Burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid, ter inleiding | Amsterdam University Press Journals Online
2004
Volume 44, Issue 3/4
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

The Introduction to this special issue on civil disobedience presents an overview of the Dutch philosophical debate from the 1970s to the present. A disobedient citizen typically acts against the law while recognizing the legitimacy of the democratic legal order as a whole, in order to challenge a specific legal injustice. Rawls’ liberal model is the default view. Radical critics relax Rawls’ strict requirements for disobedient actions and shift the focus of the fight for justice from individual liberty to social equality. In political practice, the response of the Dutch authorities is not very tolerant. The Introduction concludes with an overview of the essays, many of which focus on the climate crisis.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.002.KEUL
2023-12-01
2024-07-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/01672444/44/3/4/FEP2023.3-4.002.KEUL.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.002.KEUL&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bedau, Hugo Adam (ed.), Civil Disobedience in Focus. London: Routledge, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burg, Wibren van den, “Burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid: teken van nihilism en normvervaging?”, Recht en kritiek12 (1986) 3, 213-228.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Burg, Wibren van den, Een andere visie op burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid. Deventer: Kluwer, Postscriptum reeks 1986.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Celikates, Robin, “Democratizing Civil Disobedience”, Philosophy and Social Criticism42 (2016a) 10, 983-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Celikates, Robin, “Rethinking Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Contestation—Beyond the Liberal Paradigm”, Constellations23 (2016b) 1, 37-45.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Celikates, Robin, “Radical Democratic Disobedience”, in: W.Scheuerman (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 128–152.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fuller, Lon, The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Green, Leslie, Globalization, Disobedience, and the Rule of Law. Working paper, https://www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Green-Globalization-Civil-Disobedience-and-the-Rule-of-Law-2006.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartogh, G.A. den, “Bespreking van W. van den Burg, Een andere visie op burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid (1986)”, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Rechtsfilosofie en Rechtstheorie, 1988, nr. 2, 17, 132-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Locke, John, Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Locke, John, “A Letter Concerning Toleration”, in: JohnHorton and SusanMendus (eds.) John Locke – A Letter Concerning Toleration In Focus. London: Routledge, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mout, M.E.H.N.Plakkaat van verlatinge. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rawls, John, “Definition and justification of civil disobedience”, in: Bedau (1991), 103-121.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rawls, John, Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Scheuerman, William E.“Recent Theories of Civil Disobedience: An Anti-Legal Turn?”, The Journal of Political Philosophy23 (2015) 4, 427–449.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ScheuermanW. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Civil Disobedience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Schuyt, C.J.M.Recht, orde en burgerlijke Ongehoorzaamheid. Rotterdam: Universitaire pers, 1972.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Vink, Ton, 294 Sr: zedenverval en zedenverwildering in Nederland. Budel: Damon, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.002.KEUL
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error