En/En. Tegen ideologische begrenzing van academische vrijheid | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 44, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

In 2021 the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences (Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, KNAW) published the report “Academic Freedom in the Netherlands”. That report explicitly creates room for ideological limitations on academic freedom. I argue that this is at odds with the critical nature of science. Ideological limitations at the academy can foster a culture of (self)censorship. Not just among individual researchers, but also at a more systemic level. The core of my argument is that ideology and science can coexist (and/and), but that ideological limitation ought not to exist (and/or).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.1.004.SOEH
2023-05-01
2024-07-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bailey, A.“Navigating Privilege-Preserving Epistemic Pushback in Feminist and Critical Race Philosophy Classes”, Hypatia2017, 32.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bell, D.Race, Racism and American Law (6th ed). New York: Aspen Publishers, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, J.Bodies That Matter. Abingdon: Routledge, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. ChildsP. & P.Williams, An Introduction To Post-Colonial Theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Commissie Verkenning Herziening Gedragscode Wetenschapsbeoefening, Adviesrapport. Oktober2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooper, C.Fat Activism: A Radical Social Movement, London: Intellect Books, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Crenshaw, K.W.“Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”, Stanford Law Review1991, 43.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Derrida, J.Marges de la philosophie. Parijs: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Donskis, L., I.Sabelis, F.Kamsteeg & H.Wels, Academia in Crisis. The Rise and Risk of Neoliberal Education in Europe. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fanon, F.The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felski, R.The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M.Les mots et les choses – une archéologie des sciences humaines. Parijs: Gallimard, 1966.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Foucault, M.L’archéologie du savoir. Parijs: Gallimard, 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fukuyama, F.Identity. Contemporary Identity Politics and the Struggle for Recognition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fukuyama, F.Liberalism and its discontents. London: Profile Books, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Halperin, D.One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. And Other Essays on Greek Love. Abingdon: Routledge, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris, C.I.“Whiteness as Property”, Harvard Law Review1993, 106.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jay, M.The Dialectical Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jerak-Zuiderent, S., J.Brenninkmeijer, A.M’charek en J.Pols, Goede wetenschap: Een visie van binnenuit. ZonMw Projectnummer 445003003. Amsterdam UMC – locatie AMC | Afdeling Ethiek, Recht & Humaniora, Universiteit van Amsterdam | Afdeling Antropologie. September2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kant, I. (1784), Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?. Kants Werke VIII. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986 (1784).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. KNAW, Academische vrijheid in Nederland – een begripsanalyse en richtsnoer. Amsterdam, KNAW, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Möschel, M.Law, Lawyers and Race. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Sullivan, N.A Critical Introduction to Queer Theory. New York: New York University Press, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Van den Brom, L.J.God alomtegenwoordig. Kok: Kampen, 1982.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Berkel, K.“Descartes in debat met Voetius: de mislukte introductie van het cartesianisme aan de Utrechtse universiteit (1639-1645)”, Tijdschrift geschiedenis geneeskunde, natuurwet.,wisk.,techniek7 (1984) 1 (Themanummer XVIII C 124).
    [Google Scholar]
  26. VSNU, De Nederlandse Gedragscode Wetenschapsbeoefening. Den Haag: VSNU, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. VSNU, Nederlandse Gedragscode Wetenschappelijke Integriteit. Den Haag: VSNU, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Williams, P.J.“Alchemical Notes: Reconstructing Ideals from Deconstructed Rights”, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review1987, 22.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams, K.W.“Race, Reform and Retrenchment: Transformation and Legitimation in Antidiscrimination Law”, Harvard Law Review1988, 101.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.1.004.SOEH
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error