De aantrekkingskracht en uitdagingen van creatieve onderzoeksmethoden

References

1. Andrä, C., Bliesemann de Guevara, B., Cole, L., & House, D.(2020). Knowing through needlework: Curating the difficult knowledge of conflict textiles. Critical Military Studies, 6(3-4), 341-359.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Askins, K., & Pain, R.(2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 803-821.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bengry-Howell, A., Wiles, R., Nind, M., & Crow, G.(2011). A review of the academic impact of three methodological innovations: Netnography, child-led research and creative research methods. National Centre for Research Methods: NCRM.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blodgett, A.T., Coholic, D.A., Schinke, R.J., McGannon, K.R., Peltier, D., & Pheasant, C.(2013). Moving beyond words: Exploring the use of an arts-based method in Aboriginal community sport research. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 5(3), 312-331.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, N.(2021). Scope and continuum of participatory research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2021.1902980
   [Google Scholar]
6. Caldwell, G., Osborne, L., Mewburn, I., & Crowther, P.(2015). Guerrillas in the (urban) midst: Developing and using creative research methods – guerrilla research tactics. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(3), 21-36.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Capous Desyllas, M.(2014). Using photovoice with sex workers: The power of art, agency and resistance. Qualitative Social Work, 13(4), 477-501.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coemans, S., & Hannes, K.(2017). Researchers under the spell of the arts: Two decades of using arts-based methods in community-based inquiry with vulnerable populations. Educational Research Review, 22, 34-49.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cohenmiller, A.S.(2018). Visual arts as a tool for phenomenology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(1), Art. 15.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dunn, V., & Mellor, T.(2017). Creative, participatory projects with young people: Reflections over five years. Research for All, 1(2), 284-299.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eisner, E.(2008). Art and knowledge. In J.G.Knowles & A.L.Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 3-12). London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ellsworth, E.(2005). Place of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy.New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fortmann, L.(2014). Giving back, moving forward. Journal of Research Practice, 10(2), 1-5.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Foster, V.(2012). The pleasure principle: Employing arts-based methods in social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 15(4), 532-545.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gauntlett, D.(2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Groot, B.C., Abma, T.A., & Weerman, A.(2019). Het onzegbare uiten: Een creatieve vorm van participatief actieonderzoek. Participatie en Herstel, 28(2), 17-26.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Groot, B.C., Weerman, A., Overbeek, F., & Abma, T.A.(2020). Making a difference: Participatory health research with unemployed citizens and policymakers. International Review of Qualitative Research, 13(2), 200-218.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gundarina, O.(2020). Interviews with creative techniques: Research with Russian-speaking migrant pupils. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1804543
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N.(2017). Ethnography after humanism.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Harman, S.(2018). Making the invisible visible in international relations: Film, co-produced research and transnational feminism. European Journal of International Relations, 24(4), 791-813.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hawkins, H.(2011). Dialogues and doings: Sketching the relationships between geography and art. Geography Compass, 5(7), 464-478.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kara, H.(2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol: Policy Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kelemen, M., & Hamilton, L.(2015). The role of creative methods in re-defining the impact agenda. Keele: Community Animation and Social Innovation Centre.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kennelly, J.(2015). ‘You’re making our city look bad’: Olympic security, neoliberal urbanization, and homeless youth. Ethnography, 16(1), 3-24.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Knowles, J.G., & Cole, A.L.(2008). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lawrence, R.L.(2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. In J.M.Dirkx (Ed.), Adult learning and the emotional self: New directions for adult and continuing education, Number 120 (pp. 65-77). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Macpherson, H., Hart, A., & Heaver, B.(2014). Impacts between academic researchers and community partners: Some critical reflections on impact agendas in a ‘visual arts for resilience’ research project. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 13(1), 27-32.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Martikainen, J.(2019). Visual arts-based research methods in social science research. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(2), 323-345.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mitchell, G. J., Dupuis, S., Jonas-Simpson, C., Whyte, C., Carson, J., & Gillis, J.(2011). The experience of engaging with research-based drama: Evaluation and explication of synergy and transformation. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(4), 379-392.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pain, R., Askins, K., Banks, S., Cook, T., Crawford, G., Crookes, L., et al. (2015). Mapping alternative impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research.Durham: Durham University.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Purscell, R.(2007). Images for change: Community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal, 44(1), 111-122.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Rapport, F., Wainwright, P., & Elwyn, G.(2005). ‘Of the edgelands’: Broadening the scope of qualitative methodology. Journal of Medical Ethics: Medical Humanities, 31(1), 37-42.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Salmon, A.(2007). Walking the talk: How participatory interview methods can democratize research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(7), 982-993.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Skinner, E., & Masuda, J.R.(2013). Right to a healthy city? Examining the relationship between urban space and health inequality by Aboriginal youth artist-activists in Winnipeg. Social Science & Medicine, 91, 210-218.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Taylor, P., & Murphy, C.(2014). Catch the fire: An art-full guide to unleashing the creative power of youth, adults and communities.Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Trell, E.-M., & Hoven, B. van.(2010). Making sense of place: Exploring creative and (inter)active research methods with young people. Fennia, 188(1), 91-104.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vaart, G. van der, Hoven, B. van, & Huigen, P.P.P.(2018). Creative and arts-based research methods in academic research: Lessons from a participatory research project in the Netherlands. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(2), Art. 19.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Vigurs, K., & Kara, H.(2017). Participants’ productive disruption of a community photo-elicitation project: Improvised methodologies in practice. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(5), 513-523.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Walsh, C.A., Rutherford, G., & Crough, M.(2013). Arts-based research: Creating social change for incarcerated women. Creative Approaches to Research, 6(1), 119-139.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wiles, R., Bengry-Howell, A., Crow, G., & Nind, M.(2013). But is it innovation? The development of novel methodological approaches in qualitative research. Methodological Innovations Online, 8(1), 18-33.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Woodgate, R.L., Zurba, M., & Tennent, P.(2017). Worth a thousand words? Advantages, challenges and opportunities in working with photovoice as a qualitative research method with youth and their families. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(1), Art. 2.
    [Google Scholar]