2004
Volume 4, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Abstract

In December 2014, the Polish Constitutional Tribunal struck down as unconstitutional a statute that prohibited all animal slaughter conducted without prior stunning. The Tribunal found this law contrary to Polish (and European) provisions regarding freedom of exercise of religion. In the present paper, we critically analyze the judgment through the lens of the general principle of religious equality. Considering other European cases involving ritual slaughter, as well as a landmark case on the matter, we propose a template for the discussion of equality in religious matters, based on a distinction between two formulas: “substantive” equality, which requires accommodation of religious requirements and often calls for exemptions from general rules; and “formal” equality, which calls for the equal application of general moral standards to all religious and non-religious practices. We conclude that a “formal” conception is also based on substantive moral considerations about the priority of some general moral requirements over those demanded by particular religious practices.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00403001
2016-09-10
2025-12-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/4/3/22124810_004_03_S001_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00403001&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Judgment of 25 May1998, as discussed in Schächten, Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] Jan. 15, 2002, 1 BvR 1783/99 at [10]. (Retrieved 20 May 2015), http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/EN/2002/01/rs20020115_1bvr178399en.html.
  2.  Haupt, “Free Exercise”, supranote 15, at 868.
    [Google Scholar]
  3.  Nattrass, supra note 18, at 301–302.
  4.  Langenfeld, supra note 15, at 146.
  5.  Haupt, “Free Exercise”, supranote 15, at 855.
    [Google Scholar]
  6.  Graglia, supra note 54, at 49.
  7.  See, e.g., Bowenv. Roy, 476 U.S, 693 (1986), a us Supreme Court case where the use of social security numbers in federal assistance programs was challenged on the grounds that the petitioner’s Native American religious beliefs forbid giving out the number because it harmed their child’s spirit. The Court upheld the law, under a rational-basis test.
    [Google Scholar]
  8.  Graglia, supra note 54, at 52.
  9.  Graglia, supra note 54, at 53.
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00403001
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error