2004
Volume 26, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1385-1535
  • E-ISSN: 1875-7324

Abstract

Abstract

Attention for the use of creative research methods in various scientific disciplines is increasing. In this article, several reasons are given as to why researchers are drawn to these methods. The challenges that researchers may face in using these methods are also described. The article ends with a brief outlook on the possible future of creative methods, pointing to how they can contribute to acquiring acknowledge and tap into different types of knowledge.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/KWALON2021.2.008.VAAR
2021-01-01
2021-10-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrä, C., Bliesemann de Guevara, B., Cole, L., & House, D.(2020). Knowing through needlework: Curating the difficult knowledge of conflict textiles. Critical Military Studies, 6(3-4), 341-359.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Askins, K., & Pain, R.(2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803-821.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bengry-Howell, A., Wiles, R., Nind, M., & Crow, G.(2011). A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: Netnography, child-led research and creative research methods. National Centre for Research Methods: NCRM.
  4. Blodgett, A.T., Coholic, D.A., Schinke, R.J., McGannon, K.R., Peltier, D., & Pheasant, C.(2013). Moving beyond words: Exploring the use of an arts-based method in Aboriginal community sport research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5(3), 312-331.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown, N.(2021). Scope and continuum of participatory research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1902980
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Caldwell, G., Osborne, L., Mewburn, I., & Crowther, P.(2015). Guerrillas in the (urban) midst: Developing and using creative research methods – guerrilla research tactics. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(3), 21-36.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Capous Desyllas, M.(2014). Using photovoice with sex workers: The power of art, agency and resistance. Qualitative Social Work, 13(4), 477-501.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Coemans, S., & Hannes, K.(2017). Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations. Educational Research Review, 22, 34-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohenmiller, A.S.(2018). Visual arts as a tool for phenomenology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(1), Art. 15.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dunn, V., & Mellor, T.(2017). Creative, participatory projects with young people: Reflections over five years. Research for All, 1(2), 284-299.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Eisner, E.(2008). Art and knowledge. In J.G.Knowles & A.L.Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 3-12). London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellsworth, E.(2005). Place of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
  13. Fortmann, L.(2014). Giving back, moving forward. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Foster, V.(2012). The pleasure principle: Employing arts-based methods in social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 532-545.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gauntlett, D.(2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences.London: Routledge.
  16. Groot, B.C., Abma, T.A., & Weerman, A.(2019). Het onzegbare uiten: Een creatieve vorm van participatief actieonderzoek. Participatie en Herstel, 28(2), 17-26.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Groot, B.C., Weerman, A., Overbeek, F., & Abma, T.A.(2020). Making a difference: Participatory health research with unemployed citizens and policymakers. International Review of Qualitative Research, 13(2), 200-218.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gundarina, O.(2020). Interviews with creative techniques: Research with Russian-speaking migrant pupils. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1804543
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N.(2017). Ethnography after humanism.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Harman, S.(2018). Making the invisible visible in international relations: Film, co-produced research and transnational feminism. European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 791-813.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawkins, H.(2011). Dialogues and doings: Sketching the relationships between geography and art. Geography Compass, 5(7), 464-478.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kara, H.(2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol: Policy Press.
  23. Kelemen, M., & Hamilton, L.(2015). The role of creative methods in re-defining the impact agenda. Keele: Community Animation and Social Innovation Centre.
  24. Kennelly, J.(2015). ‘You’re making our city look bad’: Olympic security, neoliberal urbanization, and homeless youth. Ethnography, 16(1), 3-24.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Knowles, J.G., & Cole, A.L.(2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: Sage Publications.
  26. Lawrence, R.L.(2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. In J.M.Dirkx (Ed.), Adult learning and the emotional self: New directions for adult and continuing education, Number 120 (pp. 65-77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Macpherson, H., Hart, A., & Heaver, B.(2014). Impacts between academic researchers and community partners: Some critical reflections on impact agendas in a ‘visual arts for resilience’ research project. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(1), 27-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Martikainen, J.(2019). Visual arts-based research methods in social science research. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 323-345.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitchell, G. J., Dupuis, S., Jonas-Simpson, C., Whyte, C., Carson, J., & Gillis, J.(2011). The experience of engaging with research-based drama: Evaluation and explication of synergy and transformation. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(4), 379-392.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pain, R., Askins, K., Banks, S., Cook, T., Crawford, G., Crookes, L., et al. (2015). Mapping alternative impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research.Durham: Durham University.
  31. Purscell, R.(2007). Images for change: Community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal, 44(1), 111-122.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rapport, F., Wainwright, P., & Elwyn, G.(2005). ‘Of the edgelands’: Broadening the scope of qualitative methodology. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities, 31(1), 37-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Salmon, A.(2007). Walking the talk: How participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 982-993.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Skinner, E., & Masuda, J.R.(2013). Right to a healthy city? Examining the relationship between urban space and health inequality by Aboriginal youth artist-activists in Winnipeg. Social Science & Medicine, 91, 210-218.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Taylor, P., & Murphy, C.(2014). Catch the fire: An art-full guide to unleashing the creative power of youth, adults and communities.Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
  36. Trell, E.-M., & Hoven, B. van.(2010). Making sense of place: Exploring creative and (inter)active research methods with young people. Fennia, 188(1), 91-104.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Vaart, G. van der, Hoven, B. van, & Huigen, P.P.P.(2018). Creative and arts-based research methods in academic research: Lessons from a participatory research project in the Netherlands. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), Art. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Vigurs, K., & Kara, H.(2017). Participants’ productive disruption of a community photo-elicitation project: Improvised methodologies in practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(5), 513-523.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Walsh, C.A., Rutherford, G., & Crough, M.(2013). Arts-based research: Creating social change for incarcerated women. Creative Approaches to Research, 6(1), 119-139.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., Crow, G., & Nind, M.(2013). But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(1), 18-33.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Woodgate, R.L., Zurba, M., & Tennent, P.(2017). Worth a thousand words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with photovoice as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), Art. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/KWALON2021.2.008.VAAR
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error