2004
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2211-6249
  • E-ISSN: 2211-6257

Abstract

This article focuses on the transfer of the Nazi legal and ideological model to East Central Europe and its subsequent adoption, modification and fusion with local legal-political practices. To illustrate this process, we explore the evolution of the anti-Semitic policy of the Antonescu regime in Romania (1940–1944) from an under-researched perspective: the activity of the Nazi ‘advisors on the Jewish Question’ dispatched to Bucharest. Based on a wide range of published and unpublished archival sources, we attempt to provide answers to the following questions: To what extent did the Third Reich shape Romania’s anti-Semitic polices during the Second World War? What was the role played by the Nazi advisors in this process? In answering these questions, special attention is devoted to the activity of the Gustav Richter, who served as [advisor to the Jewish and Aryanization questions] in the German Legation in Bucharest from 1st of April 1941 until 23 August 1944. We argue that, by evaluating the work of the Nazi experts in Bucharest, we can better grasp the immediate as well as the longer-term objectives followed by the Third Reich in Romania on the ‘Jewish Question,’ and the evolution of this issue within the context of the Romanian-German diplomatic relations and political interactions. By taking into account a variety of internal and external factors and by reconstructing the complicated web of political and bureaucratic interactions that led to the crystallization of General Ion Antonescu’s policy towards the Jews, we are able to provide a richer and more nuanced analysis of German-Romanian relations during the Second World War.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00401003
2015-04-04
2025-12-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22116249/4/1/22116257_004_01_S003_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00401003&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Mark Mazower, Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century (New York: Vintage, 2000), 140.
    [Google Scholar]
  2.  Henk te Velde, ‘Political Transfer: An Introduction,’European Review of History12 (2005): 208.
    [Google Scholar]
  3.  Paul DiMaggio and Walter Powell, ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,’American Sociological Review48 (1983), esp. 149–150; and Paul Colomy, ‘Neofunctionalism and Neoinstitutionalism: Human Agency and Interest in Institutional Change,’ Sociological Forum 13, no. 2 (1998): 265–300.
    [Google Scholar]
  4.  Ioanid, The Holocaust in Romania, 289.
    [Google Scholar]
  5.  See Constantin Iordachi, ‘The Unyielding Boundaries of Citizenship: The Emancipation of “Non-Citizens” in Romania, 1866–1918,’European Review of History8, no. 2 (2001): 157–186.
    [Google Scholar]
  6.  Andrei Pippidi, ‘The Mirror and Behind It: The Image of the Jews in the Romanian Society,’Shvut: Jewish Problems in Eastern Europe16 (1992): 73–83.
    [Google Scholar]
  7.  Leonida Colescu, Analiza rezultatelor recensământului general al populaţiei României din 1899 (Bucharest: Institutul Central de Statistică, 1944), 81–82.
    [Google Scholar]
  8.  Nathan Michael Gelber, ‘The Intervention of German Jews at the Berlin Congress, 1878,’Leo Baek Institute Yearbookv (1960): 223.
    [Google Scholar]
  9.  Ion I. Moţa, ‘Răspuns (la invitaţia dlui Prof. G. Bogdan-Duică),’Pământul Strămoşesc, ii, no. 1 (1928): 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10.  Moţa, ‘Răspuns (la invitaţia dlui Prof. G. Bogdan-Duică),’11.
    [Google Scholar]
  11.  Mihail Polihroniade, ‘Sensul revoluţiei naţionale,’Axa, ii, no. 15 (1933): 5.
    [Google Scholar]
  12.  Eugen Petit, ‘Originea etnică (i),’Dreptul[The Law], lxviii (28 July 1940) 18, 117–119; and ‘Originea etnică (ii),’ Dreptul, lxviii (15 Sept. 1940) 20, 133–135.
    [Google Scholar]
  13.  Petit, ‘Originea etnică (i),’117.
    [Google Scholar]
  14.  Petit cites A. C. Cuza, Studii economice-politice (1890–1930) (Bucharest: Imprimeriile Independența, 1930).
    [Google Scholar]
  15.  See Hildegard von Kotze, ‘Hitlers Sicherheitsdienst im Ausland,’ in Die Politische Meinung8 (1963), 77–80; Heinz Höhne, Der Orden unter dem Totenkopf: Die Geschichte der ss (Gütersloh : Sigbert Mohn, 1967), 262; Michael Wildt, Generation des Unbedingten: Das Führungskorps des Reichssicherheitshauptamtes (Hamburg: Hamburger, 2003), 647.
    [Google Scholar]
  16.  Troncotă, Eugen Cristescu, 146.
    [Google Scholar]
  17.  Walter Hagen, Die geheime Front: Organisation, Personen und Aktionen des deutschen Geheimdienstes (Linz-Wien: Nibelungen Verlag, 1950), 285–286; Armin Heinen, Legiunea ‘Arhanghelul Mihai’: Mişcare socială şi organizaţie politică: Contribuţie la problema fascismului internaţional (Bucharest: Humanitas, 1999), 421.
    [Google Scholar]
  18.  Hagen, Die geheime Front, 289–292; Simion, Regimul politic din România, 287–294; Hillgruber, Hitler, Regele Carol şi Mareşalul Antonescu, 158; Lecca, Eu i-am salvat, 139–146, 149–154, 156–157; Troncotă, Eugen Cristescu, 6, 146, 208, 318, 330, 345, 367–370, 398; Heinen, Legiunea ‘Arhanghelul Mihail,’ 434–435; Witte, Der Dienstkalender Heinrich Himmlers, 121; Heinz Höhne, Der Orden unter dem Totenkopf, 267–268; Cristian Scarlat, ed., Diplomaţi germani la Bucureşti 1937–1944: Din memoriile dr. Rolf Pusch, ataşat de legaţie, şi dr. Gerhard Stelzer consilier de legaţie (Bucharest: All Educational, 2001), 141–144.
    [Google Scholar]
  19.  Cited in Lya Benjamin, ‘Studiu introductiv,’ in Evreii din România între anii 1940–1944, vol. 1: Legislaţia antievreiască, ed. Lya Benjamin (Bucharest: Hasefer, 1993), xxxvi (English translation by Constantin Iordachi).
    [Google Scholar]
  20.  After leaving Romania in1944, Richter was arrested and transported to the Soviet Union. Released from captivity on October 13, 1955, Richter returned to Germany. In 1981 he was set to trial and in 1982 sentenced to four years imprisonment. To reconstruct Richter’s career, we have used Richter’s ss officer file, the documentation of the lawsuit filed against him by West German authorities, and secondary literature on the topic. On Richter’s life and activity, see bb, Berlin Documenter Center, sso Akte Gustav Richter; Bundesarchiv Ludwigsburg, 505 ar-z 16/61. Urteil lg Frankenthal - 141 Js 92131/76 vom 11.01.1982; and amae, fund 14/Reprezentanţi-Germania, R 24-file Gustav Richter/-consilier pentru chestiunile evreieşti-ataşat de poliţie.
  21.  Ancel, The History of the Holocaust in Romania, 210.
    [Google Scholar]
  22.  Browning, The Final Solution, 52.
    [Google Scholar]
  23.  Browning, The Final Solution, 53.
    [Google Scholar]
  24.  Martin Broszat, ‘Das Dritte Reich und die rumänische Judenpolitik,’Gutachten des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte1 (1958): 146.
    [Google Scholar]
  25.  Browning, The Final Solution, 126.
    [Google Scholar]
  26.  See ‘Decretul-lege no.1216, pentru înființarea Centrului Național de Românizare, May 3, 1941,’ (modified by Decree no. 2816 issued on October 10, 1941, and Decree no. 692 on March 6, 1942) in Codul de Românizare, ed. Nicolae D. Ghimpa et al. (Bucharest: Editura Ziarului Universul, 1942), 30–43, 64–82, 102.
  27.  Mihai Antonescu, May 2, 1941, Codul De Românizare, 136.
    [Google Scholar]
  28.  Scarlat, Diplomaţi germani la Bucureşti 1937–1944, 168.
    [Google Scholar]
  29.  Lecca, Eu i-am salvat, 214–215.
    [Google Scholar]
  30.  Lecca, Eu i-am salvat, 216.
    [Google Scholar]
  31.  Jürgen Rohwer, Die Versenkung der jüdischen Flüchtlingstransporter Struma und Mefkure im Schwarzen Meer (Februar 1942, August 1944) (Frankfurt am Main: Bernard und Graefe, 1965); Calafeteanu, Emigrarea populaţiei evreieşti.
    [Google Scholar]
  32.  Gheorghe Barbul,Memorial Antonescu: Al treilea om al Axei (Iași: Institutul European, 1992), 134.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00401003
Loading
/content/journals/10.1163/22116257-00401003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error