OA

Back to the Future

References

1.  Roger Griffin, ‘The Primacy of Culture: The Current Growth (or Manufacture) of Consensus within Fascist Studies,’Journal of Contemporary History37, no. 1 (2002): 21–43, and Jan Nelis, ‘Italian Fascism and Culture: Some Notes on Investigation,’ Historia Actual Online 9 (2006): 141–151 (http://www.historia-actual.com).
   [Google Scholar]
2.  Renzo De Felice, Mussolini il duce: I. Gli anni del consenso 1929–1936 (Torino: Einaudi, 1974). On the controversy surrounding the notion of consensus, see, among others, Michael A. Ledeen, ‘Renzo De Felice and the Controversy over Italian Fascism,’ Journal of Contemporary History 11, no. 4 (1976): 269–283, and Emilio Gentile, Renzo De Felice: lo storico e il personaggio (Roma, Bari: Laterza, 2003).
   [Google Scholar]
3.  Emilio Gentile, Il culto del littorio (Roma, Bari: Laterza, 1993), as well as a preliminary study published in the Journal of Contemporary History: Emilio Gentile, ‘Fascism as Political Religion,’ Journal of Contemporary History 25, no. 2–3 (1990): 229–251. For up to date discussions on the concept of political religion, see Roger Griffin, ‘Cloister or Cluster? The Implications of Emilio Gentile’s Ecumenical Theory of Political Religion for the Study of Extremism,’ Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 6, no. 1 (2005): 33–52; David D. Roberts, ‘“Political Religion” and the Totalitarian Departures of Inter-war Europe: On the Uses and Disadvantages of an Analytical Category,’ Contemporary European History 18, no. 4 (2009): 381–414, and Jan Nelis, ‘The Clerical Response to a Totalitarian Political Religion: La Civiltà Cattolica and Italian Fascism,’ Journal of Contemporary History 46, no. 2 (2011): 245–270.
   [Google Scholar]
4.  Romke Visser, ‘Fascist Doctrine and the Cult of the Romanità,’Journal of Contemporary History27, no. 1 (1992): 5–22. Studies such as Visser’s are, among others, Marla Stone, ‘A Flexible Rome: Fascism and the Cult of Romanità,’ in Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945, ed. Catharine Edwards (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 205–220.
   [Google Scholar]
5.  Jan Nelis, ‘Constructing Fascist Identity: Benito Mussolini and the Myth of Romanità,’Classical World100, no. 4 (2007): 408.
   [Google Scholar]
6.  Galassi Paluzzi in1941, speech conserved in the archivio storico of the Istituto di Studi Romani, Affari generali section, map 11, submap 25.
7.  Antonio La Penna, ‘Il culto della romanità nel periodo fascista: La rivista “Roma” e l’Istituto di Studi Romani,’Italia contemporanea217 (1999): 606–630.
   [Google Scholar]
8.  Pietro De Francisci, ‘Per una storia italiana dell’impero romano,’ in Sotto il segno di Clio: Con una lettera di Mussolini, Pietro De Francisci (Roma: Edizioni di Novissima, 1935), 143–153.
   [Google Scholar]
9.  Pietro De Francisci, Sotto il segno di Clio : Con una lettera di Mussolini (Roma: Edizioni di Novissima, 1935), 9–10.
   [Google Scholar]
10.  Jan Nelis, ‘Imperialismo e mito della romanità nella Terza Roma Mussoliniana,’Forum Romanum Belgicum2010 (http://kadoc.kuleuven.be/bhir-ihbr/fr/3_pub_foru.php, article 4).
    [Google Scholar]
11.  Pietro De Francisci, Civiltà Romana (Roma: Istituto Nazionale di Cultura Fascista, 1939), 39.
    [Google Scholar]
12.  Jane Dunnett, ‘The Rhetoric of Romanità: Representations of Caesar in Fascist Theatre,’ in Julius Caesar in Western Culture, ed. Maria Wyke (Malden, Oxford, Victoria: Blackwell, 2006), 244–265.
    [Google Scholar]
13.  Pietro De Francisci, ‘Cesare,’ in Sotto il segno di Clio: Con una lettera di Mussolini, Pietro De Francisci (Roma: Edizioni di Novissima, 1935), 61–62.
    [Google Scholar]
14.  Pietro De Francisci, Celebrazione del bimillenario di Augusto (Milano: Bestetti, 1938), 30.
    [Google Scholar]
15.  Pietro De Francisci, ‘La costituzione Augustea,’ in Augustus: Studi in occasione del bimillenario augusteo, V. Arangio-Ruiz et al. (Roma: Reale Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, 1938), 61–100.
    [Google Scholar]
16.  De Francisci, ‘La costituzione Augustea,’ 100. One year later, the author would express a similar idea, this time in the context of the mentioned publication on the ‘juridical foundations of the principate’: De Francisci, ‘Le basi giuridiche del principato,’37.
    [Google Scholar]
17.  Pietro De Francisci, ‘Tradizione e rivoluzione nella Storia di Roma,’Nuova Antologia1556 (1937): 208–218.
    [Google Scholar]
18.  On the oath, see Helmut Goetz, Der freie Geist und seine Widersacher (Frankfurt am Main: Haag + Herchen, 1993), and Giorgio Boatti, Preferirei di no: Le storie dei dodici professori che si opposero a Mussolini (Torino: Einaudi, 2001).
    [Google Scholar]
19.  Ettore Ciccotti, Profilo di Augusto (con un appendice sulle leggi matrimoniali di Augusto) (Torino: Einaudi, 1938).
    [Google Scholar]
20.  Jan Nelis, ‘Ettore Ciccotti’s Profilo di Augusto and the Giuramento of 1931,’Mediterraneo Antico: Economie, Società, Culture12, no. 1–2 (2009): 283–295.
    [Google Scholar]
21.  Roger Griffin, Modernism and Fascism: The Sense of a Beginning under Mussolini and Hitler (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
    [Google Scholar]
22.  Jan Nelis, ‘Modernist Neo-classicism and Antiquity in the Political Religion of Nazism: Adolf Hitler as Poietes of the Third Reich,’Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions9, no. 4 (2008): 475–490.
    [Google Scholar]
23.  Emilio Gentile, Fascismo di pietra (Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2007). See also a forthcoming and very promising monograph by Aristotle Kallis The ‘Third Rome’, 1922–1943: The Making of the Fascist Capital (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014).
    [Google Scholar]