2004
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2212-4810
  • E-ISSN: 2212-6465

Abstract

Religion and state, more specifically religion and law, and religion and education are sub-fields that have received considerable scholarly attention. The interstices between these fields have been much less scrutinized, although it is within these spaces where the particular normativities produced and managed by state, law, and religion can be critically assessed, and where the nature of their interaction can be evaluated. We examine the intersecting normativities of religion with the secular public sphere, with education, and with the law, and their discursive fields with respect to the () of the Québec Ministry of Education. The distinct interests associated with these discursive fields meet at bases of common concern: religious pluralism, accommodation, and social cohesion. A common discourse emerges here that is informed by what critics identify as the World Religions Paradigm (). Rather than examine the simply with respect to its dependence on the , we show how the discourses of the general public, education, and law in Québec and Canada meet to reinforce the to produce a singular normativity that determines the shape of public discourses and representations of religion. In its effort to manage religious freedom and promote multiculturalism, the state (legislatively, legally, and educationally) generates the concrete terms by which citizens are to enact both. The logic of the overlapping normativities in the management of religious freedom and promotion of religious pluralism by the state creates the concrete terms by which religious identity and citizenship are defined.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00502003
2017-03-13
2025-12-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/22126465/5/2/22124810_005_02_s003_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00502003&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1.  Maud Blair and David Gillborn, “Face up to racism; Platform; Opinion,”Times Educational Supplement,1999. Retrieved 1 March 2015, https://www.tes.com/news/tes-archive/tes-publication/face-racismplatformopinion. For scholarly treatment of contestations of recent programs of religious education in Britain, we find the following works especially useful: T. Modood and Stephen May, “Multiculturalism and Education in Britain: An Internally Contested Debate,” 35.3 International Journal of Educational Research (2001), 305–317; Mark Chater and Clive Erricker, Does Religious Education Have a Future?: Pedagogical and Policy Prospects (2013).
    [Google Scholar]
  2.  Fraser Giles, “Religious studies teaching is pathetic – either improve it, or ditch it,”The Guardian, 2014. Retrieved 5 December 2014, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/04/religious-studies-ditched-subject-schools.
    [Google Scholar]
  3.  Quoted in Suzanne Owen, “The World Religions Paradigm: Time for a Change,”10.3 Arts & Humanities in Higher Education (2011), 254.
    [Google Scholar]
  4.  Quoted in Owen, supra note 10.
  5.  See both McDonough, supra note 17, and Stephen Macedo, “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls?” 105.3 Ethics (1995), 485.
  6.  McDonough, ibid., 225.
  7.  Leroux, supra note 23.
  8.  Elizabeth Pritchard, “Seriously, What Does ‘Taking Religion Seriously’ Mean?”78.4 Journal of the American Academy of Religion (2010), 1089.
    [Google Scholar]
  9.  Talal Asad, “Muslims as a ‘Religious Minority’ in Europe,” in supranote 3.
    [Google Scholar]
  10.  Rand, supra note 36.
  11.  Baril, supra note 37, emphasis added.
  12.  Macedo, supra note 20, 468, 496.
  13.  Baril, supra note 37.
  14.  Berger, supra note 21, 10.
/content/journals/10.1163/22124810-00502003
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): autonomy; citizenship; education; multiculturalism; normativity; Québec; secular; world religions
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error