An Occupation Without a Future. Peddlers of Jewish Amsterdam, 1873-1943 | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 49, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1781-7838
  • E-ISSN: 1783-1792

Abstract

Abstract

This article examines the final seventy years of street trade in Jewish Amsterdam, from 1880 to the 1930s. It highlights the long-standing struggle of Amsterdam city officials to get a grip on an elusive phenomenon that was inextricably linked to public life for centuries, but increasingly clashed with the demands of modernity: ever since the Jewish street riots against the removal of peddlers in 1880, the social and administrative problems related to peddling kept reappearing on the political agenda. This was partly due to the elusiveness of the profession as well as political choices. It was only in the mid-1930s that the peddler’s question was, at least administratively, resolved by Salomon de Miranda, a socialist alderman and a Jew. In his struggle to elevate all proletarians, he made no distinction between the disadvantaged Jewish population and others. De Miranda had hoped the problematic peddling business would gradually ‘die out’ because of official regulation. During the German occupation a few years later, business in Jewish Amsterdam indeed came to an end, abruptly and definitively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/SR2023.2.003.SPA
2023-12-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/17817838/49/2/SR2023.2.003.SPA.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/SR2023.2.003.SPA&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aerts, Remieg. “‘De eischen des tijds‘. De heroriëntatie van economie en politiek.” In: Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, Hoofdstad in aanbouw 1813-1900, edited by RemiegAerts and Pietde Rooy, 293-325. Amsterdam:SUN, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aerts, Remieg and Pietde Rooy. “Het verval, de verkrotting en het verleden.” In: Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, Hoofdstad in aanbouw 1813-1900, edited by RemiegAerts and Pietde Rooy, 17-58. Amsterdam:SUN, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Assmann, Aleida. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg, Hetty, TheraWijsenbeek, and EricFischer, eds. Venter, Fabriqueur, Fabrikant. Joodse ondernemers en ondernemingen in Nederland, 1796-1940. Amsterdam: NEHA, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Blom, J.C.H. (Hans) and Joël J.Cahen. “Joodse Nederlanders, Nederlandse joden en joden in Nederland (1870-1940).” In Geschiedenis van de joden in Nederland, edited by HansBlom, DavidWertheim, HettyBerg, and BartWallet, 275-359. Amsterdam: Balans, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Commissie ter bestudering van het ventersvraagstuk. “Rapport Inzake Het Ventersvraagstuk: Uitgebracht Door De Commissie Ter Bestudering Van Het Ventersvraagstuk Aan Burgemeester En Wethouders Van Amsterdam.”Amsterdam, 1930.
  7. Couperus, Stefan. De machinerie van de stad. Stadsbestuur als idee en praktijk, Nederland en Amsterdam 1900-1940. Amsterdam: Aksant, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dillen, Johannes G. van. “De economische positie en betekenis der Joden in de Republiek en in de Nederlandse koloniale wereld.” In Geschiedenis der Joden in Nederland, edited by H.Brugmans and A.Frank, 561-616. Amsterdam: Van Holkema & Warendorf, 1940.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Eijk, Piet van der. Vodduh! Venters en hun straatroep. ’s-Gravenhage: BZZZTôH, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ewen, Shane. What is Urban History?Polity Press: Cambridge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gans, Mozes Heiman. Memorboek. Platenatlas van het leven der joden in Nederland van de middeleeuwen tot 1940. Baarn: Bosch & Keunig, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hond, Meijer de. Kiekjes. Jodenbreestraat-Waterlooplein.Amsterdam: Menno Hertzberger, 1926.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huberts, Veronica R.A.D.“De Amsterdamse venters. Een sociografische monografie.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam, 1940.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jacobs, Annelies E.G.“Het geluid van gisteren: waarom Amsterdam vroeger ook niet stil was.” PhD diss., Maastricht University, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jager, Ida. Hoofdstad in gebreke. Manoeuvreren met publieke werken in Amsterdam 1851-1901. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kistemaker, Renée. “De Amsterdamse markten van omstreeks 1300 tot 1815. De ontwikkeling van een handelsstad Amsterdam van 1220 tot 1795.” In Amsterdam Marktstad, edited by RenéeKistemaker, MichielWagenaar, and Josvan Assendelft, 14-95. Amsterdam: Dienst voor het Marktwezen, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kostof, Spiro. “His Majesty the Pick: The Aesthetics of Demolition.” In Streets. Critical Perspectives on Public Space, edited by ZeynepÇelik, DianeFavro, and RichardIngersoll, 9-22. London: University of California Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lesger, C.Shopping Spaces and the Urban Landscape in Early Modern Amsterdam, 1550-1850. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Leydesdorff, Selma. Wij hebben als mens geleefd. Het Joodse proletariaat van Amsterdam 1900-1940. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff, 1987.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Roest, Friso and JosScheren. Oorlog in de stad. Amsterdam 1939-1941. Amsterdam: Van Gennep, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Romijn, Peter. “De oorlog (1940-1945).” In Geschiedenis van de joden in Nederland, edited by HansBlom, DavidWertheim, HettyBerg, and BartWallet, 360-406. Amsterdam: Balans, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rooy, Piet de. “Een woelige wereldstad 1883-1893.” In Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, Hoofdstad in aanbouw 1813-1900, edited by RemiegAerts and Pietde Rooy, 433-518. Amsterdam:SUN, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rooy, Piet de. “Het middelpunt van het vaderland 1901-1914.” In Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, Tweestrijd om de hoofdstad 1900-2000, edited by Pietde Rooy, 17-72. Amsterdam:SUN, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rooy, Piet de. “Oorlog en revolutie, 1914-1925.” In Geschiedenis van Amsterdam, Tweestrijd om de hoofdstad 1900-2000, edited by Pietde Rooy, 73-126. Amsterdam:SUN, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sagers, Frans. “Amsterdamsche straatroepen.”Tijdschrift der Vereeniging voor Noord-Nederlandsche Muziekgeschiedenis, vol. 10, 2 (1919): 87-132.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sluys, David M.“Hoogduits-Joods Amsterdam van 1635 tot 1795.” In Geschiedenis der Joden in Nederland, edited by H.Brugmans en A.Frank, 306-381. Amsterdam: Holkema & Warendorf, 1940.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Swetschinski, Daniel M.“Vestiging, verdraagzaamheid en vereniging tot 1639.” In Geschiedenis van de joden in Nederland, edited by HansBlom, DavidWertheim, HettyBerg, and BartWallet, 55-97. Amsterdam: Balans, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tammes, Peter. “‘Hack, Pack, Sack’: Occupational Structure, Status, and Mobility of Jews in Amsterdam, 1851-1941,”Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryXLIII: I (2012): 1-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Verlaan, Tim. “Digging in the crates: Archival research and historical primary sources.” In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on the Study of the Urban, edited by NankeVerloo and LucaBertolini, 85-95. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Waldinger, Roger D.“The Ethnic Enclave Debate Revisited.”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research17, no. 3 (September1993): 444-452.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zanten, J.H. van and N.M.Josephus Jitta. De voorziening der bevolking van Amsterdam met versche levensmiddelen. Rapport van de Commissie tot Onderzoek van den Toestand van het Marktwezen, ingesteld bij besluit van B. & W. van Amsterdam 15 Jan. 1913. Amsterdam, 1914.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/SR2023.2.003.SPA
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/SR2023.2.003.SPA
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error