
Full text loading...
Recent controversies surrounding the burning of religious scriptures in the Netherlands and other European countries have reignited debates on the limits of free speech. However, Dutch law does not prohibit such acts. This article analyses whether the Netherlands should criminalise these acts. It does so by outlining the legal and philosophical framework for the right to freedom of speech in relation to blasphemy and group defamation laws. In this analysis, two competing perspectives emerge: a Voltairean perspective that stands for a wide range of expressions to be protected under the freedom of expression, and a multiculturalist perspective, that narrows the range of free speech to protect religious communities from offense and social unrest. After these perspectives are elaborated on, this article outlines the tension between viewing the desecration of religious scriptures as a form of symbolic speech versus a form of symbolic silencing. By analysing this tension and assessing its implications, this study seeks to formulate a normative perspective on the criminalisation of the desecration of religious scriptures, and thereby contributes to the ongoing discussion on balancing free speech and religious tolerance in pluralistic societies.