2004
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Abstract

Scholars have frequently alluded to the normative value of the religious free market fostered by the twin legal guarantees of the free exercise of religion and the absence of state establishment of religion. But given that the desirable normative interpretations of these two clauses differ widely, the nature of the resulting market is inevitably dependent on one’s choice of these contested interpretations. Similarly, the “entitlement to free competition” depends on the definition of “religion.” The present article deconstructs the religious free market into its legal components and discusses critically how the different interpretations and combinations of these legal components materially affect the resulting religious market.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00301001
2014-11-24
2025-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/3/1/22124810_003_01_S001_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00301001&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Thio Li-Ann, “Contentious Liberty: Regulating Religious Propagation in a Multi-Religious Secular Democracy”, Singapore J Legal Studies(2010), 484, 510; Stephen C. Berkwitz, “Religious Conflict and the Politics of Conversion in Sri Lanka” in Rosalind I.J. Hackett (ed.), Proselytization Revisited: Rights Talk, Free Markets and Culture Wars (Equinox 2008), 216.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00301001
Loading
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00301001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): establishment clause; free exercise; religious free market
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error