OA

Approaching the Social History of Romanian Fascism

References

1.  For example, Roger Griffin, ‘The Primacy of Culture: The Current Growth (or Manufacture) of Consensus within Fascist Studies,’Journal of Contemporary History37 (2002): 21–43; Marius Turda, ‘Conservative Palingenesis and Cultural Modernism in Early Twentieth-century Romania,’ Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 9, no. 4 (2008): 437–53; Daniel Ursprung, ‘Faschismus in Ostmittel- und Südosteuropa: Theorien, Ansätze, Fragestellungen,’ in Der Einfluss von Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus auf Minderheiten in Ostmittel- und Südosteuropa, ed. Harald Roth and Mariana Hausleitner (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2006), 9–52; Alessandra Tarquini, Storia della cultura fascista (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2011).
   [Google Scholar]
2.  Constantin Iordachi, ‘Fascism on Southeastern Europe: A Comparison between Romania’s Legion of the Archangel Michael and Croatia’s Ustaša,’ in Entangled Histories of the Balkans. Vol. 2. Transfers of Political Ideologies and Institutions, ed. Roumen Daskalov and Diana Mishkova (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2014), 355–68, here 365; Sven Reichardt, ‘Neue Wege der vergleichenden Faschismusforschung,’ Mittelweg 36 16, no. 1 (2007): 9–25; cf. Armin Heinen and Oliver Jens Schmitt, ‘Einführung,’ in Inszenierte Gegenmacht von rechts: Die ‘Legion Erzengel Michael’ in Rumänien 1918–1938, ed. Armin Heinen and Oliver Jens Schmitt (Munich: Oldenbourg, 2013), 7–12.
   [Google Scholar]
3.  Irina Livezeanu, Cultural Politics in Greater Romania: Regionalism, Nation Building & Ethnic Struggle, 1918–1930 (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995).
   [Google Scholar]
4.  Viorica Nicolenco, Extrema dreaptă în Basarabia, 1923–1940 (Chişinău: Civitas, 1999); Puiu Dumitru Bordeiu, Mişcarea legionară în Dobrogea între 1933–1941 (Constanţa: Ex ponto, 2003); Radu Florian Bruja, Extrema dreaptă în Bucovina (Târgovişte: Cetate de Scaun, 2012).
   [Google Scholar]
5.  Florin-Răzvan Mihai, ‘Activitatea Mişcării Legionare în judeţul Covurlui (1927–1933): Lideri locali, tehnici de propagandă, succese electorale,’Erasmus15 (2006–2009): 47–60
   [Google Scholar]
6.  Cf. Michael Mann, Fascism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 15–17, 266–72.
   [Google Scholar]
7.  Detlef Mühlberger, ed., The Social Bases of European Fascist Movements (London: Croom Helm, 1987), 299.
   [Google Scholar]
8.  Klaus Heitmann, ‘“Das rumänische Phänomen”: Die Frage des nationalen Spezifikums in der Selbstbesinnung der rumänischen Kultur seit 1900,’Südost-Forschungen29 (1970): 171–236.
   [Google Scholar]
9.  Armin Heinen, ‘Wahlmaschine: Die Legion “Erzengel Michael”, die Wahlen 1931–1937 und die Integrationskrise des rumänischen Staates,’ in Inszenierte Gegenmacht von rechts, 144–45.
   [Google Scholar]
10.  Hans-Christian Maner, Parlamentarismus in Rumänien (1930–1940) (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1997), 52.
    [Google Scholar]
11.  Liliana Beu, ‘Câteva repere privind originile şi familia omului politic I.G. Duca,’Buridava5 (2007): 135–41.
    [Google Scholar]
12.  Cf. Gheorghe Dumitraşcu, ‘Aspecte privind mişcarea muncitorească din judeţul Vîlcea în anii crizei economice (1929–1933),’Buridava4 (1982): 171–79.
    [Google Scholar]
13.  Dumitraşcu, ‘Aspecte,’171–72.
    [Google Scholar]
14.  Oliver Jens Schmitt, ‘Wer waren die rumänischen Legionäre? Eine Fallstudie zu faschistischen Kadern im ruralen Umland von Bukarest (1927–1941),’Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte(in print).
    [Google Scholar]
15.  Horia Bozdoghină, Antisemitismul lui A.C. Cuza în politica românească (Bucharest: Curtea veche, 2012); Lucian T. Butaru, Rasism românesc: Componenta rasială a discursului antisemit din România, până la al doilea război mondial (Cluj-Napoca: Editura Fundaţiei pentru Studii Europene, 2010).
    [Google Scholar]
16.  Sorin Oane, ‘Episcopul Râmnicului, Vartolomeu Stănescu,’Buridava6 (2008): 164–72.
    [Google Scholar]
17.  Ciprian-Marius Sîrbu, ‘Episcopii Râmnicului şi viaţa politică românească în perioada 1859–1918,’Buridava10 (2012): 162–87.
    [Google Scholar]
18.  Oane, ‘Episcopul Râmnicului,’165–69; Florin Müller, ‘Das Wunder von Maglavit,’ in Religion im Nationalstaat zwischen den Weltkriegen 1918–1939, ed. Hans-Christian Maner and Martin Schulze Wessel (Stuttgart: Steiner 2002), 189–97.
    [Google Scholar]
19.  Rebecca Haynes, ‘Work Camps, Commerce, and the Education of the “New Man” in the Romanian Legionary Movement,’The Historical Journal51 (2008): 943–67.
    [Google Scholar]
20.  Matthew Feldman and Marius Turda, ‘“Clerical Fascism” in Interwar Europe: An Introduction,’Totalitarian Movements and Political religions8 (2007): 205–12, especially 209; cf. Roger Eatwell, ‘Reflections on Fascism and Religion,’ in Religious Fundamentalism and Political Extremism, ed. Ami Pedahzur and Leonard Weinberg (Special issue of Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions 4, no. 3 (2003)): 23–26. The discussion about the relation of the Romanian Orthodox Church and the Legionary Movement has produced an impressive bibliography: Mirel Bănică, Biserica ortodoxă română: Stat şi societate în anii ´30 (Iaşi: Polirom, 2007); Roland Clark, Nationalism, Ethnotheology, and Mysticism in Interwar Romania (Pittsburgh: The center for Russian and East European Studies, 2009); Radu Harald Dinu,‘The Legionary Movement between “political religion” and “collective effervescence”,’ Arhivele Totalitarismului 16, no. 3–4 (2008): 16–25, in particular 17; Mihai Chioveanu, ‘Arhanghelul acestei lumi: Legionarismul ca religie politică,’ Studia politica: Romanian Political Science Review 7 (2007): 555–82; Olivier Gillet, ’Orthodoxie et extrêmes droites en Roumanie des années 1930: L’ultranationalisme contemporain,’ Traverse 7 (2000): 44–55; George Enache, ‘Église, société, nation, état en Roumanie pendant l’entre-deux-guerres: L’Église Orthodoxe Roumaine et “la tentation du totalitarisme droitiste”,’ Revistă Teologică 94 (2012): 301–26; Ionuţ Florin Biliuţă, ‘Between Orthodoxy and the Nation: Definition of Romanianness in Interwar Romania’ (Masterthesis Central European University, Budapest, 2007), available at http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2007/biliuta_ionut.pdf, accessed July 14, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
21.  Oliver Jens Schmitt, ‘“Eine mächtige Bewegung auf den Dörfern”: Mechanismen der politischen Mobilisierung der rumänischen Legionärsbewegung im ländlichen Raum (1933–1937): Vorskizze zu einer Sozialgeschichte der “Eisernen Garde”,’ in Nation, Nationalitäten und Nationalismus im östlichen Europa, ed. Marija Wakounig, Wolfgang Mueller and Michael Portmann (Vienna: lit, 2010), 389–418, here 418; the ratio is lower in traditional strongholds like Câmpulung (3.8), Rădăuţi (4.02), Suceava (4.76), it is high in areas like Romanaţi in Oltenia (6.02).
    [Google Scholar]