2004
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2589-6725
  • E-ISSN: 2589-6733

Abstract

Abstract

Safety investigations fall under the typical definition of a project since they have definite start and end dates and offer a specific end-product, meaning the safety recommendations which must be considered by the respective stakeholders as a means to improve the safety of daily operations. The scope of this study was to investigate whether safety investigations could benefit from project management. The research consisted of the following steps: (1) a gap analysis between the PMBPOK standard of the Project Management Institute (PMI) and the ICAO/USAF manuals regarding the main activity/knowledge areas and techniques/tools mentioned in these representative investigation standards, (2) based on the findings of the previous step, administration of a questionnaire to examine the degree to which project management areas and activities are present in regional safety investigation standards, and the perception of the participants about their usefulness. The findings suggested that the project management areas and activities are present in regional investigation standards at levels varying from 10% to 97%. Also, risk, quality, communication and stakeholder management are underrepresented in investigation standards. Most of the areas and activities of project management were perceived as very useful by the participants, who expressed some concerns about the danger to increase bureaucracy and complexity of safety investigations. Similar research can be conducted by other industry sectors and regions to detect whether project management principles can be introduced in safety investigations with the aim to increase their effectiveness and performance. Future research can focus on the project management tools and techniques that can be used in safety investigations as well as the examination of the latter through the lenses of agile project management.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.002.PLIO
2018-05-01
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/25896725/1/1/02_ADV2018.1.PLIO.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.002.PLIO&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. ICAO
    ICAO. (2010). Annex 13, Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation (10th ed.). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ICAO
    ICAO. (2015). Doc 9756, Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation, Part I — Organization and Planning. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ICAO
    ICAO. (2012). Doc 9756, Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation Part II — Procedures and Checklists. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ICAO
    ICAO. (2011). Doc 9756, Manual of Aircraft Accident and Incident Investigation Part III, Investigation. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ICAO
    ICAO. (2003). Doc 9756, Manual of Aircraft AcciAdent and Incident Investigation, part IV Reporting (1st ed.). Montreal, Quembec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ICAO
    ICAO. (n.d.). Doc 9962 AN/482, Manual on Accident and Incident Investigation Policies and Procedures (1st ed.). Montral, Quembec, Canada: ICAO.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Project Management Institute, PMI
    Project Management Institute, PMI. (2013). PMBOK (5th ed.). Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Milmo, C. (2014, July18). Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: No forensic investigators, coordination or body bags as Ukraine locals are left to scour gruesome scene. Retrieved 31 January, 2018 from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/malaysia-airlines-mh17-crash-no-forensic-investigators-co-ordination-or-body-bags-as-locals-are-left-9615895.html
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Press, A. A. (2014, August04). MH17 investigators frustrated at limited access due to fighting. Retrieved 31 January 2018 from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/05/mh17-
investigators-frustrated-at-limited-access-due-to-fighting
    [Google Scholar]
  10. USAF
    USAF. (2014). AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports. USA: USAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. USAF
    USAF. (2014). AIR FORCE MANUAL 91-223, AVIATION SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS AND REPORTS. USA: USAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. USAF
    USAF. (2017). AIR FORCE POLICY DIRECTIVE 91-2, Safety, Safety Programs. USA: USAF.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. IBM
    IBM (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.002.PLIO
Loading
/content/journals/10.5117/ADV2018.1.002.PLIO
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Project Management; Safety Investigations
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error