oa The Spectacle of Security in the Case of Hungarian Far-Right Paramilitary Groups

References

1.  László Szocs, ‘A Tale of the Unexpected: The Extreme Right vis-à-vis Democracy in Postcommunist Hungary,’Ethnic and Racial Studies21, no. 6 (1998): 1096–1115.
   [Google Scholar]
2.  Béla Bodó, ‘Hungarian Aristocracy and the White Terror,’Journal of Contemporary History, 45, no. 4 (2010): 712–14.
   [Google Scholar]
3.  Béla Bodó, ‘Paramilitary Violence in Hungary after the First World War,’East European Quarterly38, no. 2 (June 2004): 129–72; Béla Bodó, ‘Militia Violence and State Power in Hungary, 1919–1922,’ Hungarian Studies Review 23, no. 1–2 (2006): 121–56.
   [Google Scholar]
4.  Béla Bodó, ‘Iván Héjjas: The Life of a Counterrevolutionary,’East Central Europe37 (2010): 247–79.
   [Google Scholar]
5.  Bodó, ‘Hungarian Aristocracy and the White Terror,’709.
   [Google Scholar]
6.  Béla Bodó, ‘The White Terror in Hungary, 1919–1921: The Social Worlds of Paramilitary Groups,’Austrian History Yearbook42 (2011): 146–47.
   [Google Scholar]
7.  Bodó, ‘Hungarian Aristocracy and the White Terror.’ Bodó offers extended explanations for the violence perpetrated by the militias. In brief, for him, this violence was a cross between a sort of sadism on behalf of the upper and middle classes directed against the poor (Bodó, ‘Paramilitary Violence in Hungary after the First World War,’141; 144), and the Durkheim-inspired turn of the century ‘anomie’ or ‘normlessness,’ which ‘[manifests] itself, among other things, in asocial behaviour and arbitrary violence against civilians.’ (Bodó, ‘Militia Violence and State Power in Hungary, 1919–1922,’ 125).
   [Google Scholar]
8.  Kürti, ‘The uncivility of a civil society,’48.
   [Google Scholar]
9.  Szocs, ‘A Tale of the Unexpected,’1097.
   [Google Scholar]
10.  Kürti, ‘The uncivility of a civil society,’43.
    [Google Scholar]
11.  Adam Le Bor, ‘Marching Back to the Future: Magyar Garda and the Resurgence of the Right in Hungary,’Dissent55, no. 2 (Spring 2008); Michael J. Jordan, ‘On Guard,’ Transitions Online, March 2008, accessed Januar 29, 2013, http://www.tol.org/client/article/19471-on-guard.html; Colin Woodard, ‘Hungary’s anti-Roma militia grows,’ Christian Science Monitor 100, no. 55 (2008).
    [Google Scholar]
12.  Karácsony and Róna, ‘Reasons behind the rise of the Hungarian radical right,’82.
    [Google Scholar]
13.  Ibid., 80; Rudas, ‘A Jobbik törzsszavazóiról,’515.
    [Google Scholar]
14.  Karácsony and Róna, ‘Reasons behind the rise of the Hungarian radical right,’71-2; Katalin Halasz, ‘The Rise of the Radical Right in Europe and the Case of Hungary: “Gypsy crime” defines national identity?’ Development 52, no. 4 (2009): 490–94.
    [Google Scholar]
15.  Feischmidt and Szombati, Gyöngyöspata 2011, 16.
    [Google Scholar]
16.  In the summer of2012, new violent incidents were sparked by patrols in Cegléd and in Devecser. ‘Neo-Nazis in Cegléd, Hungary,’ Hungarian Spectrum, accessed January 29, 2013, http://hungarianspectrum.wordpress.com/2012/08/20/neo-nazis-in-cegled-hungary/comment-page-1/. In October 2012, the Roma people organized a big counter-demonstration against the patrols in Miskolc, in what was probably the most important display of Roma resistance in the previous twenty years (author’s participant observation, October 2012).
17.  Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1996), 33.
    [Google Scholar]
18.  Hugh Gusterson, People of the bomb: portraits of America’s nuclear complex (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004), 166.
    [Google Scholar]
19.  Didier Bigo, ‘Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease,’Alternatives: Global, Local, Political27, no. 1 (2002): 63–92; Jef Huysmans, ‘A Foucaultian View on Spill-over: Freedom and Security in the EU,’ Journal of International Relations and Development 7, no. 3 (2004): 294–318.
    [Google Scholar]
20.  Feischmidt and Szombati, Gyöngyöspata 2011, 17.
    [Google Scholar]
21.  C.a.s.e. Collective, ‘Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto,’Security Dialogue37, no. 4 (2006): 443–87.
    [Google Scholar]
22.  Iver Neumann, ‘Identity and the Outbreak of War: Or Why the Copenhagen School of Security Studies Should Include the Idea of “Violisation” in Its Framework of Analysis,’International Journal of Peace Studies3, no. 1 (1998): 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
23.  David Apter, The Legitimization of Violence (London: Macmillan, 1997), 13.
    [Google Scholar]
24.  Apter, The Legitimization of Violence, 12.
    [Google Scholar]
25.  Mark Salter, ‘Securitization and Desecuritization: a Dramaturgical Analysis of the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority,’Journal of International Relations and Development11 (2008): 321–49.
    [Google Scholar]