oa The AVAC-SMS Metric for the Self-assessment of Maturity of Aviation Safety Management Systems

References

1. Abrini, M. (2016). STPA-based SMS Assessment Tool (Unpublished Bachelor Thesis). The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Faculty of Technology Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aviation Academy (2014). “Project Plan RAAK PRO: Measuring safety in aviation – developing metrics for Safety Management Systems”.The Netherlands: Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Aviation Academy.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dekker, S. (2011). Drift into Failure: From Hunting Broken Components to Understanding Complex Systems. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
4. EASA (2010). Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation and repealing Directive 94/56/EC. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency.
   [Google Scholar]
5. EASA (2014). A Harmonised European Approach to a Performance-Based Environment. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency.
   [Google Scholar]
6. EASA (2017). Management System Assessment Tool. Cologne: European Aviation Safety Agency.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Eurocontrol (2012). Effectiveness of Safety Management. Brussels: Eurocontrol.
   [Google Scholar]
8. FAA (2006). Introduction to Safety Management Systems for Air Operators. Advisory Circular 120-92. USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
   [Google Scholar]
9. FAA (2015). Safety Management Systems for Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental Operations. USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
   [Google Scholar]
10. ICAO (2001). Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation, Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. (9th ed.). Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
11. ICAO (2013). Doc 9859, Safety Management Manual (SMM) (3rd ed.). Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
12. ICAO (2016). Safety Management, Annex 19 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (2nd ed.). Montréal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Karanikas, N. (2016). Critical Review of Safety Performance Metrics, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 17(3), 266–285.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A.L.C., Piric, S., de Boer, R. J. (2016a). Review of Existing Aviation Safety Metrics, RAAK PRO Project: Measuring Safety in Aviation, Project S10931. The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A.L.C., Piric, S., van Aalst, R., de Boer, R. J. (2016b). Results from Surveys about Existing Aviation Safety Metrics, RAAK PRO Project: Measuring Safety in Aviation, Project S10931. The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kaspers, S., Karanikas, N., Roelen, A., Piric, S., van Aalst, R., de Boer, R. J. (2016c). Exploring the Diversity in Safety Measurement Practices: Empirical Results from Aviation. Proceedings of the 1st International Cross-industry Safety Conference, Amsterdam, 3–4 November 2016, Journal of Safety Studies, 2(2), 18–29.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Leveson, N. (2011). Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. Boston, Mass: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Leveson, N. (2015). A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 136, 17–34.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Masoud, S. (2017). SMS Tool: Quantitative Evaluation of Safety Management Systems (Unpublished Bachelor Thesis). The Netherlands: Aviation Academy, Faculty of Technology Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
20. SMICG (2012). Safety Management System Evaluation Tool. Safety Management International Collaboration Group.
    [Google Scholar]