f Remorse, Demeanor, and the Consequences of Misinterpretation

References

1.  See Carla Ann Robbins, “Mr. Bush Gets Another Look into Putin’s Eyes”, New York Times, 30 Jun. 2007 (recounting 2001 comment).
   [Google Scholar]
2.  See New America Foundation.2003. “Bush looks into Putin’s soul; fails to see tyrant”. Retrieved 30 Jun. 2014, http://www.newamerica.net/node/6336.
3.  See, e.g., Policev. Razamjoo, [2005] dcr 408; 2005 nzdcrlexis 3 (14 Jan. 2005); The Queen and Anwer Shah Wafiq Sayed (19 Aug. 2010, District Court of Western Australia); Davis v. R., ukhl 36 (18 June 2008).
   [Google Scholar]
4.  See, e.g., Coyv. Iowa, 487 u.s. 1012, 1017 (1988) (discussing the centuries-old belief that face-to-face encounter is essential to a fair trial). See also Olin Guy Wellborn III, “Demeanor”, 76 Cornell L. Rev. (1991), 1075, 1076–1077 (citing sources tying the importance of demeanor as an indicator of credibility to the preference for in-court testimony).
   [Google Scholar]
5.  Timony, supra note 4 at 921 (quoting Henry S. Sahm, “Demeanor Evidence; Elusive and Intangible Imponderables”, 47 aba J. (1961), 580, 580).
6.  Dean E. Murphy, “At Peterson Sentencing, a Family’s Anger”, The New York TimesA20 (17 Mar. 2005).
   [Google Scholar]
7.  See, e.g., Coyv. Iowa, 487 u.s. 1012 (1988) (holding that the confrontation clause was violated when a witness testified from behind a screen). The right is, nevertheless, not absolute. See Maryland v. Craig, 497 u.s. 836 (1990) (holding that the confrontation clause was not violated when the witness testified via closed-circuit television).
   [Google Scholar]
8.  See, e.g., Romerov. State, 173 S.W. 3d 502 (Crim. Ct. App. Tx. 2005).
   [Google Scholar]
9.  See, e.g., Coyv. Iowa, supra note 7 and Maryland v. Craig, supra note 22.
   [Google Scholar]
10.  Timony, supra note 4 at 921 (quoting Henry S. Sahm, “Demeanor Evidence; Elusive and Intangible Imponderables”, 47 aba J. (1961), 580, 580).
11.  Cole, supra note 34 at 51 (discussing the findings of Peter Hobson on theory of mind and autism).
12.  Cole, supra note 34 at 54–55.
13.  See, e.g., Ickes, supra note 36.
14.  See, e.g., Deborah Franklin. (2009). “Disgust or Anger? Some Looks Don’t Translate”. National Public Radio. Retrieved 30 Jun. 2014, www.npr.org/blogs/health/2009/08/to_spot_an_eastwest_difference.html See also Everett and Nienstedt supra note 47 at 117–118, discussing “culturally defined inhibitions that preclude the open demonstration of certain emotional expressions.”
15.  Duncan, supra note 16.
16.  Sundby, “The Capital Jury and Absolution”, supranote 18; Craig Haney, Lorelei Sontag, and Sally Constanzo, “Deciding to Take a Life: Capital Juries, Sentencing Instructions, and the Jurisprudence of Death”, 50 Journal of Social Issues (2010), 149; Eisenberg et al., “But Was He Sorry? The Role of Remorse in Capital Sentencing”, 83 Cornell L Rev (1998), 1599, 1604-1607; William S. Geimer and Jonathan Amsterdam, “Why Jurors Vote Life or Death: Operative Factors in Ten Florida Death Penalty Cases”, 15 Am. J. Crim. L 1, (1987–1988), 16–17. See also M. Kimberly MacLin, Conn Downs, Otto H. HacLin, and Kather M. Caspers, “The Effect of Defendant Facial Expression on Mock Juror Decision-making: The Power of Remorse”, 11 North American Journal of Psychology (2009), 323 (finding that mock jurors are significantly more likely to reach a lenient verdict when a defendant’s facial expression is remorseful).
    [Google Scholar]
17.  Everett and Nienstedt, supra note 47.
18.  Weisman, “Showing Remorse”supranote 17 at 125.
    [Google Scholar]
19.  Weisman, “Being and Doing”supranote 63 at 58 (“He must be suffering for the suffering he caused; not the suffering he endured.”)
    [Google Scholar]
20.  Deigh, supra note 20.
21.  Haney, Sontag, and Constanzo, supra note 53 at 163. See also Michael E. Antonio, “Arbitrariness and the Death Penalty: How the Defendant’s Appearance During Trial Influences Capital Jurors’ Punishment Decision”, 24 Behavioral Sciences and the Law (2006), 215, 223 (finding that when jurors viewed the defendant in the courtroom as emotionally involved, sorry, and sincere they were much more likely to favor a life sentence than when they viewed the defendant in the courtroom as emotionally uninvolved and bored.
22.  Weisman, “Remorse and Psychopathy”supranote 14 at 203.
    [Google Scholar]
23.  Sundby, “The Capital Jury and Absolution”supranote 18 at 1563.
    [Google Scholar]
24.  Alex Kotlowitz, “In the Face of Death”, The New York Times Magazine32 (6 Jul., 2003).
    [Google Scholar]
25.  Zhong et al, supra note 54.
26.  Duncan, supra note 16 at 1499 (discussing problems of judging demeanor of juveniles in homicide cases).
27.  See Everett and Nienstedt, supra note 47 (finding that both race and ethnicity affected evaluations of expressions of remorse).
28.  Duncan, supra note 16.
29.  Bowers, et. al., supra note 49 at 244–252.
30.  Duncan, supra note 16 at 1476.
31.  Rachel Aviv, “No Remorse”, The New Yorker, 55, 63, January 2, 2012. This is problematic when investigative, mental health or legal personnel interpret the lack of “same day contrition” as evidence of remorselessness. Duncan, ibid., at 1491.
    [Google Scholar]
32.  Zhong, supra note 54.
33.  But see John M. Grohot.2011. “Can you Fake Feeling Remorse?”. PsychCentral. Retrieved 30 Jun. 2014, http://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2011/02/10/, reporting on a Canadian study that found certain indicators of fake remorse, including a greater range of emotional expressions, swinging from one emotion to another quickly, and speaking with hesitation.
34.  Murphy, “Remorse, Apology, and Mercy”, supranote 66 at 437.
    [Google Scholar]
35.  Murphy, “Remorse, Apology, and Mercy”, supranote 66 at 43.
    [Google Scholar]
36.  Proeve and Tudor, supra note 107 at 121.
37.  Weisman, “Showing Remorse”, supranote 17 at 7.
    [Google Scholar]
38.  Weisman, “Showing Remorse”supranote 17 at 7. Proeve and Tudor supra note 107 at 90, 120-12, though Pr.
    [Google Scholar]
39.  Murphy, “Remorse, Apology, and Mercy”, supranote 66 at 439.
    [Google Scholar]
40.  See, e.g., Eberhardt et al., supra note 46, and Bowers et al., supra note 49. See also Michael E. Antonio, “If Looks Could Kill: Identifying Trial Outcomes of Murder Cases Based on the Appearances of Capital Offenders Shown in Black-and-White Photographs”, in Burthold, G.R. (ed.), Psychology of Decision Making (2007), 8.
41.  Weisman, “Remorse and Psychopathy”, supranote 14 at 204.
    [Google Scholar]
42.  Ward, supra note 58.
43.  Weisman, “Showing Remorse”, supranote 17 at 128.
    [Google Scholar]
44.  See Duncan, supra note 16 at 1517–1518. Duncan cautions that though experts can be helpful, they are no panacea, in part because they may disagree.
45.  Everett and Nienstedt, supra note 47 (discussing the contribution of mental health experts to the process of judicial evaluation of remorse displayed by mentally ill offenders); Stobbs and Kebbell, supra note 52.