2004
Volume 51, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0165-4322
  • E-ISSN: 3050-9947

Abstract

Abstract

The debate about room for religion in public space is often framed in terms of a contrast between the subjective and the objective. In this context, religion is seen as subjective; after all, beliefs are considered to be merely personal opinions. In contrast, the government is viewed as objective; it is expected to rely on facts rather than prejudices, as Van Dale defines the term ‘objective’. The belief that the government can create a neutral public space from an objective starting point carries significant risks. Such a government assumes it knows what is best for its citizens and enforces that view. This reduces the space available for minorities to hold differing views. It puts pressure on tolerance for divergent opinions and practices, and thus threatens a pluralistic society. A government that acknowledges its own subjective position creates space for a diversity of views to exist side by side. This fosters tolerance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/RADIX.2025.2.005.FRAA
2025-06-01
2025-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bijsterveld, S. van (2012). Burger tussen religie, staat en markt. Inaugurele rede uitgesproken op 2 december 2011. Tilburg: Tilburg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cavanaugh, W. (2003). Theopolitical Imagination. Christian Practices of Space and Time. Londen: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fraanje, R. (2025). Geloof in de politiek. Een onderzoek naar de omgang met godsdienst in het politieke debat in Nederland, Den Haag: Boom. [Proefschrift, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Groot, G. (2022). Liberalisme en zijn kop-van-jut, in: M.ten Hooven, Ware tolerantie. Hoe we onszelf kunnen zijn en elkaar toch kunnen verdragen (p. 111-124). Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kennedy, J.C. en Rutjes, M. (2022). Gescheiden partners. Een geschiedenis van overheid en religieuze organisaties in Nederland. Amsterdam: Prometheus.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mansvelt Beck, F. (2015). How we do things here. Moral Communities, Integration, and Toleration in the Netherlands: Competing Interpretations of Liberalism in Parliamentary Practice 2000-2013, Leiden. [Proefschrift, Universiteit Leiden]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Mansvelt Beck, F. (2016). Franse toestanden? Veranderende visies op religieuze vrijheid in Nederland en Europa, in: Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, 2015 (7)3, 6-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Napel, H. M. ten (2017). Constitutionalism, Democracy and Religious Freedom. To Be Fully Human. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nickolson, Lars (2024). From Liberty to Equality. Religious freedom in normative theory and Dutch politics, Amsterdam. [Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor, C. (2010). Een seculiere tijd (vert.). Rotterdam: Lemniscaat.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wallet, B. (2011, 14mei). In het land van dierenvrienden. Trouw. Geraadpleegd op 9mei2025, van <trouw.nl/nieuws/in-het-land-van-dierenvrienden~bddfea0e/>
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wallet, Bart (2012). ‘Ritueel slachten en godsdienstvrijheid in een seculiere samenleving’, in: Religie & Samenleving, 20122(7), 166-183.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Williams, R. (2013). Geloof in de publieke ruimte (vert.). Vught: Skandalon. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/RADIX.2025.2.005.FRAA
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/RADIX.2025.2.005.FRAA
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error