2004
Volume 45, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0167-2444
  • E-ISSN: 2949-8651

Abstract

Abstract

The recent war in Gaza shows once again that conducting military operations in densely populated areas is, to say the least, problematic both from a legal and a moral perspective. International Humanitarian Law (IHL) and the Just War Theory do not entirely prohibit military actions that will knowingly provoke unintended harm to noncombatants. For this type of actions to be permissible two conditions must be satisfied. First, the military advantage should outweigh the harm done to the civilian population. Second, all feasible precautions must be taken to minimize the risk of collateral harm. This article primarily addresses the second condition. In the first part, the focus will be on what IHL has to say about the duty to take precautionary measures. Given the fact that IHL is not very precise in stipulating what ‘’ precautions are, we will turn in the second part to the military ethics literature for more guidance. In the last part of the article, we want to ascertain to what extent the introduction of AI-enabled decision support systems can be considered a relevant ethical factor in the debate on the scope of precautionary measures.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.4.002.CEUL
2024-12-01
2025-02-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aanvullend Protocol I bij de Conventies van Genève van 12 augustus 1949, Artikel 57, 8juni1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkin, R. C., “Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture”. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 2008, 121–128.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Best, Geoffrey, War & Law Since 1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bode, Ingvild & Watts, Tom, “Loitering munitions and unpredictability: autonomy in weapon systems and challenges to human control”, Center for War Studies and Royal Holloway Centre for International Security. https://www.autonorms.eu/loitering-munitions-and-unpredictability-autonomy-in-weapon-systems-and-challenges-to-human-control/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen, M. Sheldon, Arms and Judgment: Law, Morality, and the Conduct of War in the Twentieth Century. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crawford, Neta, Accountability for Killing: Moral Responsibility for Collateral Damage in America’s Post-9/11 Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dill, Janina, “Do Attackers Have a Legal Duty of Care? Limits to the ‘Individualization of War’”, International Theory11 (2019) 1, 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Eastridge, B. J., Mabry, R. L., Seguin, P., Cantrell, J., Tops, T., Uribe, P., Mallett, O., Zubko, T., Oetjen-Gerdes, L., Rasmussen, T. E., Butler, F. K., Kotwal, R. S., Holcomb, J. B., Wade, C., Champion, H., Lawnick, M., Moores, L., & Blackbourne, L. H.“Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): Implications for the future of combat casualty care”, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery73 (2012) 6, S431–S437.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Haque, Adil Ahmad, Law and Morality at War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kasher, Asa & Yadlin, Amos, “Military Ethics of Fighting Terrorism: An Israeli Perspective”, Journal of Military Ethics4 (2005) 1, 3-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kasher, Asa & Yadlin, Amos, met repliek van Margalit, Avishai en Walzer, Michael, “Israel & the Rules of War: an Exchange” 11 juni 2009 ‘Israel & the Rules of War’: An Exchange | Avishai Margalit | The New York Review of Books (nybooks.com).
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Khatib, R., McKee, M., & Yusuf, S.“Counting the dead in Gaza: Difficult but essential”, The Lancet, (2024), S0140673624011693.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kotwal, R. S., Mazuchowski, E. L., Janak, J. C., Howard, J. T., Harcke, H. T., Holcomb, J. B., Eastridge, B. J., Gurney, J. M., & Shackelford, S. A.“United States military fatalities during Operation New Dawn”, Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery91 (2021) 2, 375–383.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lazar, Seth, Sparing Civilians. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lee, Steven, “Double Effect, Double Intention, and Asymmetric Warfare,”Journal of Military Ethics, 3 (2004) 3, 233-251.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Luban, David, “Risk Taking and Force Protection”, in: YitzhakBenbaji & NaomiSussmann (eds.), Reading Walzer. New York/London: Routledge, 2014, 277-301.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. McKernan, B., & Davies, H.. “The machine did it coldly’: Israel used AI to identify 37,000 Hamas targets.” (2024, April3) https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/apr/03/israel-gaza-ai-database-hamas-airstrikes.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McMahan, Jeff, “The Just Distribution of Harm Between Combatants and Non-combatants,”Philosophy & Public Affairs38 (2010) 4, 342-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Pasquier, P., De Rudnicki, S., Donat, N., Auroy, Y., & Merat, S.“Type et épidémiologie des blessures de guerre, à propos de deux conflits actuels: Irak et Afghanistan”, Annales Françaises d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation30 (2011) 11, 819–827.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Riesen, E., “The Moral Case for the Development and Use of Autonomous Weapon Systems.”Journal of Military Ethics21 (2022) 2, 132–150.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Shue, Henry, “Civilian Protection and Force Protection”, in: DavidWhetham (ed.), Ethics, Law and Military Operations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, 135-47.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Thurnher, J. S.“No one at the controls: Legal implications of fully autonomous targeting.”Joint Force Quarterly, (2012) 67.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Umbrello, S., Torres, P., & De Bellis, A. F.“The future of war: Could lethal autonomous weapons make conflict more ethical?”AI & SOCIETY35 (2020) 1, 273–282.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. US Department of Defense, “Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response Action Plan”, (CHMR-AP), 25augustus2022.
  25. Van Goozen, Sara, Distributing the Harm of Just Wars: In Defence of an Egalitarian Baseline. London/New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic Books, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Walzer, Michael, “Responsibility and Proportionality in State and Nonstate Wars”, The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters39 (2009) 1, 40-52.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wertheimer, Roger, “Jus Ante Bellum Principles of Pre-War Conduct”, in: GeorgeLucas (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Military Ethics (1 ed.). London/New York: Routledge, 2015, 54-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Y oung, G., “Should Autonomous Weapons Need a Reason to Kill?”, Journal of Applied Philosophy39 (2022) 5, 886–900.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zohar, Noam, “Risking and Protecting Lives: Soldiers and Opposing Civilians,” in: H.Frowe & G.Lang (eds.), How We Fight. Oxford: OUP, 2014, 155-171.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.5117/FEP2024.4.002.CEUL
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error