
Full text loading...
Emotivism is the ethical view that moral judgements are mere expressions of emotions. On the internet we find a radical variety of this view, exported from the social media, where expressions of emotions are treated as truths about matters. One expresses an emotion that one has had; since one had it, this is a fact and cannot be doubted; hence what provoked it must have occurred, too. A claim to truth is hidden in this radical emotivism, which also entails that the appeals following from these emotions, too, are justified. Now, cancelling people on the basis of hear-say is problematic as such, particularly in the absence of legal support for the events that allegedly caused the emotions. Where art is concerned, however, what is really sacrificed is the autonomy of art as such. In this article I discuss the nature and importance of this autonomy, and show that radical emotivism is problematic in its own terms.