2004
Volume 62, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2542-6583
  • E-ISSN: 2590-3268

Abstract

This article offers a critique of Philipse’s main argument in favor of disjunctive atheism – that is, the view that either semantic or classic atheism is true – as presented in his well-known . After a number of preliminary comments, the authors argue against two crucial premises of the argument. First, they show that it does not follow from every religious proposition’s being outside of the domain of reason, that semantic atheism is true. Second, they explain why it does not follow from every proposition’s being within the domain of reason, that classic atheism is true.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2008.62.024.PEEL
2008-02-01
2022-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.5117/NTT2008.62.024.PEEL
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error