2004
Volume 44, Issue 3/4
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

In the light of climate change, the problem of civil disobedience arises in a new way. In discussion with the heuristics of fear of Hans Jonas and a seminal article of Hannah Arendt on civil disobedience the positions of Socrates and Thoreau are examined. Central themes are: the tension between a moral and a political attitude, public versus private action, the question of violence and peacefulness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.007.ACHT
2023-12-01
2024-11-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/01672444/44/3/4/FEP2023.3-4.007.ACHT.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.007.ACHT&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Achterhuis, Hans, e.a. De Denkers, een intellectuele biografie van de twintigste eeuw. Amsterdam: Contact, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arendt, Hannah, Het waagstuk van de politiek. Over politieke leugens en burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid. Utrecht: Klement, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt, Hannah, Het leven van de geest. Amsterdam: Ten Have, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. De Schutter, Dirk en Peeters, Remi, “Inleiding van de vertalers, in”: Arendt2018, p.7-21.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Jonas, Hans, Das Prinzip Verantwortung: Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1979.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thoreau, Henry David, Walden en de plicht tot burgerlijke ongehoorzaamheid (vertaling Anton Haaksma). Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Visser ’t Hooft, H.Ph., “Hans Jonas”, in: Achterhuis e.a. 1999, p. 344-353.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2023.3/4.007.ACHT
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error