2004
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Fascism
  4. Volume 2, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 2, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2211-6249
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6257
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The aim of this article is to problematize one of the most audacious tenets of the new consensus, namely the revolutionary character of fascism, by linking together the experience of the state of siege and the emergence of the fascist movement in interwar Romania. It tries to do so by drawing on the philosophical underpinnings of the paradigm of the state of exception developed by Giorgio Agamben and Walter Benjamin’s critique of law and violence. In a first part my aim is to present the main arguments espoused in defending the view according to which fascist movements were professing an authentic revolutionary radical politics. Secondly, I will turn towards legal critique and to the work of Giorgio Agamben in order to build a topography of the relation between law and the force of state. In a third part I will focus on the uses and the historical meaning of the state of siege in post-First World War Romania. This article argues that the emergence of the fascist movement in Romania is an event strongly embedded in the political, legal and symbolic dynamics entailed by the state of exception rather than the expression of a revolutionary thrust.

© 2013 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00202006
2013-01-01
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22116249/2/2/22116257_002_02_S006_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00202006&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Roger Griffin, ‘Introduction’, in International Fascism: Theories, Causes and the New Consensus, ed. Roger Griffin (London: Arnold, 1998), 14. Or, in a highly synthetic vein, ‘Fascism is a political ideology whose mythic core in its various permutations is a palingenetic form of populist ultra-nationalism.’ Roger Griffin, The Nature of Fascism (London: Routledge, 1993), 26. See also, Roger Griffin, ‘Fascim’s new faces [and new facelessness] in the post-fascist epoch,’ in Fascism Past and Present, West and East, ed. Roger Griffin, Werner Loh and Andreas Umland, (Stuttgart: Ibidem, 2006), 41.
     [Google Scholar]
  2.  Roger Griffin, ‘Introduction,’14.
     [Google Scholar]
  3.  Roger Griffin, ‘Modernity Under the New Order: The Fascist Project for Managing the Future’, in A Fascist Century, ed. Matthew Feldman (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 24-45.
     [Google Scholar]
  4.  Roger Griffin, Modernism and Fascism: The Sense of a Beginning Under Mussolini and Hitler (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
     [Google Scholar]
  5.  Emilio Gentile, The Sacralization of Politics in Fascist Italy (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996); Constantin Iordachi, Charisma, Politics and Violence: The Legion of the ‘Archangel Michael’ in Inter-War Romania (Trondheim: PEECS, 2004).
     [Google Scholar]
  6.  Robert Paxton, The Anatomy of Fascism (London: Allen Lane, 2004), 219.
     [Google Scholar]
  7.  Michael Mann, Fascists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 12.
     [Google Scholar]
  8.  Michel Foucault, L’ordre du discours (Paris : Gallimard, 1971), 10.
     [Google Scholar]
  9.  Michel Foucault, L’archéologie du savoir (Paris : Gallimard, 1969), 241.
     [Google Scholar]
  10.  Benjamin, Arcades Project, 463.
     [Google Scholar]
  11.  Paul Ricoeur, De l’interprétation (Paris: Le Seuil, 1965), 40-44.
     [Google Scholar]
  12.  Roger Griffin, ‘Exploding the Continuum of History’, in A Fascist Century: Essays by Roger Griffin, ed. Matthew Feldman (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 46-68.
     [Google Scholar]
  13.  Matthew Feldman, ‘The Fascination of Fascism: A Concluding Interview with Roger Griffin’, in A Fascist Century: Essays by Roger Griffin, ed. Matthew Feldman (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 210.
     [Google Scholar]
  14.  See, e.g., Nicos Poulantzas, Fascism and Dictatorship: The Third International and the Problem of Fascism (London: Verso, 1979).
     [Google Scholar]
  15.  Griffin, ‘Exploding the Continuum of History’, 53.
     [Google Scholar]
  16.  But see Daniel Woodley, ‘Between Myth and Modernity: Fascism as Anti-Praxis,’European Journal of Political Theory11 (2012): 362-79, where the author finds rather problematic Griffin’s use of the concept of ideology.
     [Google Scholar]
  17.  Ernst Nolte, Marxism, Fascism, Cold War (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1982), 25.
     [Google Scholar]
  18.  Griffin, ‘Exploding the Continuum of History,’67-68.
     [Google Scholar]
  19.  Roger Eatwell, ‘Reflections on Fascism and Religion’, Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions4 (2003): 146-66.
     [Google Scholar]
  20.  Eugen Weber, ‘Romania,’ in The European Right : A Historical Profile, ed. Hans Rogger and Eugen Weber (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1965), 96. See also, Eugen Weber, ‘Men of the Archangel,’ Journal of Contemporary History 1 (1966): 101-126, 103.
     [Google Scholar]
  21.  Weber, ‘Men of the Archangel,’103.
     [Google Scholar]
  22.  Constantin Iordachi, ‘God’s Chosen Warriors: Romantic Palingenesis,’ in Comparative Fascist Studies: New Perspectives, ed. Constantin Iordachi (London: Routledge, 2010), 320.
     [Google Scholar]
  23.  Philip Morgan, Fascism in Europe 1919-1945 (London: Routledge, 2003), 45.
     [Google Scholar]
  24.  See, e.g. Carl Levy, ‘Fascism, National Socialism and Conservatives in Europe, 1914-1945: Issues for Comparativists,’Contemporary European History8 (1999): 97-126. With specific reference to Romania, see Rebecca Ann Haynes, ‘Reluctant Allies? Iuliu Maniu and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu against King Carol II of Romania,’ The Slavonic and East European Review 85 (2007): 105-134.
     [Google Scholar]
  25.  Payne, A History of Fascism, 79.
     [Google Scholar]
  26.  Peter Goodrich, ‘Law and Modernity,’Modern Law Review49 (1986): 551.
     [Google Scholar]
  27.  Goodrich, ‘Law and Modernity,’551.
     [Google Scholar]
  28.  Goodrich, ‘Law and Modernity,’548.
     [Google Scholar]
  29.  See, Evgeny Pashukanis, ‘The General Theory of Law and Marxism,’ in Selected Writings on Marxism and Law, ed. Piers Beirne and Robert Shalet (London: Academic Press, 1980 [1924]), 37-132.
     [Google Scholar]
  30.  Schmitt, Political Theology, 5.
     [Google Scholar]
  31.  Agamben, State of exception, 41.
     [Google Scholar]
  32.  Agamben, State of exception, 31.
     [Google Scholar]
  33.  Agamben, Homo Sacer, 27.
     [Google Scholar]
  34.  Schmitt, Political Theology, 13.
     [Google Scholar]
  35.  Benjamin, ‘Critique of Violence’, 296.
     [Google Scholar]
  36.  Pierre Legendre, ‘The Other Dimension of Law,’Cardozo Law Review16 (1995): 950.
     [Google Scholar]
  37.  Peter Goodrich, ‘The Rise of Legal Formalism: Or the Defenses of Legal Faith,’Legal Studies3 (1983): 254.
     [Google Scholar]
  38.  Juan J. Linz, Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2000), 137.
     [Google Scholar]
  39.  Agamben, Homo Sacer, 14.
     [Google Scholar]
  40.  Constantin Dissesco, ‘L’évolution du droit public roumain,’ in Les transformations du droit dans les principaux pays depuis cinquante ans: livre du cinquantenaire de la Société de législation comparée (Paris : L.G.D.J, 1922), 301.
     [Google Scholar]
  41.  Dumitru Popescu, Regimul juridic al stării de asediu (Iași: Institutul de Arte Grafice Alexandru Terek, 1942), 28.
     [Google Scholar]
  42.  Pantelimonescu, Starea de asediu, 6; Popescu, Regimul juridic, 28-30.
     [Google Scholar]
  43.  Théodore Reinach, De l’état de siège: étude juridique et historique (Paris : F. Pichon, 1885), 101.
     [Google Scholar]
  44.  Reinach, De l’état de siège, 99.
     [Google Scholar]
  45.  Popescu, Regimul juridic, 30-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  46.  Pantelimonescu, Starea de asediu, 32-45.
     [Google Scholar]
  47.  Anna-Lena Svensson-McCarthy, The International Law of Human Rights and States of Exception (The Hague: Kluwer, 1998), 37 [original emphasis].
     [Google Scholar]
  48.  Jean Cruet, Etude juridique de l’arbitraire gouvernamental et administratif (Paris: Librairie nouvelle de droit et de jurisprudence, 1906), 158.
     [Google Scholar]
  49.  Popescu, Regimul juridic, 30.
     [Google Scholar]
  50.  De Chénier, De l’État de siège, 16.
     [Google Scholar]
  51.  Ibid., 371. See also Popescu, Regimul juridic, 56-57.
     [Google Scholar]
  52.  Pantelimonescu, Starea de asediu, 21.
     [Google Scholar]
  53.  Cour de Cassation, 29 June1832, Journal du Palais, Vol. 24, 1841, 1219-23.
  54.  Gerald M. Platt, ‘An Alternative Theory,’ in International Fascism: Theories, Causes and the New Consensus, ed. Roger Griffin (London: Arnold, 1998 [1980]), 208.
     [Google Scholar]
  55.  Keith Hitchins, Rumania 1866-1947 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 288-91.
     [Google Scholar]
  56.  Charles Upson Clark, Bessarabia, Russia and Roumania on the Black Sea (New York : Dodd, Mead & Co., 1927), 223-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  57.  Clark, United Roumania, 173.
     [Google Scholar]
  58.  Pantelimonescu, Starea de asediu, 37.
     [Google Scholar]
  59.  Pantelimonescu, Starea de asediu, 38.
     [Google Scholar]
  60.  Clark, Bessarabia, Russia and Roumania, 223-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  61.  Agamben, Homo Sacer, 20.
     [Google Scholar]
  62.  Clark, United Romania, 316-17 ; Zigu Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right: The Nineteen Thirties (Boulder: East European Monographs, 1999), 7-75.
     [Google Scholar]
  63.  Payne, A History of Fascism, 71.
     [Google Scholar]
  64.  Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, Pentru legionari (Sibiu: Totul Pentru Ţară, 1936), 4.
     [Google Scholar]
  65.  Rebecca Haynes, ‘Corneliu Zelea Codreanu: The Romanian “New Man”,’ in In the Shadow of Hitler: Personalities of the Right in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. Rebecca Haynes and Martyn Rady (London: Tauris, 2011), 171.
     [Google Scholar]
  66.  Stanley Payne, ‘The NDH State in Comparative Perspective,’Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions7 (2006): 411.
     [Google Scholar]
  67.  Constantin Iordachi, ‘God’s Chosen Warriors: Romantic Palingenesis,’ in Comparative Fascist Studies: New Perspectives, ed. Constantin Iordachi (London: Routledge, 2010), 320-321.
     [Google Scholar]
  68.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 265; Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 5; Iordachi, ‘God’s Chosen Warriors,’ 338.
     [Google Scholar]
  69.  Iordachi, ‘God’s Chosen Warriors,’339.
     [Google Scholar]
  70.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 265; Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 9.
     [Google Scholar]
  71.  Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 28.
     [Google Scholar]
  72.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 266.
     [Google Scholar]
  73.  Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 27.
     [Google Scholar]
  74.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 267.
     [Google Scholar]
  75.  See, e.g., Constantin Costa-Foru, Abuzurile și crimele Siguranței generale a Statului (Bucharest: Tipografia Triumful, 1925).
     [Google Scholar]
  76.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 266.
     [Google Scholar]
  77.  Ibid. See also Mann, Fascists, 265.
     [Google Scholar]
  78.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 267-268.
     [Google Scholar]
  79.  Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 15; Mann, Fascists, 266-267.
     [Google Scholar]
  80.  Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 20.
     [Google Scholar]
  81.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 270.
     [Google Scholar]
  82.  Haynes, ‘Corneliu Zelea Codreanu: The Romanian “New Man”,’176.
     [Google Scholar]
  83.  Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, Cărticica șefului de cuib (Bucharest: Tipografia C.S.M.C., 1940), 47.
     [Google Scholar]
  84.  Codreanu, Pentru legionari, 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  85.  Ornea,The Romanian Extreme Right, 271.
     [Google Scholar]
  86.  Constantin Iordachi, ‘Charisma Religion and Ideology: Romania’s Interwar Legion of the Archangel Michael,’ in Ideologies and National Identities, ed. John R. Lampe and Mark Mazower (Budapest: Central European University Press, 2004), 19-53.
     [Google Scholar]
  87.  Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, 1966), 376.
     [Google Scholar]
  88.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 271-73.
     [Google Scholar]
  89.  Benjamin, ‘Critique of violence,’281.
     [Google Scholar]
  90.  Agamben, State of exception, 41-42.
     [Google Scholar]
  91.  Constantin Dissesco, Les origines du droit roumain (Paris: Chamerot and Renouard, 1899), 69.
     [Google Scholar]
  92.  Ornea, The Romanian Extreme Right, 25-31.
     [Google Scholar]
  93.  Benjamin, ‘Critique of Violence,’297.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00202006
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): fascism; Giorgio Agamben; law; Romania; state of exception; state of siege; violence; Walter Benjamin

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error