultural Trends, 15(1): 45-75
    [Google Scholar]
53. Smith. L.2006. Uses of heritage.London and New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
54. Thiel, A.2008. “The Challenge of Appropriate Presentation of Archaeological Monuments along the Upper German-Raetian Limes”. In Frontiers of the Roman Empire. The European Dimension of a World heritage Site, edited by D.J.Breeze and S.Jilek, 149-152. Edinburgh: Historic Scotland.
    [Google Scholar]
55. UNESCO. 2015. Policy for the Integration of a Sustainable Development Perspective into the Processes of the World Heritage Convention. WHC-15/20.GA/INF.13
    [Google Scholar]
56. UNESCO. 2021. The role of visitor centres in UNESCO Designated Sites: report of the third regional Workshop for Europe.Ercalano: Unesco Office Venice and Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
57. UNESCO. 2022. Interpretive planning at World Heritage properties in Europe: report on the Pilot WH-Interp training course in 2021. Ercalano: Unesco Office Venice and Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Wagenaar, P. and J.Rodenberg. 2023. “Interacting with Governance: A Public Administration Perspective on Interactive Governance for Heritage Studies.” In Calling on the Community: Understanding Participation in the Heritage Sector, an Interactive Governance Perspective edited by J.Rodenberg, P.Wagenaar and G.-J.Burgers, 28-52. London and New York: Berghahn.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Waterton, E., L.Smith and G.Campbell. 2006. “The Utility of Discourse Analysis to Heritage Studies: The Burra Charter and Social Inclusion”. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12 (4): 339-355.
    [Google Scholar]